Understood, but is that a party size bag of Flaming Hot Cheetos I see in your cart?BearDown89 wrote:I resent the manipulation.

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Understood, but is that a party size bag of Flaming Hot Cheetos I see in your cart?BearDown89 wrote:I resent the manipulation.
Alieberman wrote:I'm firmly in the camp of "dirt don't hurt"
I'm the Dad that tells his kids to quickly pick up the food they dropped on the ground and eat it while the other parents look at me and my kids in disgust.
I'm Danish. I find this offensive.Longhorned wrote:And since I'm still trying to find where you people draw the line, is this okay as well? I had a roommate who clogged the toilet, plunged it, and then wrapped the morning newspaper around the plunger to carry it out of the bathroom to keep it from dripping everywhere. He then placed the wet newspaper on the dining table. Horrified, I put plastic bags over my hands and disposed of the newspaper, and then disinfected the table as best as one can. When my other roommate woke up, I gave her the bad news that we had to replace our dining table. Ignoring my plight, she retrieved the wet newspaper from the trash and proceeded to read it at the table while eating a danish.
This.Alieberman wrote:I'm firmly in the camp of "dirt don't hurt"
I'm the Dad that tells his kids to quickly pick up the food they dropped on the ground and eat it while the other parents look at me and my kids in disgust.
So you noticed that Mr. Clean didn't want to say anything about it. I'm often just sitting there, keeping all my own private thoughts to myself and talking about all kinds of interesting pleasantries. And all of the sudden the person I'm there with stops and says, "Okay. What did I do wrong now?" I'm stunned.gumby wrote:This.Alieberman wrote:I'm firmly in the camp of "dirt don't hurt"
I'm the Dad that tells his kids to quickly pick up the food they dropped on the ground and eat it while the other parents look at me and my kids in disgust.
Have an uber-antimicrobial neighbor who is the source of much entertainment (he's an extreme neatnik, too). When our kids were little, we had small place in the front yard where they could dig in the dirt and add water to make mud.
It was a kid magnet.
Mr. Clean would come over and pretend to converse with me on the porch while cringing at his kids having fun in the mud. He was so uncomfortable, but didn't want to say anything directly about it. So he'd suggest other things the kids could be doing.
We're not slobs, but we're not obsessed with germs either. And our kids didn't get sick with any greater frequency than other kids. The human body can adapt and handle it.
So relax, and worry about real problems, like your irrational obsessions and fears and what those are doing to your poor kids.
It's okay. I developed other skills to compensate.gumby wrote:Jesus. That's sad and sick. And communicable.
Sorry, man.
gumby wrote:This.Alieberman wrote:I'm firmly in the camp of "dirt don't hurt"
I'm the Dad that tells his kids to quickly pick up the food they dropped on the ground and eat it while the other parents look at me and my kids in disgust.
Have an uber-antimicrobial neighbor who is the source of much entertainment (he's an extreme neatnik, too). When our kids were little, we had small place in the front yard where they could dig in the dirt and add water to make mud.
It was a kid magnet.
Speaking of questionable career moves, I just emailed the president of his agency and the EVP of Marketing for the client and told them how disrespectful it was for him to cancel on us last minute and how they were missing out on a golden opportunity to corner the Chicago market all because of his ego and a silly power play.Puerco wrote:That wouldn't be a good career move. Nor would canceling the meeting...
Here's a book to add to your stack-in-progress:Chicat wrote:Speaking of questionable career moves, I just emailed the president of his agency and the EVP of Marketing for the client and told them how disrespectful it was for him to cancel on us last minute and how they were missing out on a golden opportunity to corner the Chicago market all because of his ego and a silly power play.Puerco wrote:That wouldn't be a good career move. Nor would canceling the meeting...
I could have a whole lot more time on my hands to post on the boards coming up here shortly...
Now onto step 2: Getting you and everyone else crammed into the gate. They say, "We're currently delayed two and a half hours, but please remain in the gating area. We could get the go-ahead at any minute and leave earlier." That never happens, and I don't even think it's possible. At the expense of your own comfort and relaxation, it's just a way to calm you with false hope.Alieberman wrote:This is now the 2nd time that American Airlines has texted me the moment I get to the airport that my flight is 2+ hours late
This certainly qualifies as something that pisses me off
It really is too bad that you had to go and preempt the only appropriate response.Alieberman wrote:Things are now getting comical here. So my plane is not here but my crew is.
