Bear Down Wildcats

Posted: **Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:27 pm**

azcat49 wrote:Michigan is,an outstanding g team IMO. They share the ball so well

IMO a probable one seed for the tournament. They beat THREE top 25 teams by double digits on a down year. I believe they can pretty much beat anyone. I've always said that Beilein is the best coach in the country.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:39 am**

Technical loss for KU at home against Stanford.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:31 am**

UAdevil wrote:Technical loss for KU at home against Stanford.

OT against the tenth best team in a middle of the road conference? Sad...

Posted: **Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:16 pm**

How did I miss that Furman beat Villanova at Villanova like 2 weeks ago?

Furman is ranked

Posted: **Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:37 pm**

ASUHATER! wrote:How did I miss that Furman beat Villanova at Villanova like 2 weeks ago?

Furman is ranked

They are 8 & 0 with wins against 2 of last year's final 4 including the champion.
Who else has done that this year?

They should be ranked.

So I guess we will see them in the 5 12 game.

Posted: **Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:41 pm**

I can only see Villanova as a big win there. Their other wins are Bob Jones University, Loyola Illinois, Gardner-Webb, North Greenville, Southern Wesleyan, UNC Asheville and Western Carolina.

Posted: **Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:45 pm**

They beat sister Jean, it's a sign!

Posted: **Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:50 pm**

Watching the last moments of the close game between Oklahoma and Notre Dame

Posted: **Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:27 pm**

Alabama lost at home to Georgia State, 83-80.

Posted: **Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:48 pm**

Way too much time left but the Squirrels just lost the lead to Northwestern.

Posted: **Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:48 pm**

Irish27 wrote:Alabama lost at home to Georgia State, 83-80.

If we lose to them, with how weak the PAC is, that might be our ticket to the NIT.

Posted: **Thu Dec 06, 2018 6:12 pm**

Cyclones v Hawkeyes right now.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:29 pm**

Ahahahaha . . . That’s karma for sinking a “game-winning” 3 after such a horrible offensive sequence.

*Seton Hall v Kentucky

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:34 pm**

ByJoveByJingle wrote:Ahahahaha . . . That’s karma for sinking a “game-winning” 3 after such a horrible offensive sequence.

*Seton Hall v Kentucky

First Seton Hall made this shot

UK then tied the game

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:34 pm**

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:04 pm**

Down goes Kentucky! Here is the winning basket in overtime by Seton Hall. Great ball movement.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:18 pm**

Absolutely beautiful

So calm, so composed

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:31 pm**

Wisconsin-Marquette bringing everything these early non-conf rivalry games can hope for: Overtime, back and forth, star power (Happ & Howard), rowdy crowd, and lively environment. Marquette beats Wisconsin.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:38 pm**

Kansas trailing NM St by 2 at the half at home.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:45 pm**

Go Aggies! Love Las Cruces!! Mesquite hummocks, blowing sand and all.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:47 pm**

They are quick and relentless. Looks like Kansas might not be a contender in the WAC.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:51 pm**

ByJoveByJingle wrote:They are quick and relentless. Looks like Kansas might not be a contender in the WAC.

OK, so much for watching Oregon. But you know as soon as I start watching the Aggies they are going to crater. You know that don't you?

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:17 pm**

Completely shocking, but Kansas is in double bonus and only has 4 fouls against them

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:23 pm**

Unheard of in Lawrence, absolutely unprecedented.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:28 pm**

Did it or didn't it?

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:34 pm**

Definite technical loss.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:34 pm**

ByJoveByJingle wrote:Definite technical loss.

+1

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:37 pm**

ByJoveByJingle wrote:Definite technical loss.

Two technical losses already this season.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:47 pm**

dovecanyoncat wrote:Unheard of in Lawrence, absolutely unprecedented.

Game was in Kansas City. A solid win to take home the WAC title. NMSU would beat Arizona by 20.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:48 pm**

Technical loss

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:56 pm**

Wouldn't be surprised if asu beat the chickenhawks in Tempe.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 9:03 pm**

enfuego wrote:
dovecanyoncat wrote:Unheard of in Lawrence, absolutely unprecedented.
Game was in Kansas City. A solid win to take home the WAC title. NMSU would beat Arizona by 20.

Geography makes hard a flaccid win? Your wife must.... oh well, never mind.

Posted: **Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:26 pm**

enfuego wrote:
dovecanyoncat wrote:Unheard of in Lawrence, absolutely unprecedented.
Game was in Kansas City. A solid win to take home the WAC title. NMSU would beat Arizona by 20.

Haha, this dude is funny.

This is not necessarily KU only but several teams are given huge advantages with NCAA regional or first round sites.

How many times has KU played in KC in the first round or played there to go to the FF? Same with Duke in MSG or UCLA at Staples?

Posted: **Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:00 am**

azcat49 wrote:
enfuego wrote:
dovecanyoncat wrote:Unheard of in Lawrence, absolutely unprecedented.
Game was in Kansas City. A solid win to take home the WAC title. NMSU would beat Arizona by 20.

Haha, this dude is funny.

This is not necessarily KU only but several teams are given huge advantages with NCAA regional or first round sites.

How many times has KU played in KC in the first round or played there to go to the FF? Same with Duke in MSG or UCLA at Staples?

