Bear Down Wildcats

Also defamed Miller and said he stopped recruiting and had given up in September.

Alieberman wrote:I think he did talk to "Look" but was then told how illegal that was so he rushed back on the radio to lie about it.

Just my theory

Either way Hansen sucks and should be fired

Yep. Either he didn’t talk to Book and just made that shit up on the first call, or he did talk to Book and used his follow up appearance to lie about it.

Either way, he should be done. Continuing to feature his columns just says that the Arizona Daily Star has no problem printing lies.

He never talked to ex-coach "Look"

Her called for Miller to be fired right after the first BSPN story came out.

He has been badmouthing UA basketball for years.

Hansen just needs to GTFO!!! Beside, even though it has only been one day, I think that Caitlin -- is that her name? -- has done a much better job of covering things than Hansen.

Chicat wrote:

Alieberman wrote:I think he did talk to "Look" but was then told how illegal that was so he rushed back on the radio to lie about it.

Just my theory

Either way Hansen sucks and should be fired

Yep. Either he didn’t talk to Book and just made that shit up on the first call, or he did talk to Book and used his follow up appearance to lie about it.

Either way, he should be done. Continuing to feature his columns just says that the Arizona Daily Star has no problem printing lies.

Looking forward to "Caitlin's Sunday Notebook".

At the very least, Miller should replicate Lute and bar Hansen at the door (I'm sure the team would rather have Caitlin in there anyway).

MrMeow wrote:

Chicat wrote:

Alieberman wrote:I think he did talk to "Look" but was then told how illegal that was so he rushed back on the radio to lie about it.

Just my theory

Either way Hansen sucks and should be fired

Yep. Either he didn’t talk to Book and just made that shit up on the first call, or he did talk to Book and used his follow up appearance to lie about it.

Either way, he should be done. Continuing to feature his columns just says that the Arizona Daily Star has no problem printing lies.

Looking forward to "Caitlin's Sunday Notebook".

At the very least, Miller should replicate Lute and bar Hansen at the door (I'm sure the team would rather have Caitlin in there anyway).

Don't forget "Ask Ms. Football"!

It's the totality of multiple things. One big thing not yet mentioned, to me at least, was the timing of the "Look/Bowen" thing. ESPNs story was starting to really fall off the deep end when he goes on the air and says that shit. Like, "I need to come up with something to keep this from getting away." So if indeed it is true and he recanted because it was something he was not allowed to know, you still have what appears to be a "well I know this, so lets throw that at him to keep this going," which is also complete horse shit.

Hansen does a mea culpa.

http://tucson.com/sports/greghansen/gre ... -top-story" target="_blank

Too little, too late Pops. Retire now.

That's some weak ass shit. "I'm sorry" goes a long way. So does "I lied".

People should picket outside the Arizona Daily Star.

Wow he really doesn’t get it.

Anyone could look past a sat column when we where all thinking the same.

But being so close to the program that you could give perspective in the face of a national onslaught but don’t and then going on a Phoenix radio station to pour gasoline on the flames beginning to dull with lies?

That shits unforgivable.

A real man knows how to apologize. Of course, real men have integrity. Hansen has contrarianism.

To be clear, that was not an apology. He said he regretted not using the mealy-mouthed words, "if this is true". He never said he regretted any of the other things he said in that article. And he has the fucking nerve to say that Miller claimed "ignorance and that he hasn't been vindicated". So he is basically doing the same shit that BSPN is doing, standing by his original "story". But Miller never claimed "ignorance", he claimed innocence. And, to any reasonable person, the fact that BSPN has continued changing their story / timeline should be enough to say that the story is bogus on its face, which is really all the "vindication" that should be needed.

Hansen should NEVER be allowed near any UofA team, player, or coach, ever again. He needs to be demoted to mailroom clerk. Give us Caitlin!!!

These last few lines....

It doesn’t mean you can go on a Phoenix radio station, as I did on Tuesday, and exaggerate a scenario that had Book Richardson feeding me information. He did not. I apologized to Richardson through his attorney and both men were kind enough to say we should move on.