The flight at the next gate over has a plane but no crew. (Their crew is on MY plane)
So now both these flights are delayed
I may not know jack shit about the airline industry... But shouldn't there be a way to get one of these flights moving?
I know shit about the airline industry...and have indeed seen that happen several times. People were told it was an hour + delay and not to leave the gate area...lo and behold they all wandered off and suddenly they had a change and a plane available so they boarded immediately. About 5 people missed the flight because they wandered off and didn't hear their name called 35 times to get back to the damn gate. I laughed.Longhorned wrote:Now onto step 2: Getting you and everyone else crammed into the gate. They say, "We're currently delayed two and a half hours, but please remain in the gating area. We could get the go-ahead at any minute and leave earlier." That never happens, and I don't even think it's possible. At the expense of your own comfort and relaxation, it's just a way to calm you with false hope.Alieberman wrote:This is now the 2nd time that American Airlines has texted me the moment I get to the airport that my flight is 2+ hours late
This certainly qualifies as something that pisses me off
And while they're texting us, why won't they text us to let us know that our bag has been displaced? Bags are tracked by the bar code. Why not let us know in advance that it didn't make it onto the right plane? Why make us go to baggage claim and wait the whole thing out, and then have to inquire?
Not always. Airlines don't have unlimited extra planes laying around in every airport. If there isn't a plane there, there's a darn good reason why not. They don't create delays or a missing plane just for the hell of it because it's fun.Alieberman wrote:Things are now getting comical here. So my plane is not here but my crew is.
The flight at the next gate over has a plane but no crew. (Their crew is on MY plane)
So now both these flights are delayed
I may not know jack shit about the airline industry... But shouldn't there be a way to get one of these flights moving?
I know they don't have spare planes laying around.... They do have a plane.... And a crew.... But they ar scheduled for different destinations. I just don't know why they can't change this from 2 delayed flights to 1 delayed flightASUHATER! wrote:Not always. Airlines don't have unlimited extra planes laying around in every airport. If there isn't a plane there, there's a darn good reason why not. They don't create delays or a missing plane just for the hell of it because it's fun.Alieberman wrote:Things are now getting comical here. So my plane is not here but my crew is.
The flight at the next gate over has a plane but no crew. (Their crew is on MY plane)
So now both these flights are delayed
I may not know jack shit about the airline industry... But shouldn't there be a way to get one of these flights moving?
You sound like salty in the police brutality thread. j/kASUHATER! wrote:There's always a reason. Maybe one flight crew can't go on the other plane because it will put them over their allowed flight time because of the flight destination, maybe one plane needs a certain kind of crew, there could be dozens of valid reasons.
They did a special on 20/20 like 15 years ago that investigated the over-scheduling of domestic flights without the supporting infrastructure. This was back when they backed the plane out of the gate and let it sit for unlimited time on the tarmac. Retired pilots being interviewed said that pilots were instructed on the false explanations to give to the passengers, with the understanding that if you were caught being candid, you'd get called to the chief pilot's office to have a conversation.ASUHATER! wrote:Not at all haha. There is always a reason for such delays, and nearly all have to do with the safety of passengers and or crew.
holy shit, Ari this is the fucking worst --- now try leaving the house at 5am to get to LAX by 6:15 for a 7:15 flight, clearing security and getting the text that your American Airlines flight is delayed.Alieberman wrote:This is now the 2nd time that American Airlines has texted me the moment I get to the airport that my flight is 2+ hours late
This certainly qualifies as something that pisses me off
Sounds like a Louis CK skit. Anyways, with all this technology why can't they figure out a way so everybody can have 2 armrest to themselves.scumdevils86 wrote:Think of the amazing fact that you get to pay a reasonable price to soar thousands of miles across the country in an aluminum tube (with television, internet and booze) in just a few hours with almost perfect safety. Then reconsider the level of annoyance when the plane is delayed just a few hours! Methinks the outrage is not warranted.
