Page 22 of 28
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:09 pm
by Alieberman
CalStateTempe wrote:UAEebs86 wrote:I think MAO finally shut down the free boards.
why? still works for me.
I just checked over there and I don't see free boards anymore.
Ding Dong the Witch is Dead.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:09 pm
by FreeSpiritCat
I can still get to the free boards but I have to use a direct link, not from the home page.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:10 pm
by UAEebs86
CalStateTempe wrote:UAEebs86 wrote:I think MAO finally shut down the free boards.
why? still works for me.
When I click on Forums, I see The Wire and Message Boards.
When I click on Message Boards all I see are 4 forums, all premium.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:10 pm
by UAEebs86
So he took the link down I guess?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:14 pm
by FreeSpiritCat
UAEebs86 wrote:So he took the link down I guess?
I Googled GoAzcats forums and I get to the free board.
http://forum.goazcats.com/index.php
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:45 pm
by Merkin
JMarkJohns wrote:Somebody locked every "recent" thread in the football forum.
It's like he's lost his mind.
That is frickin' weird. Basketball is unlocked.
Maybe it was AZCAT49, is a mod in the FB forum, same with RCWildCat. Just didn't want to watch it anymore.

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:51 pm
by FreeSpiritCat
Only about the first 3 pages of threads are locked. Weird!
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:00 pm
by JMarkJohns
Catintheheat wrote:Only about the first 3 pages of threads are locked. Weird!
Nope. I went back a year. Almost every threat from last year this time to present is locked. Roughly 2 dozen at random threads are not.
It's really peculiar.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:02 pm
by UAEebs86
JMarkJohns wrote:Catintheheat wrote:Only about the first 3 pages of threads are locked. Weird!
Nope. I went back a year. Almost every threat from last year this time to present is locked. Roughly 2 dozen at random threads are not.
It's really peculiar.
And he removed all the links on all his web pages to the free boards (without removing the boards themselves).
So no one new is ever going to find the free boards. Probably just one more step in shutting them down for good.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:12 pm
by JMarkJohns
There hasn't been a non-sarcastic, non-derogatory, or non-inquisitive post made there since September. Everyone left, even those who found no fault in what went down. No sports talk. Only threads on what happened and why. Not good for business. So....
MAO gets his hope: Death Of Life
This transition has been a bit slower than I'd thought initially, but we have the community. We will make this transition work, then see how it can grow.
To paraphrase Christy Brown, fuck all forms of message boards that's not 100% commitment.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:16 pm
by azgreg
Everything is unlocked for me.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:17 pm
by JMarkJohns
azgreg wrote:Everything is unlocked for me.
In the Wildcat Football forum?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:28 pm
by Longhorned
Everything is unlocked for me in the football forum
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:30 pm
by Chicat
Locked for me.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:33 pm
by PieceOfMeat
I didn't log in, but when I went to TOS and looked as a guest (after adjusting the setting to show old posts, since noone has posted in forever

) all of the threads that show up are locked
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:34 pm
by Longhorned
I didn't know there was a selective locking feature. Looks like MAO loves me more than some of you. I might send him some muffins.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:37 pm
by JMarkJohns
All the weirder if the threads are inconsistently locked, at random, in only one forum, for just random posters.
Only reasons I even click back is to make sure any cry for help is met with a link to this place.
No Poster Left Behind
GOAZCATS is dead to me.
I wouldn't post there if he paid me.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:38 pm
by JMarkJohns
Longhorned wrote:I didn't know there was a selective locking feature. Looks like MAO loves me more than some of you. I might send him some muffins.
you suck...

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:38 pm
by CalStateTempe
not locked. in crowd, i guess.

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:41 pm
by JMarkJohns
CalStateTempe wrote:not locked. in crowd, i guess.

Ya'll just weren't committed enough to the cause to get noticed as threats, is all...

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:42 pm
by JMarkJohns
It appears I still have posting and new thread creation privileges in the quirky forum, so the locked threads just seems really stupid.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:03 pm
by scumdevils86
Weird
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 7:34 am
by Longhorned
JMarkJohns wrote:CalStateTempe wrote:not locked. in crowd, i guess.

Ya'll just weren't committed enough to the cause to get noticed as threats, is all...

We should have beared down harder.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 1:23 pm
by gumby
Just tell me the "Smack Your Forehead" thread lives. Put a lot of work into that.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:26 pm
by JMarkJohns
I'm I the only one who read Suqma's "Mao" thread to the tune of the Meow Mix jingle?

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 11:37 pm
by Daryl Zero
Longhorned wrote:JMarkJohns wrote:CalStateTempe wrote:not locked. in crowd, i guess.

Ya'll just weren't committed enough to the cause to get noticed as threats, is all...

We should have beared down harder.
Sitting or standing?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 11:47 pm
by 77HoyaCat4Ever
Daryl Zero wrote:Longhorned wrote:JMarkJohns wrote:CalStateTempe wrote:not locked. in crowd, i guess.

Ya'll just weren't committed enough to the cause to get noticed as threats, is all...

We should have beared down harder.
Sitting or standing?
You don't know squat . . .
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 10:32 am
by JMarkJohns
Before the plug was pulled, I went ahead and spent time visiting almost every recently active visitor profile, to capture the extent MAO went to discredit me, this site, etc. Let's just say I'm pretty shocked at the findings.
He edited visitor messages from years ago, having nothing to do with this site or what happened.
Moronically, he didn't edit every message, leaving me dozens of messages to prove initial content, while at the same time providing dozens more of edited to proof his asshaterry.
I'll randomly post some favorites of mine. Some that reference posters specifically.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 10:48 am
by JMarkJohns
A few I have sorted...

