Official Bracketology Thread

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns

User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 44902
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Merkin »

Pretty sure the WVU governor has other things to worry about that are more important.

https://bsky.app/profile/brandonmarcell ... ljvvia4s2k


Brandon Marcello
‪@brandonmarcello.com‬

The governor of West Virginia is upset that West Virginia was left out of the NCAA Tournament. Might we see yet another lawsuit against the NCAA?


Image
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 48119
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Chicat »

EastCoastCat wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:03 pm
Chicat wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 8:34 am I like it that the UNC AD was like “Oh, I stepped out of the room when they debated the Tar Heels”.

As if the other committee members are toddlers with no sense of object permanence and they all just completely forgot their boss even existed as soon as the door closed.

It was an ACC snow job. The conference was dog shit yet somehow a team that no one had in made it based on their strength of schedule where they lost to every good team they played. Utter bullshit.
Object permanence...

Image
I’m a smart mothafucka
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
User avatar
dirtbags
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 4:58 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by dirtbags »

Merkin wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:14 pm Pretty sure the WVU governor has other things to worry about that are more important.

https://bsky.app/profile/brandonmarcell ... ljvvia4s2k


Brandon Marcello
‪@brandonmarcello.com‬

The governor of West Virginia is upset that West Virginia was left out of the NCAA Tournament. Might we see yet another lawsuit against the NCAA?


Image
yeah, this is kind of bananas. i'm sure WV could use the revenue units and exposure from the tournament, and multitasking is a thing, but the optics is not good. it'd be easy even for his constituents to think he's got his priorities wrong.

Image
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 44902
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Merkin »

Saw a post where someone suggested they take the schools out of the selecting, and let the professionals like KenPom, Lunardi and 10 others do it.

Image

Image
User avatar
U.P. Zona Fan
Posts: 2757
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:57 pm
Location: Big bay, MI

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by U.P. Zona Fan »

Yeah, u of m got hosed big time! Not only did they get underseeded, they get to play the best 12 seed ever in the history of 12 seeds.
Arizona State might have the most surprisingly anemic history in men's basketball of any program that you might think is better than it is.
-Norlander.
azcat49
Posts: 11664
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Gilbert Az

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by azcat49 »

Let Vegas pick the 37 at large and seed them. They know best. At least have someone from Vegas on the committee (I know that would look bad).

Some of those seeds are moved one line to accommodate travel and sites. It’s imperfect for sure
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
User avatar
EastCoastCat
Posts: 6780
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:25 am

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by EastCoastCat »

U.P. Zona Fan wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:24 pm Yeah, u of m got hosed big time! Not only did they get underseeded, they get to play the best 12 seed ever in the history of 12 seeds.
‘02 Missouri Tigers and ‘21 Oregon State Beavers might disagree.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 44902
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Merkin »

Just a banner few days for the NCAA.

Image
User avatar
U.P. Zona Fan
Posts: 2757
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:57 pm
Location: Big bay, MI

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by U.P. Zona Fan »

UCSD is #36 at kenpom
After getting to the final 4, Oregon st. was 43
After the tourney, Missouri was 29. Not sure what they were at the beginning of the tournament.
So, you might be right. At least about Mizzou.
Arizona State might have the most surprisingly anemic history in men's basketball of any program that you might think is better than it is.
-Norlander.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 44902
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Merkin »

Oregon will be tough. Hoping for Bama in this round.

Image
User avatar
UAEebs86
Posts: 30677
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by UAEebs86 »

Cheerleaders - Edge to Oregon

Student Body - UofA
TheCat
Posts: 3988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by TheCat »

Since this is the bracketology thread does anyone know the date/time/channel that Xavier plays Texas.

Nevermind I googled it.

NCAA Tournament First Four: When is the Xavier-Texas matchup?
Date: Wednesday, March 19
Time: 9:10 p.m. E.T.
Where: UD Arena
TV: TruTV
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 44902
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Merkin »

:D

Image
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 27350
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by azgreg »

That's perfect.
User avatar
84Cat
Posts: 20892
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:17 pm
Location: Boise

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by 84Cat »

:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 17964
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by dovecanyoncat »

Jimmer has us losing to Akron. Well, it's over now. I guess we needn't play at all.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
Postmaster
Posts: 3916
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Postmaster »

I still don't comprehend how the some play-in games are 11 seeds and some are 16.
AzCatFan2
Posts: 1434
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:45 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by AzCatFan2 »

Postmaster wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 7:11 pm I still don't comprehend how the some play-in games are 11 seeds and some are 16.
The last 4 auto qualifiers are the teams that play the two games against teams seeded at 16. The last four ar-large teams are the ones that usually play as 11 seeds. Occasionally, they might be 12 seeds, but that depends on where the last at large teams land. The last at large teams usually go to 11.
Postmaster
Posts: 3916
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Postmaster »

But if they are auto qualifiers, why do they have to play in round zero?
Did they add more conferences as auto qualifiers when they started this round zero thing?
Postmaster
Posts: 3916
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Postmaster »

And how do they decide which conferences have to play in this round?