Thank you Louis CK.... Yes air travel is amazing..... It still doesn't mean they can't do a better job. Some airlines are much better than others. I wish I wasn't stuck with AA because they are the worstscumdevils86 wrote:Think of the amazing fact that you get to pay a reasonable price to soar thousands of miles across the country in an aluminum tube (with television, internet and booze) in just a few hours with almost perfect safety. Then reconsider the level of annoyance when the plane is delayed just a few hours! Methinks the outrage is not warranted.
good stuffLonghorned wrote:I've found this site really helpful:
http://www.seatguru.com/
Every flight, every plane.
Not all seats are the same.
People that do that are the fucking lowest form of human. Would you scream at a tollbooth operator because you were stuck in traffic?Alieberman wrote:Thank you Louis CK.... Yes air travel is amazing..... It still doesn't mean they can't do a better job. Some airlines are much better than others. I wish I wasn't stuck with AA because they are the worstscumdevils86 wrote:Think of the amazing fact that you get to pay a reasonable price to soar thousands of miles across the country in an aluminum tube (with television, internet and booze) in just a few hours with almost perfect safety. Then reconsider the level of annoyance when the plane is delayed just a few hours! Methinks the outrage is not warranted.
And for the record, I may get pissed off and annoyed but I pretty much keep it to myself and don't take out my frustrations on the gate agents and flight attendants
It seems airlines are slowly enforcing carry-on sizes back to normal levels. It really got out of control over the past decade with passengers bringing bigger and bigger bags onboard (noted - due to baggage fees I'm sure). Once again, everyone in the gen pop think they're so damn special they can bring an over-stuffed and oversized rolling suitcase onboard that they think the flight attendant will magically wedge into the overhead bin somehow, ruining it for everyone else in the future that is barely over the size restriction, as I'm guessing you were. It had to happen though. Humans abuse everything.Longhorned wrote:What is it with the carry-on luggage limitation on Lufthansa recently? I'm ready for them to make me take off my pants and check in those as well.
No, that's not it at all. I'm talking about the standard 6" thick, 19" length, 16" wide carry-on roller. The size that's made to meet current requirements.pokinmik wrote:It seems airlines are slowly enforcing carry-on sizes back to normal levels. It really got out of control over the past decade with passengers bringing bigger and bigger bags onboard (noted - due to baggage fees I'm sure). Once again, everyone in the gen pop think they're so damn special they can bring an over-stuffed and oversized rolling suitcase onboard that they think the flight attendant will magically wedge into the overhead bin somehow, ruining it for everyone else in the future that is barely over the size restriction, as I'm guessing you were. It had to happen though. Humans abuse everything.Longhorned wrote:What is it with the carry-on luggage limitation on Lufthansa recently? I'm ready for them to make me take off my pants and check in those as well.
In my opinion, the accepted size of the carry-on bag for domestic flights should set the social expectations for travelers. I'm not squeezing a bag that's bigger than the size allowed (which is a courtesy thing, as you observe), and I'm not checking in a bag, so the world has to live with the limitations of whatever I can fit in my bag. If your wedding requires me to have six different changes of clothes for six different events, then I'm only going to one of your wedding events.pokinmik wrote:I assumed you were barely over the requirements you listed above, and they made you check the bag. You must have beef with the size requirements? Or my bad, I'm not following what happened in your situation.
The carry-on concept started as a laptop bag, small backpack, big purse, tiny roller bag, etc and then people (like Longhorned haha) got out of control! Now they're busting out tape measures and shit at the gate.
I only have carry-on issues in the US, so I assume anything you bring on that's okay at home should be okay on Lufthansa or anywhere else.Longhorned wrote:No, that's not it at all. I'm talking about the standard 6" thick, 19" length, 16" wide carry-on roller. The size that's made to meet current requirements.pokinmik wrote:It seems airlines are slowly enforcing carry-on sizes back to normal levels. It really got out of control over the past decade with passengers bringing bigger and bigger bags onboard (noted - due to baggage fees I'm sure). Once again, everyone in the gen pop think they're so damn special they can bring an over-stuffed and oversized rolling suitcase onboard that they think the flight attendant will magically wedge into the overhead bin somehow, ruining it for everyone else in the future that is barely over the size restriction, as I'm guessing you were. It had to happen though. Humans abuse everything.Longhorned wrote:What is it with the carry-on luggage limitation on Lufthansa recently? I'm ready for them to make me take off my pants and check in those as well.