Re: Tommy Lloyd
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:40 am
I’ll always hate Heeke and Robbins for making me dread Damon freaking Stoudamire.
Look, we need someone who knows Arizona inside and out, is an aggressive recruiter, knows how to invest in players and has the right connections.
Damon isn't a top 4 coach in the WCC at this point. Few, Romar, Pope and Bennett at least ahead of him. Heck, Herb Sendek has been better at Santa Clara than Damon has been at Pacific.
As someone who grew up in Oregon, I can tell you Canzano is absolute trash. He's not Hansen levels but he's just bad. He's looked better of late by bashing the Pac12 but that's too easy.RondaeShimmy wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 9:09 amI see nothing on this anywhere, other than re-reporting Damon interviewed.
I only found this, guy from the Oregonian saying it should be Damon
Sounds like wishful thinking, not reporting its Damon. I hope it's not Damon.
Bring back Romar
YES!!
I'll refute that he played much better defense during the Elite 8 Run than he did during the regular season, and 10x better than Ayton did vs. Buffalo/zonagrad wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:45 amI list that as a negative for Miller. Kyryl was awful -- a guy you'd see on the end of the bench at Wazzu or in the Big Sky.RondaeShimmy wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:38 amHe raided Kyryl as a recruit, was committed to Xavier.TheCat wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:20 amI don't recall the players that Sean brought from Xavier? Who were they?gronk4heisman wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 9:03 amDid you have a problem when Sean Miller did it?TheCat wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 6:47 pm
Jesus....just what I want. A coach so loyal that he raids the program he just spent 20 years at. If he was contacted earlier and did not tell Arizona to stand down till the Natty was over I want no part of a person like that. Personally I don't believe any coach with any honor would do that to the program he was working for and I don't know llyod but will give him the benefit of the doubt on that one.
How about we all start putting bile in our coffee?Alieberman wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:24 pm How about an all Stoudamire staff?
HC- Damon
AHC- Salim
AC Amare
Wasn't there a Stoudamire that also played basketball at Oregon State in between Damon and Salim?Alieberman wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:24 pm How about an all Stoudamire staff?
HC- Damon
AHC- Salim
AC Amare
Prefer an all-Dame staff.Alieberman wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:24 pm How about an all Stoudamire staff?
HC- Damon
AHC- Salim
AC Amare
So, much better than Brett Brennan's winning % at SJST, but the argument for him was his trajectory, which Damon's is very similar to. Of course what we look for in a coach for our basketball program vs. football program should be totally different as they're light years apart in success, stature, expectations, etc. I don't want Damon as the new HC, but his trajectory hasn't been bad (at least until this year).Spaceman Spiff wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:52 amDamon has won 48% of his games. The guy before him, Ron Verlin, won .405%. Before Verlin, Bob Thomason won .575%.
I think it's fair to regard Damon as middle of the road for Pacific's standards.
I’d rather not have a coach who sucker punched a player the day after the players mother died...Basketcats wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:00 am What about Gregg Marshall? I mean...we are about to venture into a dark period for the program. He has some baggage I know, but what better place (and time) to prove yourself worthy of another HC position by fixing yourself while rebuilding a program?
One, the bolded is a big deal.mofo wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:57 pmSo, much better than Brett Brennan's winning % at SJST, but the argument for him was his trajectory, which Damon's is very similar to. Of course what we look for in a coach for our basketball program vs. football program should be totally different as they're light years apart in success, stature, expectations, etc. I don't want Damon as the new HC, but his trajectory hasn't been bad (at least until this year).Spaceman Spiff wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:52 amDamon has won 48% of his games. The guy before him, Ron Verlin, won .405%. Before Verlin, Bob Thomason won .575%.
I think it's fair to regard Damon as middle of the road for Pacific's standards.
Pacific is a challenge to coach at because of the disparity in facilities, resources, schools and even locations. You can't win a recruiting battle at Pacific no matter who you are. You just can't. Gonzaga, BYU, St. Mary's, Pepperdine, Santa Clara, etc... are all going to get better players than you every single time. It really is apples vs. oranges in that conference. There's a reason there is never any historical movement in the standings in that conference. The hierarchy is set in the WCC. You would have to be a super creative coach with some type of unique recruitment strategy to haul talent to Pacific.Spaceman Spiff wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:06 pmOne, the bolded is a big deal.mofo wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:57 pmSo, much better than Brett Brennan's winning % at SJST, but the argument for him was his trajectory, which Damon's is very similar to. Of course what we look for in a coach for our basketball program vs. football program should be totally different as they're light years apart in success, stature, expectations, etc. I don't want Damon as the new HC, but his trajectory hasn't been bad (at least until this year).Spaceman Spiff wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:52 amDamon has won 48% of his games. The guy before him, Ron Verlin, won .405%. Before Verlin, Bob Thomason won .575%.
I think it's fair to regard Damon as middle of the road for Pacific's standards.