How did Tony Padilla get selected to ref?
Postmaster
Posts: 3916
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Postmaster »

And why doesn't Canada just let them dig up Oak Island and really see what is underground?

Sorry, I got bored with the UNC/SDST game.
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 17964
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by dovecanyoncat »

Postmaster wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 8:10 pm And why doesn't Canada just let them dig up Oak Island and really see what is underground?
+3 rep
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 48119
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Chicat »

The 16’s getting a game means two of their conferences get an NCAA tournament win which means $2M each which they then disburse to all their schools. It’s a good way to get small conferences some tourney revenue.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Postmaster
Posts: 3916
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Postmaster »

UAEebs86 wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:38 pm Cheerleaders - Edge to Oregon

Student Body - UofA
Sweaters
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 27350
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by azgreg »

Postmaster wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 8:02 pm But if they are auto qualifiers, why do they have to play in round zero?
Did they add more conferences as auto qualifiers when they started this round zero thing?
It's bullshit. The play in games should be the last eight at large teams.
AzCatFan2
Posts: 1434
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:45 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by AzCatFan2 »

I think 64 was perfect. Who cares if it means less at large.
User avatar
Bangkok Wildcat
Posts: 2965
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:44 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Bangkok Wildcat »

AzCatFan2 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 10:32 pm I think 64 was perfect. Who cares if it means less at large.
This X 1000%
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 27350
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by azgreg »

AzCatFan2 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 10:32 pm I think 64 was perfect. Who cares if it means less at large.
Agree. If you're going to add teams it needs to be enough to justify another weekend. Make the tournament 256 teams.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 44902
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Merkin »

Bangkok Wildcat wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:19 am
AzCatFan2 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 10:32 pm I think 64 was perfect. Who cares if it means less at large.
This X 1000%
I would actually prefer they go back to 48 like it was for years. No seed lower than 11 has ever made the Final Four, and the lowest seed to win it all was an 8.
AzCatFan2
Posts: 1434
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:45 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by AzCatFan2 »

Merkin wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:23 am
Bangkok Wildcat wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:19 am
AzCatFan2 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 10:32 pm I think 64 was perfect. Who cares if it means less at large.
This X 1000%
I would actually prefer they go back to 48 like it was for years. No seed lower than 11 has ever made the Final Four, and the lowest seed to win it all was an 8.
Based off the Final Four and Champions, this is a valid argument. Especially if the point of the tournament is to crown a champion, and nothing else. But I'd argue part of the allure and reason for the tournament is the double digit seed upsets, and teams like Florida Gulf Coast making it to the Sweet 16. The chance of FGCU ever winning it all is infinitesimal, but the chance of them winning two is large enough that it happens from time to time. And that's as big a story in many regards as who wins it all.
azcat49
Posts: 11664
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Gilbert Az

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by azcat49 »

#keepCinderella
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
User avatar
Alieberman
Posts: 14311
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
Location: I can't find my pants

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by Alieberman »

64 is perfect... but they aren't going to contract from the current 68. But please... DO NOT EXPAND!!!!!
TheCat
Posts: 3988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by TheCat »

I think this expansion was created to give small schools outside the big conferences a chance to be included. What it did is give even more big conference teams a chance to lobby to be included.
User avatar
dirtbags
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 4:58 pm

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by dirtbags »

AzCatFan2 wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:51 am
Merkin wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 7:23 am
Bangkok Wildcat wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:19 am
AzCatFan2 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 10:32 pm I think 64 was perfect. Who cares if it means less at large.
This X 1000%
I would actually prefer they go back to 48 like it was for years. No seed lower than 11 has ever made the Final Four, and the lowest seed to win it all was an 8.
Based off the Final Four and Champions, this is a valid argument. Especially if the point of the tournament is to crown a champion, and nothing else. But I'd argue part of the allure and reason for the tournament is the double digit seed upsets, and teams like Florida Gulf Coast making it to the Sweet 16. The chance of FGCU ever winning it all is infinitesimal, but the chance of them winning two is large enough that it happens from time to time. And that's as big a story in many regards as who wins it all.
i'm fine with 64/68 - it's nice for smaller programs to get exposure and a little revenue. big12 commissioner wants to expand the tournament to 76, though. that seems like a bit much. the preseason / season already feels so long, and it all runs right through to the postseason with no break, which seems like a grind for the players.
azcat49
Posts: 11664
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:33 pm
Location: Gilbert Az

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by azcat49 »

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/n ... 520443007/

This is how Ai see’s it. Just don’t see Kansas winning it all like it does LOL
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
User avatar
UAEebs86
Posts: 30677
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by UAEebs86 »

azcat49 wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:44 pm https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/n ... 520443007/

This is how Ai see’s it. Just don’t see Kansas winning it all like it does LOL
That's called an enfuego hallucination.
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 17964
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: Official Bracketology Thread

Post by dovecanyoncat »

UAEebs86 wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 4:06 pm
azcat49 wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:44 pm https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/n ... 520443007/

This is how Ai see’s it. Just don’t see Kansas winning it all like it does LOL
That's called an enfuego hallucination.
He's been busy lately, exfoliating his scrotum.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
Post Reply