Re: Bribery Scandal - FBI Probe - Book Richardson Involved
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:39 pm
The only thing more outrageous here is Jason's battery.UAEebs86 wrote:

A co-op community for Arizona Fans
http://beardownwildcats.com/
The only thing more outrageous here is Jason's battery.UAEebs86 wrote:
Chicat wrote:Oh my god, the courage to screenshot something at 1% battery is something magnificent to behold.
Schlabach probably plugs in at 83%.
PS - Scheer is doing work.
Same. XXL and tell me where to send the $goslingswagg wrote:Jefe - I will absolutely do a dri-fit version of that shirt.
This is hilarious, and I kid you not, my phone is at 83% and I'm about to plug it in.Chicat wrote:Oh my god, the courage to screenshot something at 1% battery is something magnificent to behold.
Schlabach probably plugs in at 83%.
PS - Scheer is doing work.
What do you think he's trying to derail?Beachcat97 wrote:I wonder if Penis Vitale knows we have the #2 recruiting class in the country for next year.
Yeah Duke, North Carolina, Kansas, ...... all want our recruits. ESPN to the rescue.Spaceman Spiff wrote:What do you think he's trying to derail?Beachcat97 wrote:I wonder if Penis Vitale knows we have the #2 recruiting class in the country for next year.
Damn. If that's true, I'm actually surprised the university isn't pushing back more on this smear campaign.Spaceman Spiff wrote:What do you think he's trying to derail?Beachcat97 wrote:I wonder if Penis Vitale knows we have the #2 recruiting class in the country for next year.
Duke "vetted" him, well, there you have it, nothing left to see or question. Time to move on.Gilbertcat wrote:http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... lways-show
67 "Paragraphs", 4 of them briefly mention his FBI issues but they are quick to point out that Duke fully vetted him and he is good to go, nothing to see.....................
What a great fluff piece on why Zion is so good. This is the part that bothers me so much. We get killed, some of it is warranted since we are involved, while others don't even get mentioned or if they do, it is a passing line in an article about how great they are. I'm just ready for this cloud to be gone, but I guess we have to wait until after Book's trial and then possibly NCAA stuff.midnightx wrote:Duke "vetted" him, well, there you have it, nothing left to see or question. Time to move on.Gilbertcat wrote:http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... lways-show
67 "Paragraphs", 4 of them briefly mention his FBI issues but they are quick to point out that Duke fully vetted him and he is good to go, nothing to see.....................
Message sent!PennZona20 wrote:Same. XXL and tell me where to send the $
phxcat23 wrote:Hopefully the special meeting was to look at how to sue the shit out of ESPN.
That. . . and trying to hide the fact they are a Duke (NC, Kansas, other non-west coast U) recruiting agency. Pay no attention to the rat behind the curtain!Chicat wrote:They love the clicks.
I think we all know that if Schlabach got a tip that Coach K was on FBI wiretap talking about $100k for Justise Winslow, there’s no way that article in its original form would have ever seen the light of day.ghostwhitehorse wrote:That. . . and trying to hide the fact they are a Duke (NC, Kansas, other non-west coast U) recruiting agency. Pay no attention to the rat behind the curtain!Chicat wrote:They love the clicks.
It was vetted.Chicat wrote:I think we all know that if Schlabach got a tip that Coach K was on FBI wiretap talking about $100k for Justise Winslow, there’s no way that article in its original form would have ever seen the light of day.ghostwhitehorse wrote:That. . . and trying to hide the fact they are a Duke (NC, Kansas, other non-west coast U) recruiting agency. Pay no attention to the rat behind the curtain!Chicat wrote:They love the clicks.
Why is there one board of regents for three universities? I'm used to the president presiding over all the campuses of a single university, and answering to one board. Not even New Mexico has one board of regents for UNM, NM State, etc. Each has its own.Newportcat wrote:In case anyone didn’t know the way we have the regent system for our university is fucking beyond awful
We should have a board of trustees specific to our university that oversees the president
You are looking in all the wrong places because Insee it all the timergdeuce wrote:Why is no one asking why ESPN continues its all-out assault on CSM/Arizona?
