Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 2:44 pm
Not shitcanning Heeke for cause just points the spotlight on Prez Bobby even more.
It’s like a bribe at this point.
It’s like a bribe at this point.
Robbins has to go. He was either surrounded by corrupt incompetents that he chose and continues to pay or he was complicit. Either way, I’m sick and tired of our administration being a fucking punchline.
https://www.sportico.com/leagues/colleg ... 234651231/
Dunno about that.
He had a shitty boss
A modern version of "He was rather, um, unfortunate in his choice of ancestors.”
Every time I see “LARP” on think of a Reno 911 episode with Patton Oswald as some sort of wizard.CalStateTempe wrote: Thu Jan 25, 2024 8:03 pm So do we just fire him for no reason other to let Bobby LARP as trump for a few weeks?
Arizona finally stopped paying Kevin Sumlin his buyout money, and it didn't know what to do with itself, so Robbins decided to fire Heeke so they could continue to pay someone to not work at Arizona.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
Contract law.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
ChooChooCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:30 amArizona finally stopped paying Kevin Sumlin his buyout money, and it didn't know what to do with itself, so Robbins decided to fire Heeke so they could continue to pay someone to not work at Arizona.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
Firing for cause is in most employment contracts. If he mishandled funds or simply did not manage them that is part of his job. Deciding not to fire him for cause makes everyone including fans wonder WTF.pc in NM wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:45 amContract law.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
It would probably cost a lot more than a million in legal fees and other costs. Easier to just let him go.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:39 amFiring for cause is in most employment contracts. If he mishandled funds or simply did not manage them that is part of his job. Deciding not to fire him for cause makes everyone including fans wonder WTF.pc in NM wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:45 amContract law.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
ThisUAEebs86 wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:59 amIt would probably cost a lot more than a million in legal fees and other costs. Easier to just let him go.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:39 amFiring for cause is in most employment contracts. If he mishandled funds or simply did not manage them that is part of his job. Deciding not to fire him for cause makes everyone including fans wonder WTF.pc in NM wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:45 amContract law.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
Obviously. I/We haven't read the contract. Poor or unsatisfactory performance very likely wouldn't qualify as "for cause" - "Cause" typically requires valid, legally classified reasons, and these kind of contracts probably narrow what would qualify - plus, a court challenge would require depositions, etc. - that could be worth the avoiding in a situation like this...TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:39 amFiring for cause is in most employment contracts. If he mishandled funds or simply did not manage them that is part of his job. Deciding not to fire him for cause makes everyone including fans wonder WTF.pc in NM wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:45 amContract law.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
I don't think contract litigation is that expensive. You are basically stating what you determined to be the cause and whether it fit the contracts definition of "for cause". If anything Heeke would probably negotiate to avoid having his name attached to suing a former employer if he intends to work again.UAEebs86 wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:59 amIt would probably cost a lot more than a million in legal fees and other costs. Easier to just let him go.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:39 amFiring for cause is in most employment contracts. If he mishandled funds or simply did not manage them that is part of his job. Deciding not to fire him for cause makes everyone including fans wonder WTF.pc in NM wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:45 amContract law.TheCat wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:09 am Well that will give ABOR some pause. You have a financial crisis partly caused by your AD and you terminated him and now you are paying him through 2025? That sir is questionable decision making at best and covering your own tracks at worse. Time for Bobby to go.
I think ABOR will think the same and Bobby will be their fall guy.Postmaster wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:24 pm I don’t think there was cause. There was just a fall guy.
Because he has shown he lacks understanding of finances. He fired the AD to cover his own mistakes. He was too enamored with Crowe. His decisions have cost the school and AD money and prestige. He did nothing to get rid of Scott.
The ABOR ain’t what it used to be. Haha.Winger wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 12:32 pm Was at a table a couple months back with several Robbins acolytes and told them my understanding was that Robbins will be done when this contract terms (end of summer). They all skoffed, told me how many ABOR members he had “in his back pocket”, and one Arizona coach actually said to me “you need better sources”. It was all I could do to not tell that coach that I was the guy who broke that Livengood’s contract wasn’t being renewed. Lol.