Two, one of the negatives is Damon had his best, only winning season last year. He followed that being .500 overall and sub .500 in conference.
Third, I'm not hyped that Damon's best year, he wasn't sniffing the tourney. Maybe middle of the NIT, then he backslid this year.
I see Brennan very differently in that his trajectory moved faster and higher than Damon's in a better conference. I preferred Brennan to Fisch significantly, but I wouldn't call Brennan a sure thing either.
The big thing is expectations, though. Arizona is a top ten basketball job. Arizona is a bottom ten P5 football job. You should be fishing in two separate ponds.
Second? When was the first?
Beachcat97 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:20 am I’m convinced Lloyd can be a good hire. We need to see what his assistant staff looks like, and I really, really hope he follows Fisch’s lead and gets some Cats on that bench. Try to keep JET for sure. Imagine Lloyd and JET on the recruiting trail. That alone should get people excited.
Yep, they're having the "second" so they can make the announcement on Monday...EastCoastCat wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 4:47 amSecond? When was the first?
Ah yes, right after Heeke and Robbins announced support for CSM.
If Lloyd was to say no he wouldn’t be having a second interview. That means he’s the next Arizona coach.
I don’t think anyone doubts Lloyd can recruit but the bigger question is whether he can coach a team as the #1 guy.Beachcat97 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:20 am I’m convinced Lloyd can be a good hire. We need to see what his assistant staff looks like, and I really, really hope he follows Fisch’s lead and gets some Cats on that bench. Try to keep JET for sure. Imagine Lloyd and JET on the recruiting trail. That alone should get people excited.
We also don’t know how he’ll be with boosters, at alumni functions, or with the press. We don’t know how he’ll handle being the boss instead of a coworker of the assistants and support staff. We have no idea how he’ll function as the face of the program.EastCoastCat wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:32 amI don’t think anyone doubts Lloyd can recruit but the bigger question is whether he can coach a team as the #1 guy.Beachcat97 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:20 am I’m convinced Lloyd can be a good hire. We need to see what his assistant staff looks like, and I really, really hope he follows Fisch’s lead and gets some Cats on that bench. Try to keep JET for sure. Imagine Lloyd and JET on the recruiting trail. That alone should get people excited.
Can he do the X’s and O’s? Can he motivate players? What style of play will we see, Gonzaga’s? Can he get players to be all in on D? How will he approach a tough conference schedule which he has never faced in 17 years? Will he embrace the Proud Tradition & A Players Program like CSM or is that not his thing?
Those are the questions we can’t really answer now because they are unknowns as he’s been an assistant his whole career.
I went back and watched Gonzaga final four games once I heard Lloyd was the lead candidate because I thought I saw a Gonzaga assistant drawing up a play during a timeout and I instantly thought to myself...Few sure trusts his assistants. I couldn’t find the exact memory I have engraved in my brain. However, Lloyd was over Fews shoulder in multiple times helping diagram plays when Gonzaga’s sideline was shown.HiCat wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:27 amBeachcat97 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:20 am I’m convinced Lloyd can be a good hire. We need to see what his assistant staff looks like, and I really, really hope he follows Fisch’s lead and gets some Cats on that bench. Try to keep JET for sure. Imagine Lloyd and JET on the recruiting trail. That alone should get people excited.
Is he a good game coach? Love that he can recruit internationally, but does he have what it takes come game time?
Chi, these are all good points. As someone who has been a lot of hiring committees, I can say that sometimes a person's body of work merits the opportunity. It doesn't always work out, but sometimes it does. I can't see the future with Lloyd, but I do feel comfortable giving him this shot. I may be in the minority.Chicat wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:51 amWe also don’t know how he’ll be with boosters, at alumni functions, or with the press. We don’t know how he’ll handle being the boss instead of a coworker of the assistants and support staff. We have no idea how he’ll function as the face of the program.EastCoastCat wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:32 amI don’t think anyone doubts Lloyd can recruit but the bigger question is whether he can coach a team as the #1 guy.Beachcat97 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:20 am I’m convinced Lloyd can be a good hire. We need to see what his assistant staff looks like, and I really, really hope he follows Fisch’s lead and gets some Cats on that bench. Try to keep JET for sure. Imagine Lloyd and JET on the recruiting trail. That alone should get people excited.
Can he do the X’s and O’s? Can he motivate players? What style of play will we see, Gonzaga’s? Can he get players to be all in on D? How will he approach a tough conference schedule which he has never faced in 17 years? Will he embrace the Proud Tradition & A Players Program like CSM or is that not his thing?
Those are the questions we can’t really answer now because they are unknowns as he’s been an assistant his whole career.
You can observe all these things when you’re looking at people who already run their own program, and you can weigh their pros and cons. We knew with CSM that he could be prickly with the press but that his assistants and players loved him and that he was good with boosters, alumni, & students. It was that stuff AND the results on the court that made him a good candidate for a job like Arizona.
