Re: let's talk '18
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 6:45 am
Going to need to strike gold with grad transfers and JUCO recruits. Miller has before no reason he can't again.
U.P. Zona Fan wrote:I wonder if vasa pucica from northeastern would want to play here?
He already transferred from San Diego once, is he going to transfer twice? Any rules preventing him?ChooChooCat wrote:You guys want another grad transfer PG? I'm on my phone, but look up Vasa Pusica at Northeastern. Look at where he's from and the HS he went to along with his stats of course.
Would be great. But has me thinking, recruits currently don't want to come here, why is it different with transfers?ChooChooCat wrote:This is the absolute dream grad transfer. I doubt he does, but good christ give him to us please.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... /mike-daum" target="_blank
That last paragraph is the big thing. Grad transfers are here for a year. If they can get playing time and exposure that year, that's what matters. They don't need to worry about being recruited over or whether a postseason ban drops in their sophomore year.prh wrote:A lot of grad transfers are actually the 2nd transfer. The first transfer gives them the 5th year of eligibility, and they are free to transfer as a grad student.
As for why transfers might want to come when recruits don't, this would be my guess:
A grad transfer like Daum might be looking to prove himself against top level competition, in order to get drafted. He's not currently in 2-round mock drafts, so if he wants to play in the league, a 1 year audition at Arizona would do wonders for him.
A grad transfer who isn't good enough for the league, from a small school, might just want the experience of playing at a blue blood power. Especially a PG who would definitely be playing a lot.
Any small school grad transfer might want a year at a big school to go play in the tourney, like TJ did (although he had more years, same concept).
In general, grad transfers just don't care about the same things as recruits. They know the NCAA won't move quickly enough to give a postseason ban next year, and they don't care about later years. They don't need a stable situation for 3 years like recruits do. They just want to ball and move on.
Jesus Christ Beach.Beachcat97 wrote:Is Daum just a name we’re throwing out, or is there actually reason to think he’d have interest in AZ?
Nope. He's a Redshirt Junior currently because he already sat out due to transferring. As long as he graduates after this semester (he's a senior academically) then he'd be eligible to grad transfer and play immediately.NYCat wrote:U.P. Zona Fan wrote:I wonder if vasa pucica from northeastern would want to play here?He already transferred from San Diego once, is he going to transfer twice? Any rules preventing him?ChooChooCat wrote:You guys want another grad transfer PG? I'm on my phone, but look up Vasa Pusica at Northeastern. Look at where he's from and the HS he went to along with his stats of course.
I mean if Daum wanted to grad transfer he would have every major program calling his name, so he's a longshot, but look at the schools these guys are playing at. Not many are going to turn down Arizona when they say "we can offer you a lot of minutes at Arizona." We may have Herpes via ESPN, but we're still a major god damn name in the world of this sport and that's an intriguing selling point for any guy who wants to see the limelight that comes with being on the big stage at Arizona.NYCat wrote:Would be great. But has me thinking, recruits currently don't want to come here, why is it different with transfers?ChooChooCat wrote:This is the absolute dream grad transfer. I doubt he does, but good christ give him to us please.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... /mike-daum" target="_blank
This.prh wrote:A lot of grad transfers are actually the 2nd transfer. The first transfer gives them the 5th year of eligibility, and they are free to transfer as a grad student.
As for why transfers might want to come when recruits don't, this would be my guess:
A grad transfer like Daum might be looking to prove himself against top level competition, in order to get drafted. He's not currently in 2-round mock drafts, so if he wants to play in the league, a 1 year audition at Arizona would do wonders for him.
A grad transfer who isn't good enough for the league, from a small school, might just want the experience of playing at a blue blood power. Especially a PG who would definitely be playing a lot.
Any small school grad transfer might want a year at a big school to go play in the tourney, like TJ did (although he had more years, same concept).
In general, grad transfers just don't care about the same things as recruits. They know the NCAA won't move quickly enough to give a postseason ban next year, and they don't care about later years. They don't need a stable situation for 3 years like recruits do. They just want to ball and move on.