I hope you will trust me to do the same.

....... are the equivalent of someone trailing off with a half-hearted, rambling mumble before actually getting to the point of admitting they were ones who stole your lunch out of the office fridge.

Wait he apologized to Book, what about Miller?

If I tried to “apologize” like that to my wife, I’d have even more time to post on here cause she’d be gone.

BBQ wildcat wrote:To be clear, that was not an apology. He said he regretted not using the mealy-mouthed words, "if this is true". He never said he regretted any of the other things he said in that article. And he has the fucking nerve to say that Miller claimed "ignorance and that he hasn't been vindicated". So he is basically doing the same shit that BSPN is doing, standing by his original "story". But Miller never claimed "ignorance", he claimed innocence. And, to any reasonable person, the fact that BSPN has continued changing their story / timeline should be enough to say that the story is bogus on its face, which is really all the "vindication" that should be needed.

Hansen should NEVER be allowed near any UofA team, player, or coach, ever again. He needs to be demoted to mailroom clerk. Give us Caitlin!!!

Free Caitlin

Olsondogg wrote:If I tried to “apologize” like that to my wife, I’d have even more time to post on here cause she’d be gone.

Well it’s clear what led to Greg’s divorce.

So how do we let him and the ADS know this Is not good enough?

azcat49 wrote:So how do we let him and the ADS know this Is not good enough?

I'm starting with not visiting their website (tucson.com). I won't click on any Hansen articles ever again. Don't follow any of them on Twitter. Don't buy the paper.

It doesn’t mean you can go on a Phoenix radio station, as I did on Tuesday, and exaggerate a scenario that had Book Richardson feeding me information. He did not. I apologized to Richardson through his attorney and both men were kind enough to say we should move on.

What does that even mean?
"Exaggerate a scenario"
Either you were in conact with Book or you lied about it.
Wtf?

More like Book's attorney called and said "you just accused my client of violating a court order".

Maybe we should all post comments on tucson.com claiming we got it from someone ( a high ranking Pac-12 official) whose name rhymes with "hairy cock" who said he listened to a taped conversation of Greg Hansen placing an order for kiddie pron with Roy Moore ... and conclude with an apology to Roy Moore.

edit ( )

Omfg.

God bless you, that is amazing

Roflmao, great job. I would b love to put that on social media if I knew how

Don't let this thread get buried. Hansen is a douche and should NEVER again be allowed to cover any UofA sports. He should be banned from all press conferences.

#firegreghansen
#freecaitlin

I cant believe I sat there and read GH "apology" or whatever you want to call it. F'n terrible.

Btw love the exchange between Greg and Dookie V . That was Awesome with a capital A baby!

lmmfao

UAEebs86 wrote:

So, does Hansen also consider himself "Mr. Basketball"?

What a fucking tool. Fire his sorry ass, ADS.

Hansen is officially the ASU of local sports writers.

Longhorned wrote:Hansen is officially the ASU of local sports writers.

You're on a roll. It's March and you're getting hot at the right time.

Lol Irish! Another great one...you should send that to Hansen! #FireHansen

Greg at it again this time disrespecting PJC, this man needs to be fired.

CatFanOneMil wrote:

Greg at it again this time disrespecting PJC, this man needs to be fired.

I just saw this, and cannot believe my eyes. He is an absolutely disgusting POS, I want to know why they are keeping him around.

Fuck him.

PJC, you're a huge reason we're here. Keep doing your thing.

Wtf. How is that funny.

I just posted this on twitter but the only way to stop this shit now is to boycott Tucson.com and not support sponsors of theirs until Hansen is properly dealt with or at least offers a decent apology.

Seriously, fuck that guy.

God, I want this conversation to go down:

Robbins: Coach we are behind you 100% for as long as you want to be here. What can we do to make that happen?

Miller: Get that dumbass Hansen out of town

Robbins: Let me make some calls. Consider it done.