Or Duke/UNC in Greensboro or Charlotte?

Posted: **Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:44 pm**

Chicat wrote:
azcat49 wrote:
enfuego wrote:
dovecanyoncat wrote:Unheard of in Lawrence, absolutely unprecedented.
Game was in Kansas City. A solid win to take home the WAC title. NMSU would beat Arizona by 20.

Haha, this dude is funny.

This is not necessarily KU only but several teams are given huge advantages with NCAA regional or first round sites.

How many times has KU played in KC in the first round or played there to go to the FF? Same with Duke in MSG or UCLA at Staples?
Or Duke/UNC in Greensboro or Charlotte?

Or Arizona in Phoe... oh wait...Buffalo.

Posted: **Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:45 pm**

Chicat wrote:
Irish27 wrote:Alabama lost at home to Georgia State, 83-80.
If we lose to them, with how weak the PAC is, that might be our ticket to the NIT.

Bump.

Posted: **Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:53 pm**

enfuego wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Irish27 wrote:Alabama lost at home to Georgia State, 83-80.
If we lose to them, with how weak the PAC is, that might be our ticket to the NIT.
Bump.

Worry about your lone true road game in Dumpe.

Posted: **Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:17 pm**

Chicat wrote:
enfuego wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Irish27 wrote:Alabama lost at home to Georgia State, 83-80.
If we lose to them, with how weak the PAC is, that might be our ticket to the NIT.
Bump.
Worry about your lone true road game in Dumpe.

Are you crying???

Posted: **Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:47 pm**

enfuego wrote:
Chicat wrote:
enfuego wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Irish27 wrote:Alabama lost at home to Georgia State, 83-80.
If we lose to them, with how weak the PAC is, that might be our ticket to the NIT.
Bump.
Worry about your lone true road game in Dumpe.
Are you crying???

No

Are you still trolling this community? Dude, it’s literally been years. You need a hobby...

Posted: **Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:09 pm**

Villanova down 4 with 23.6 to play. Quinerly has not played.

Posted: **Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:22 pm**

Penn takes down Nova despite giant brain freeze with 1.1 left.

Posted: **Tue Dec 11, 2018 8:56 pm**

Spaceman Spiff wrote:Villanova down 4 with 23.6 to play. Quinerly has not played.

Posted: **Tue Dec 11, 2018 9:12 pm**

I really liked his game, but it seems pretty clear he'd be a 3/4 year guy. So....hey bud you wanna transfer here this summer?

Posted: **Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:57 am**

AZCatGirl wrote:
Spaceman Spiff wrote:Villanova down 4 with 23.6 to play. Quinerly has not played.

Yeah, I doubt he committed to Nova thinking he wouldn't play against Penn. We'll see how it goes from here, but a lot of people have talked about his lack of minutes.

Posted: **Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:18 am**

prh wrote:I really liked his game, but it seems pretty clear he'd be a 3/4 year guy. So....hey bud you wanna transfer here this summer?

I'd 100% take him. I always understood why he and Little did what they did after being named in the FBI complaint.

Traditional transfers who are talented, have hit a rough patch that beats some ego out, then we get a year to bring them in and develop them...I like those situations. Jeter is a good example.

Posted: **Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:56 am**

Spaceman Spiff wrote:
prh wrote:I really liked his game, but it seems pretty clear he'd be a 3/4 year guy. So....hey bud you wanna transfer here this summer?
I'd 100% take him. I always understood why he and Little did what they did after being named in the FBI complaint.

Traditional transfers who are talented, have hit a rough patch that beats some ego out, then we get a year to bring them in and develop them...I like those situations. Jeter is a good example.

Apparently JQ liked a tweet stating that he would be starting at Arizona right now earlier this week... then quickly deleted it. Nova fans are quite salty about this. Some want him gone. But I can totally see a Jeter-esque transformation if he does decide to go that route.

Posted: **Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:57 am**

But why would he want to come to a program whose coach actively seeks to thwart the careers of Offensively talented (and defensively challenged) freshmen?

Posted: **Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:13 am**

RawleArenas wrote:
Spaceman Spiff wrote:
prh wrote:I really liked his game, but it seems pretty clear he'd be a 3/4 year guy. So....hey bud you wanna transfer here this summer?
I'd 100% take him. I always understood why he and Little did what they did after being named in the FBI complaint.

Traditional transfers who are talented, have hit a rough patch that beats some ego out, then we get a year to bring them in and develop them...I like those situations. Jeter is a good example.
Apparently JQ liked a tweet stating that he would be starting at Arizona right now earlier this week... then quickly deleted it. Nova fans are quite salty about this. Some want him gone. But I can totally see a Jeter-esque transformation if he does decide to go that route.

If they don't want him, we're locked in with BWill and Nico next year, but after that, I'd be into JQ.

Is it really stunning he wouldn't be thrilled about going from all everything to zero minutes? I played basketball and I don't know any player truly happy not playing.

Posted: **Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:37 am**

http://www.villanovan.com/sports/jahvon ... dee6e.html" target="_blank

Posted: **Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:16 am**

damn, the paper picked up on it

Bear Down Wildcats

Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread

Re: Non-Pac-12 Game Thread