That's what people said about Rick Pitino, but anyone can come at any time. It isn't over until it's over.NYCat wrote:Doubt Williams ends up coming at this point
That's why grad transfers are getting heavy play. They patch a hole and don't fill a spot for the long term if we get stability back.NYCat wrote:Yeah but that time we raided USCs recruits after they got sanctions. This time Arizona is the team being raided. Reef to UCLA & Williams flirting with Bol/Oregon. Whatever happens we shouldn't take kids who aren't good enough just to fill scholarship spots, because that's how you make a bad situation worse.
Call me crazy, but I’m sorta looking forward to being an underdog next year. I’m sure we’ll all miss Ayton, but those 8/9 seeds don’t have the same soaring expectations as we’re used to. It’ll be fun seeing our young guys develop and make a run for a bid.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I know this isn't likely to repeat the 2009 SC exodus, but this year is a similar scrambling mentality for what's out there. We don't have a ton of scholarship guys, but the upside is that if we do return Barcello, Randolph, Akot, Smith, Lee and Jeter, those guys are all legit options who you think can be rotation players on a 8 or 9 seed.
...and we'll still beat ASU and watch Hurley have a conniption.Beachcat97 wrote: Call me crazy, but I’m sorta looking forward to being an underdog next year. I’m sure we’ll all miss Ayton, but those 8/9 seeds don’t have the same soaring expectations as we’re used to. It’ll be fun seeing our young guys develop and make a run for a bid.
But we'll all be a year closer to own eternally extinguished consciousness, thanks to our inevitable deaths. And there will be no basketball for us then, and no basketball to remember. So I'm not looking forward to that.Beachcat97 wrote:Call me crazy, but I’m sorta looking forward to being an underdog next year. I’m sure we’ll all miss Ayton, but those 8/9 seeds don’t have the same soaring expectations as we’re used to. It’ll be fun seeing our young guys develop and make a run for a bid.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I know this isn't likely to repeat the 2009 SC exodus, but this year is a similar scrambling mentality for what's out there. We don't have a ton of scholarship guys, but the upside is that if we do return Barcello, Randolph, Akot, Smith, Lee and Jeter, those guys are all legit options who you think can be rotation players on a 8 or 9 seed.
I believe there's basketball in the afterlife. For good fans, heaven is watching your team pull UConn magical runs every year. Bad fans get an eternal loop of Arizona/Illinois and you're always rooting for Arizona.Longhorned wrote:But we'll all be a year closer to own eternally extinguished consciousness, thanks to our inevitable deaths. And there will be no basketball for us then, and no basketball to remember. So I'm not looking forward to that.Beachcat97 wrote:Call me crazy, but I’m sorta looking forward to being an underdog next year. I’m sure we’ll all miss Ayton, but those 8/9 seeds don’t have the same soaring expectations as we’re used to. It’ll be fun seeing our young guys develop and make a run for a bid.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I know this isn't likely to repeat the 2009 SC exodus, but this year is a similar scrambling mentality for what's out there. We don't have a ton of scholarship guys, but the upside is that if we do return Barcello, Randolph, Akot, Smith, Lee and Jeter, those guys are all legit options who you think can be rotation players on a 8 or 9 seed.
I will forever wake up in nightsweats thinking that this should've been our roster next year:Longhorned wrote:But we'll all be a year closer to own eternally extinguished consciousness, thanks to our inevitable deaths. And there will be no basketball for us then, and no basketball to remember. So I'm not looking forward to that.Beachcat97 wrote:Call me crazy, but I’m sorta looking forward to being an underdog next year. I’m sure we’ll all miss Ayton, but those 8/9 seeds don’t have the same soaring expectations as we’re used to. It’ll be fun seeing our young guys develop and make a run for a bid.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I know this isn't likely to repeat the 2009 SC exodus, but this year is a similar scrambling mentality for what's out there. We don't have a ton of scholarship guys, but the upside is that if we do return Barcello, Randolph, Akot, Smith, Lee and Jeter, those guys are all legit options who you think can be rotation players on a 8 or 9 seed.