I hate him so much. Can’t wait till he’s fired or retired.

What an asshole

There is a link in the on-line Star to provide comments to the editor. I posted some and they gave me a website to review all comments and most were pretty pointed about getting rid of this guy. My recommendation is use that link and start to comment to the sports editor about his job if he does not do something. Ryan should react.

TheCat wrote:There is a link in the on-line Star to provide comments to the editor. I posted some and they gave me a website to review all comments and most were pretty pointed about getting rid of this guy. My recommendation is use that link and start to comment to the sports editor about his job if he does not do something. Ryan should react.

Got the link for us?

It is always good to quote their code of ethics when writing to the Star. The following is from their code and 2-3 portions were clearly violated. Sorry it is so long.
Publishing ethics
Fair or not, too many readers believe that newspapers are sloppy, shallow,
careless and callous. To counter those beliefs, we must be accountable.
Accountable for our mistakes. Accountable for the decisions we make.
Accountable for explaining to readers what our standards are. Accountable for
fair application of these standards. The following guidelines will help us be
honest in how we present the news and consistent and fair in how we treat news
subjects.
Bylines
If a reporter in the field provides information to a staffer who writes the story, the
reporter in the field gets the byline. Any staff member who provides information
may be given a byline, regardless of his or his job or title. If multiple staffers
report the story, the byline is the editor’s judgment call. In general, the byline
should go to the staffer who reported key facts. A double byline or editor’s note
also can be used when more than one staff member makes a substantial
contribution to the reporting or writing of a story. A credit at the end of the story
recognizes reporting contributions that are notable but don’t call for a double
byline. If either of the staffers with a double byline was not in the datelined
location, say who was where in a note at the story’s end. For roundups, the
byline goes to the writer, with credit in a note at the end of the story to the
reporters who contributed substantial information. When compiling stories from
wire services, remove the bylines and credit “from wire services.’’
Clarifications and corrections
Day-to-day mistakes, no matter how small, have become a significant factor in
the declining credibility of newspapers. We could enhance our standing with the
public greatly just by getting the facts straight and spelling words correctly. That,
of course, is what we are supposed to do. Corrections will be anchored on A2
under a headline of Corrections. All requests for a correction must be resolved on
the same business day that the request is made. Corrections should be posted
and information corrected on StarNet immediately, instead of waiting for the next
print publication cycle. A statement of our corrections policy will run every day
on A2. All errors, no matter how small, must be corrected on A2. This includes
misspellings of names in stories and of place names in graphics and sentences
that end in mid-clause because of pagination errors. If necessary, a follow-up
story, such as notes columns in Sports, can correct a previous item. But the initial
correction must also appear on A2. Anyone who is responsible for a correction
must write a note explaining how the error occurred and what will be done to
avoid a recurrence.
We strive for fairness and accuracy. Quick action is required in making
corrections — both ethically and legally. All corrections requests, no matter how
trivial, must be discussed with an editor. Every complaining party must get a
response, regardless of whether we publish a correction or clarification. If we
have given our readers a wrong impression about the reasonable view of a