I can vouch for this part. I have connections to Gonzaga and have been at events with him. He's charismatic in those settings and get's alums and boosters FIRED UP.Chicat wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:51 am
We also don’t know how he’ll be with boosters, at alumni functions, or with the press. We don’t know how he’ll handle being the boss instead of a coworker of the assistants and support staff. We have no idea how he’ll function as the face of the program.
You can observe all these things when you’re looking at people who already run their own program, and you can weigh their pros and cons. We knew with CSM that he could be prickly with the press but that his assistants and players loved him and that he was good with boosters, alumni, & students. It was that stuff AND the results on the court that made him a good candidate for a job like Arizona.
I’m not sure what this has to do with the conversation as I haven’t seen too many coaches not wearing masks but OK.CatFanOneMil wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:26 am The fact that he wears a mask is a plus...I would have never guessed at this point in life that people who follow basic science and common sense would be considered "exceptions to the rule" but here we are.
I recall seeing that guy on sidelines, at first I thought Few had tripled in size.Frybry02 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 8:11 amI went back and watched Gonzaga final four games once I heard Lloyd was the lead candidate because I thought I saw a Gonzaga assistant drawing up a play during a timeout and I instantly thought to myself...Few sure trusts his assistants. I couldn’t find the exact memory I have engraved in my brain. However, Lloyd was over Fews shoulder in multiple times helping diagram plays when Gonzaga’s sideline was shown.HiCat wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:27 amBeachcat97 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:20 am I’m convinced Lloyd can be a good hire. We need to see what his assistant staff looks like, and I really, really hope he follows Fisch’s lead and gets some Cats on that bench. Try to keep JET for sure. Imagine Lloyd and JET on the recruiting trail. That alone should get people excited.
Is he a good game coach? Love that he can recruit internationally, but does he have what it takes come game time?
Also, during the 2nd half and overtime of the UCLA game, it looked like Gonzaga had 2 head coaches on the sideline. Lloyd was pacing the sidelines more than few was. I am a little surprised Lloyd didn’t get a little warning from the refs. He was half way down the scorers table a few times lol.
Well, I'm sold. I really hope this gets announced soon.Dave wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:54 am I have been doing a lot of thinking and researching over the past couple of days and have concluded that I would be 100% behind the hiring of Tommy Lloyd.
Here is a must watch interview that will really get you excited about him as a person and coach. You have to watch the part he talks about offensive sets. It starts at the 26 minute mark.
https://youtu.be/Zhs3zVJOQPM
So crazy as I was listening to this yesterday and that's the exact part of the interview that I was coming in to share.Beachcat97 wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 10:22 amWell, I'm sold. I really hope this gets announced soon.Dave wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:54 am I have been doing a lot of thinking and researching over the past couple of days and have concluded that I would be 100% behind the hiring of Tommy Lloyd.
Here is a must watch interview that will really get you excited about him as a person and coach. You have to watch the part he talks about offensive sets. It starts at the 26 minute mark.
https://youtu.be/Zhs3zVJOQPM
On Gonzaga's playing style:You know I think once I started to get exposed to things in Europe I started to see the game a different way and I chose to really pursue that. Spend time watching it...and learning it and trying to implement some of those things at Gonzaga. And I can really see the last 8 to 5 years the US game has definitely trended and been more influenced by what's happened in Europe with the ball screen spacing and movement stuff and reads.
One of the things we really try to emphasize with our guys is how we move on offense. How we move and how we react to each other and having a basic understanding of what we want to do in certain spacing scenarios. The beauty of our system and you know a lot of it is Coach Few is I think we get more enjoyment out of our players creating a good play on their own from the concepts we play rather than us calling a perfect set.
To me that's one of the biggest things that when I watch teams play that there's this control factor that a lot of American coaches want on the game that sometimes I think in the end it almost ends up inhibiting their team and their players aren't able to make adjustments ... make reads to free flow and to play with this conceptual understanding.
And I know I mean that's what we really try to hammer on is just how to play not run plays. We spend a bunch of time with it ... it takes alot .. and yeah you are prone to make mistakes but I think what it also does it it opens up an element of creativity that makes it fun to play in ... and hard to play against.
It's also a type of signaling. You aren't seeing "We're interviewing Lloyd and Musselman."Merkin wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 10:56 am After reading the UA was interviewing JeT, Miles and Damon, Lloyd doesn't seem so bad after all.
But then again, outside of the courtesy interview, announcing such poor candidates was probably intentionally so we all come to that conclusion.
Oooh, that's pretty cynical, Merk, and I'm as cynical as they come. I think Damon's interview is fine. He's already a head coach, and he's trending upward. JET and Miles are legacy interviews, imo. Pastner would be the same, though even he has had two head coaching jobs at decent programs.Merkin wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 10:56 am After reading the UA was interviewing JeT, Miles and Damon, Lloyd doesn't seem so bad after all.
But then again, outside of the courtesy interview, announcing such poor candidates was probably intentionally so we all come to that conclusion.