UAEebs86 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I bet he will later say that this only applies to those in the "Championship Series" or whatever it is call. I bet he can't resist and says something about Arizona before tomorrow night's tipoff at McKale.UAEebs86 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's not uncommon - 25 states have some form of a consolidated governing board for public universities.Longhorned wrote:Why is there one board of regents for three universities? I'm used to the president presiding over all the campuses of a single university, and answering to one board. Not even New Mexico has one board of regents for UNM, NM State, etc. Each has its own.Newportcat wrote:In case anyone didn’t know the way we have the regent system for our university is fucking beyond awful
We should have a board of trustees specific to our university that oversees the president
I guess we're just in the lucky half.Sidewinder wrote:It's not uncommon - 25 states have some form of a consolidated governing board for public universities.Longhorned wrote:Why is there one board of regents for three universities? I'm used to the president presiding over all the campuses of a single university, and answering to one board. Not even New Mexico has one board of regents for UNM, NM State, etc. Each has its own.Newportcat wrote:In case anyone didn’t know the way we have the regent system for our university is fucking beyond awful
We should have a board of trustees specific to our university that oversees the president
Im putting the order in but didn't hear back from you and it doesn't look like you saw my message. Emailed you, lmk!PennZona20 wrote:Same. XXL and tell me where to send the $goslingswagg wrote:Jefe - I will absolutely do a dri-fit version of that shirt.
That article should be directed at Enfuego specifically.sirhamsalot wrote:Yahoo going hard at Kansas and the NCAA...![]()
https://sports.yahoo.com/bill-self-post ... 11367.html" target="_blank
"He [Gassnola] has the same attorney as the Mafia hit man currently suspected of murdering former Boston crime boss Whitey Bulger in a federal prison last week."sirhamsalot wrote:Yahoo going hard at Kansas and the NCAA...![]()
https://sports.yahoo.com/bill-self-post ... 11367.html" target="_blank
Predictably, the only responses to his tweet of the article are from Arizona fans (including some of our own BDW). Scheer also tweeted at him but none of these national guys ever respond. Maybe Scheer can text him and then post the conversationChooChooCat wrote:Hey did you guys know that Allonzo Trier was also somehow involved in all of this? Regardless of the fact his name has never once come up in any allegations or in testimony whatsoever? Well fuck me, the media as a whole are doing a fantastic job of misrepresenting facts and just blatantly making shit up as they go along. This is getting old. REAL. FUCKING. FAST.
https://sports.yahoo.com/despite-scanda ... 36235.html" target="_blank
https://sports.yahoo.com/despite-scanda ... 36235.html" target="_blank(Editor’s note: A previous version of this story mentioned Allonzo Trier as having been named in federal testimony. He was not. The story has been updated to reflect that.)
The article still is factually incorrect regardless if they took out the most factually incorrect portion or not.PHXCATS wrote:Forde removed Trier's name from his article
Exactly as many have pointed out on twitterChooChooCat wrote:The article still is factually incorrect regardless if they took out the most factually incorrect portion or not.PHXCATS wrote:Forde removed Trier's name from his article
Fortunately nobody cares besides Arizona fans, and likely also the only ones who saw it, read it and the majority who gave the article trafficGilbertcat wrote:https://sports.yahoo.com/despite-scanda ... 36235.html" target="_blank(Editor’s note: A previous version of this story mentioned Allonzo Trier as having been named in federal testimony. He was not. The story has been updated to reflect that.)
See ESPN, thats how you do a correction, not inducing more ramblings that still dont prove the lies.
Rawle, at most, is involved in the email proposing paying him. Saying Gassnola testified he paid regarding Ayton is fair, but it's a big omission that the testimony was that the payment was for KU and not to Ayton or family.ChooChooCat wrote:The article still is factually incorrect regardless if they took out the most factually incorrect portion or not.PHXCATS wrote:Forde removed Trier's name from his article