principal of a story, there may be need for a clarification. Every effort should be
made to set the record straight, not just to correct errors of fact.
For instance, if we are given an incorrect telephone number and publish it, we
should assume institutional responsibility for the error, because we should have
called and checked it.
Corrections format:
? Corrections must contain the day of publication and the page number. All
corrections, regardless of the section in which they occur, will appear on A2.
Corrections from the editorial and opinion section should appear on A2, as well
as in the editorial and opinion section.
? Repeat the error only if the information is needed for clarity. For example: The
Pizza Hut robbed Tuesday night is at Broadway and Kolb, not Broadway and
Pantano as stated in a story on B1 Wednesday. Another example: The photo on
C3 Thursday was not Amanda Smith. Pictured was Mary Jones.
? If clarity is not in question, we need not repeat the error. For example, if we
misspell someone’s name, we need only correct the spelling, not repeat the
misspelling in the correction.
? If an item being corrected is exceptionally long or unwieldy — a recipe that left
out an ingredient or a comic strip that ran out of sequence, for example — the
recipe or correct strip need not appear on A2. However, a correction must run on
A2 noting the error and referring to the corrected item elsewhere in the paper.
Unless the error is especially grievous, we need not apologize in the correction.
Excerpts
Excerpt from published works only for purposes of criticism or review of the work
itself. To publish more than a few lines requires permission from whoever has the
publishing rights. With the exception of reviews, do not excerpt from copyrighted
works — stories, books, songs — without first obtaining permission. Limit
reproduction of syndicated cartoon characters to when we are illustrating a story
about specific characters, the artist or the genre. If asked, you should be able to
clearly explain why you had a need to quote as much copyrighted material as
you did.
Fabrication
Deceiving readers by fabrication is prohibited. Care must be taken in retelling
events so that it is clear to the reader that the event was not witnessed firsthand.
Fabrications in non-news stories, such as columns and features, must be
obvious to the reader. Fabrication also includes representing yourself as other
than representing the Star or StarNet.
Fairness
Every effort should be made to obtain a prompt, complete reply when an
accusation is made against an individual, company or institution. We must make
significant efforts to reach anyone who may be portrayed in a negative way, and
we must give them a reasonable amount of time to get back to us before we
publish. What is “reasonable’’ may depend of the urgency and competitiveness of
the story. If we are unable to obtain comment, we should say that and explain
3/2006
8
what effort we made to contact the person. Similar play will be given for initial
accusations and for their resolution. Include rebuttals in the main or deck portion
of headlines as well as in the early paragraphs of a story and always before it
jumps from the cover page of a section front.
Unfairness sometimes can be hard to spot. An “anatomy’’ of a crime, for
example, may include a paragraph or two dredging up background that someone
for years has been trying to live down. Beware. Subtle putdowns also can hide
cleverly in humor pieces, unnoticed among the chuckles. In profiles, a hurt can
slip through with the flick of a short verb (swills, slurps) or as a “colorful’’ modifier
(skittish eyes, deep-grooved wrinkles).
To avoid any suggestion that someone is being judged before a trial, do not use
phrases such as these: indicted for murder, arrested for arson, accused
murderer. The word “for’’ convicts and the word “accused’’ does not alter the
definition of murderer. Instead use “indicted on a charge of murder,’’ “arrested on
suspicion of arson.’’ We use the latter because at the time of the arrest the
charge is not formal.
Always specify the source of an accusation, such as a court record, a grand jury
indictment or a statement by a public official.
The word “allegedly’’ is no defense against libel, especially if we seem to be
doing the alleging.
Wrong: Jones allegedly set fire to the house, then shot Green.
Right: Police charge that Jones set fire to the house, then shot Green.
There is a difference between the meanings of innocent and not guilty. Pleas

I still don't get it guys and gals, the animosity towards Hansen. At games I've seen him a few times on the sidelines, or at football preseason practices he's on the sidelines, that's about the extent of ever seeing or knowing the guy. What he did was peanuts in the big picture of things. Now I get in general there are those out there who personally took offense to his writings and doings and that in today's culture you must be fired for doing anything wrong by the social lynch mob. He made mistakes. To err is human. Any one of us has, and I just didn't view it as that big of deal, especially what he wrote.

To me he only had one controversial article, the first one when things were breaking, and I took the phrase unless this is a monumental misunderstanding to be a qualifier of the whole article. Maybe that wasn't strong enough for folks I guess. Maybe shame on alot of us for initially blindingly trusting an ESPN article that Friday night. And others of you wanted to see him crying and sobbing on his knees in forgiveness as the only acceptable level of apology. His editors didn't view it as a fire-able offense, didn't seem like it to me either and others wrote in supporting him. He made an acceptable level of apology given his culpability, and to me it's time to move on. Maybe the trust eroded somewhat, but maybe this will refocus him going forward as he finishes out his career.