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 10:51 am
by JMarkJohns
Some older posts he edited

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 10:56 am
by JMarkJohns
BTW, I am a roaring tiger
a few (of several dozen) that claim this site is in dire need of funds or that we'll strong-arm members into costly charges.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 12:40 pm
by Chicat
It might have mattered . . . if anyone visited that site.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:42 pm
by JMarkJohns
Now I use the rep feature. Can't edit those.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:47 pm
by FreeSpiritCat
JMarkJohns wrote:Now I use the rep feature. Can't edit those.
The problem is people aren't notified they have rep, so they have to look at it. I remember sending rep to Flipper and Officer Craig, but I have my doubts if they ever saw it. The best solution is to finish the migration so others see us when they Google.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 2:13 pm
by PieceOfMeat
I'd sue his ass, if I were JMJ and I had the time to waste and a lawyer friend who'd do it pro bono.
::::
oh and why'd he edit your posts to point towards TOOS (that OTHER other site) with the drug dealer running it? are they in cahoots now?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 2:18 pm
by JMarkJohns
PieceOfMeat wrote:I'd sue his ass, if I were JMJ and I had the time to waste and a lawyer friend who'd do it pro bono.
::::
oh and why'd he edit your posts to point towards TOOS (that OTHER other site) with the drug dealer running it? are they in cahoots now?
I have no idea. He's seriously unhinged. What sucks most is it doesn't say by whom it was edited, unlike posts, so there's plausible deniability. Stupid.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 2:20 pm
by FreeSpiritCat
PieceOfMeat wrote:I'd sue his ass, if I were JMJ and I had the time to waste and a lawyer friend who'd do it pro bono.
::::
oh and why'd he edit your posts to point towards TOOS (that OTHER other site) with the drug dealer running it? are they in cahoots now?
I agree about the lawsuit. That is definitely a defamation of character. Although I doubt anyone would believe it, or the few who do see it. As far as linking to the other TOS site I think it's more out of resentment and spite to make JMJ look bad. Mao has taken this very personal and must lead a miserable life. He ought to be pitied in a Scrooge kind of way.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:43 pm
by PieceOfMeat
JMarkJohns wrote:PieceOfMeat wrote:I'd sue his ass, if I were JMJ and I had the time to waste and a lawyer friend who'd do it pro bono.
::::
oh and why'd he edit your posts to point towards TOOS (that OTHER other site) with the drug dealer running it? are they in cahoots now?
I have no idea. He's seriously unhinged. What sucks most is it doesn't say by whom it was edited, unlike posts, so there's plausible deniability. Stupid.
I'd be pretty shocked if there's no server-side log of it being edited. Or maybe that's just me watching too much fictional computer stuff on movies/tv
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:39 pm
by Merkin
#2 baby!
http://www.collegesports-fans.com/colle ... oards.html
Site, sponsor, activity rating
WildcatAuthority.com - Scout - 7
Bear Down Wildcats - Independent - 6
PointGuardU.com - Independent - 5
Wildcat Sports Report - 247 Sports - 5
GoAZCats.com - Rivals - 3
ArizonaSportsFans.com - Independent - 1
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:54 pm
by PieceOfMeat
cool, when do we get our bonus checks?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:58 pm
by ASUHATER!
More activity than pgu haha
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:51 pm
by gumby
So it's settled? We're all headed back?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:09 pm
by Alieberman
Who goes by the handle "GOAZCATS.com Headlines"?
That guy is trying really hard to keep those forums alive. Has anyone told him about this site?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:45 pm
by Chicat
gumby wrote:So it's settled? We're all headed back?
Well, everyone except ScumDevils86...
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:46 pm
by azgreg
Chicat wrote:gumby wrote:So it's settled? We're all headed back?
Well, everyone except ScumDevils86...

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:09 pm
by ASUHATER!
gumby wrote:So it's settled? We're all headed back?
Did I miss something?
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:13 pm
by mytwocents
ASUHATER! wrote:gumby wrote:So it's settled? We're all headed back?
Did I miss something?
Pretty sure he's joking considering Merk's post a few posts before

Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:29 pm
by scumdevils86
Chicat wrote:gumby wrote:So it's settled? We're all headed back?
Well, everyone except ScumDevils86...
Awh hell.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:32 pm
by gumby
ASUHATER! wrote:gumby wrote:So it's settled? We're all headed back?
Did I miss something?
Sorry. Thought I was at the ex-con site.
Re: TOS Discussion
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:24 pm
by UAtrue
Merkin wrote:#2 baby!
http://www.collegesports-fans.com/colle ... oards.html
Site, sponsor, activity rating
WildcatAuthority.com - Scout - 7
Bear Down Wildcats - Independent - 6
PointGuardU.com - Independent - 5
Wildcat Sports Report - 247 Sports - 5
GoAZCats.com - Rivals - 3
ArizonaSportsFans.com - Independent - 1
Wonder what their scale is based on? What is a "3"? Just went over to TOS and there hasn't been a single post in 3 weeks. On a cursory review, it looks like only a handful of posts over the past 2-3 months.