If Book solicited a bribe from any other agent in the world, this would be our lineup. It just isn't fair.ChooChooCat wrote:I will forever wake up in nightsweats thinking that this should've been our roster next year:Longhorned wrote:But we'll all be a year closer to own eternally extinguished consciousness, thanks to our inevitable deaths. And there will be no basketball for us then, and no basketball to remember. So I'm not looking forward to that.Beachcat97 wrote:Call me crazy, but I’m sorta looking forward to being an underdog next year. I’m sure we’ll all miss Ayton, but those 8/9 seeds don’t have the same soaring expectations as we’re used to. It’ll be fun seeing our young guys develop and make a run for a bid.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I know this isn't likely to repeat the 2009 SC exodus, but this year is a similar scrambling mentality for what's out there. We don't have a ton of scholarship guys, but the upside is that if we do return Barcello, Randolph, Akot, Smith, Lee and Jeter, those guys are all legit options who you think can be rotation players on a 8 or 9 seed.
Jahvon Quinerly
Brandon Williams
Brandon Randolph
Emmanuel Akot
Nassir Little
Ira Lee
Shareef O'Neal
Chase Jeter
Bol Bol
Alex Barcello
Dylan Smith
NIGHT. TERRORS.
Define "legit and 100% CLEAN"?NYCat wrote:If it makes people feel better. Coach K got the top 3 recruits who are all SFs and did it totally legit and 100% CLEAN.
This is why I pray every day that the recruit Miller mentioned a money offer for is Bagley and that somehow we get cleared and Duke gets implicated in one fell swoop. I don't dare dream that would be possible because it would be the single greatest moment of my sports fan life.NYCat wrote:If it makes people feel better. Coach K got the top 3 recruits who are all SFs and did it totally legit and 100% CLEAN.
Don't ruin my dreams. If my wife asks me if I'm in "the mood," even if I'm really not, I just have to think of the scenario where Miller gets exculpated as K goes down...and I'm in the mood.Beachcat97 wrote:Think Duke is too big to fail.
The wife asking is enough to put me in the mood.Spaceman Spiff wrote: Don't ruin my dreams. If my wife asks me if I'm in "the mood," even if I'm really not, I just have to think of the scenario where Miller gets exculpated as K goes down...and I'm in the mood.
Your mother never complains.RiseAndFire wrote:Spiff gets boners dreaming about Miller. Why is that not surprising?
Spaceman Spiff wrote:Your mother never complains.RiseAndFire wrote:Spiff gets boners dreaming about Miller. Why is that not surprising?
Your mother never minds when I want to go man to man with her, Trebek! It does encourage penetration, though, so you're right about that.YoDeFoe wrote:Spaceman Spiff wrote:Your mother never complains.RiseAndFire wrote:Spiff gets boners dreaming about Miller. Why is that not surprising?
The Connery gif sealed the deal. Bye Bye RF.Longhorned wrote:Now that RF got yo mama’d he has to leave the board, right?
I could live with Williams goiing elsewhere, but ASU...I would turn on him fast even when I try to be classy about this stuff.NYCat wrote:2018 but whatevs
Like details about how heavy the duffle bag isAZCatGirl wrote:
Please, please, please.AZCatGirl wrote:
Great point, Alie. Miller is staying, thank God. Just need that PG. Come on, BW!Alieberman wrote:I have no idea if he will come back, but the fact that Miller and his staff are still going after him makes me think Miller will really be back next year.
Fingers crossed
I'd like to nominate Williams as our DWill and Doutrive as our Solo.Spaceman Spiff wrote:This is selfish as anything, but furthering my 2009 class comparison, Brandon Williams could be another Derrick Williams or Solomon Hill. With the instability, having a really good multi year player to lay the groundwork to move beyond this FBI stuff would be huge.
Having that guy also be a PG would be equally huge.
I'm fine with that. If they wanted to both be DWill, I could like that too.ChooChooCat wrote:I'd like to nominate Williams as our DWill and Doutrive as our Solo.Spaceman Spiff wrote:This is selfish as anything, but furthering my 2009 class comparison, Brandon Williams could be another Derrick Williams or Solomon Hill. With the instability, having a really good multi year player to lay the groundwork to move beyond this FBI stuff would be huge.
Having that guy also be a PG would be equally huge.
If he doesn't come I die.Spaceman Spiff wrote:This is selfish as anything, but furthering my 2009 class comparison, Brandon Williams could be another Derrick Williams or Solomon Hill. With the instability, having a really good multi year player to lay the groundwork to move beyond this FBI stuff would be huge.
Having that guy also be a PG would be equally huge.