Good day for Arizona athletics.
That’s what I meant by “ain’t what it used to be”.Alieberman wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:26 pm He did have ABOR in his pocket… don’t think there isn’t also going to be an ABOR shakeup as well
I heard through the summer but I also heard 2026. So not quite sure and this was essentially a useless post but that’s what I’m here for.
Evidently not. I can’t name the coach but I saw them again this afternoon and it was all I could do to not ask them how my sources look now lol.Postmaster wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 3:35 pmThe ABOR ain’t what it used to be. Haha.Winger wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 12:32 pm Was at a table a couple months back with several Robbins acolytes and told them my understanding was that Robbins will be done when this contract terms (end of summer). They all skoffed, told me how many ABOR members he had “in his back pocket”, and one Arizona coach actually said to me “you need better sources”. It was all I could do to not tell that coach that I was the guy who broke that Livengood’s contract wasn’t being renewed. Lol.
Good day for Arizona athletics.
I would pay for your extra grease at Greasy Tony’s if you tell me the name of the coach.
I can confirm the Governor turning on Robbins being the ultimate nail in his coffin. He was given a lot of free rein and could have led this university to heights we had not yet seen, but his ego starting writing checks his ass couldn’t cash (pretty much literally) and once the headlines turned bad it caught that office’s eye and no amount of firing his underlings was going to be good enough.Winger wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 6:44 pm Agree that once the Gov turned on him he was working up hill. Funny thing there is that it used to be said that Robbins was untouchable by the Gov because he was her COVID darling. Funny thing there is Robbins didn’t believe in anything he/they did on that front (allegedly, that is 2nd hand).
His contract is for another year+ but the search is onChicat wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:33 pmI heard through the summer but I also heard 2026. So not quite sure and this was essentially a useless post but that’s what I’m here for.
Some of my first and more serious disillusionment with the world we live in was when I became increasingly exposed to the actual operations and personalities in academic leadership (both admins and faculty, unfortunately) through my undergraduate and graduate (two universities) careers. My notions about correlations between knowledge and sound decision-making were repeatedly shattered.Winger wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:43 am Wanted to share something that I may have posted elsewhere here (if I have I apologize for the repeat).
There were several things about the end of this administration’s tenure that I never completely understood.
One of them was how Robbins could go MIA during the coaching search after his buddy Fisch screwed him (unofficial explanation was “covid”), allow Barnes/Heeke to hire Brennan, and then about a week later, the morning following a dinner with Heeke to celebrate the football players staying, fire him.
That to me is beyond unreal. A university President, under fire, who previously meddled in the A.D. to the point of ridiculousness, decides to not participate in the head football coaching search and hire, lets his athletic director see that to completion, and then fires him a week later.
One thing I wanted to share is that Heeke was completely blindsided. And I don’t know the exact term to describe how he felt but it was something like: betrayed, disbelief, and very unhappy or angry.
Fwiw it is difficult for me to believe that Robbins fired Heeke thinking that might save him. For one, the Govenor couldn’t care less about who Arizona’s AD is, and for a second the Arizona AD, Heeke, etc. is not even a drop in the bucket when it comes to the significance of the things that threatened Robbins’ job. For a third, there is zero chance Heeke spent what he did without Robbins encouragement and approval, and the department’s loan and defecit were not out of line when compared with like athletic departments across the country. Byrne threw the “balanced budget” nature of Arizona’s AD out the window long ago.
To me, a strange deal, and the last marker of why I always say that you don’t want a university President who “is too into sports” and a prime example of why I also say that you should never hire a M.D. to be a university president; and especially one with zero meaningful experience.
No, not yet and haven’t heard a word. She looks very good on paper imo.azcat49 wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:01 am Most importantly though Winger, have you interacted with the new AD and do you like what she brings to the department?