Re: Caitlin Clark
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2024 7:13 pm
It was on ABC, and ESPN3
It was on ABC, and ESPN3
The problem is the WNBA doesn't make money like the NBA. There isn't even close to as much demand. Although Caitlin Clark may help change that. If you want the women to make more, they will need to be subsidized right now.Merkin wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:18 am I see even Biden is getting involved with her WNBA salary. And like I keep saying, that's just peanuts compared to her endorsement deals.
The Las Vegas Aces have sold out their entire upcoming season already. They play in an arena that seats about 8000 at Mandalay Bay. Some of their games have already been moved to T-Mobile Arena that seats about 18k. Would be cool if they sell out too.Catintheheat wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:32 amThe problem is the WNBA doesn't make money like the NBA. There isn't even close to as much demand. Although Caitlin Clark may help change that. If you want the women to make more, they will need to be subsidized right now.Merkin wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:18 am I see even Biden is getting involved with her WNBA salary. And like I keep saying, that's just peanuts compared to her endorsement deals.
Unless her teammates decide to "enforce" some fairplay for her, she's gonna get hurt, and the entire league will suffer her absence...
It’s not like a WNBA exec can run out onto the court to do something. That’s on her so-called teammates. The GM needs to get some players who are going to act like an actual team.Alieberman wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 11:30 am It does seem remarkable that the WNBA is not protecting their meal ticket
The coach needs to challenge her players, not complain publicly to the league...Chicat wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 11:36 amIt’s not like a WNBA exec can run out onto the court to do something. That’s on her so-called teammates. The GM needs to get some players who are going to act like an actual team.Alieberman wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 11:30 am It does seem remarkable that the WNBA is not protecting their meal ticket
I'm not saying she should get the Jordan / LeBron treatment from the refs as a rookie... but the WNBA could certainly have some talks with the heads of officiating saying they better keep an eye out for players taking cheap shots on the best thing that's ever happened to the WNBAChicat wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 11:36 amIt’s not like a WNBA exec can run out onto the court to do something. That’s on her so-called teammates. The GM needs to get some players who are going to act like an actual team.Alieberman wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 11:30 am It does seem remarkable that the WNBA is not protecting their meal ticket
What does that even mean? She can go back in time and shoot an extra free throw?
Matt Barnes posted a great vid this weekend about how Clark's teammates haven't had her back, like at all, when these opposing players are beating the shit out of her. Not even their coach has done very much. I can only imagine how demoralizing that must be for CC. She's tough, though. I'm not worried about her finding her stride and starting to roll. But her teammates really need to step tf up.Merkin wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 12:59 pmWhat does that even mean? She can go back in time and shoot an extra free throw?
The WNBA need to get the refs to make better decisions during the game. That was definitely not an "off the ball" foul.
Can't think of a player hated more by the other teams, their own team, and the refs.
Did the Reds hate Pete Rose?
Beachcat97 wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 1:02 pmMatt Barnes posted a great vid this weekend about how Clark's teammates haven't had her back, like at all, when these opposing players are beating the shit out of her. Not even their coach has done very much. I can only imagine how demoralizing that must be for CC. She's tough, though. I'm not worried about her finding her stride and starting to roll. But her teammates really need to step tf up.Merkin wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 12:59 pmWhat does that even mean? She can go back in time and shoot an extra free throw?
The WNBA need to get the refs to make better decisions during the game. That was definitely not an "off the ball" foul.
Can't think of a player hated more by the other teams, their own team, and the refs.
Did the Reds hate Pete Rose?
I have no native understanding of team, but I am deeply, intimately steeped in crew. If your crew won't back you up in a bar fight it means you have transgressed some important part of the tribal law, or you have shunned some profound part of pre-existing tribal tribute, and the tribe is willing to let outside context be the hand of discipline. CC is a transcendent player who has to manage logistics rather than strategy. If she doesn't see the difference she won't appreciate the fact that she can put the ball in the hole and still lose the larger battle.Beachcat97 wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 1:02 pmMatt Barnes posted a great vid this weekend about how Clark's teammates haven't had her back, like at all, when these opposing players are beating the shit out of her. Not even their coach has done very much. I can only imagine how demoralizing that must be for CC. She's tough, though. I'm not worried about her finding her stride and starting to roll. But her teammates really need to step tf up.Merkin wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 12:59 pmWhat does that even mean? She can go back in time and shoot an extra free throw?
The WNBA need to get the refs to make better decisions during the game. That was definitely not an "off the ball" foul.
Can't think of a player hated more by the other teams, their own team, and the refs.
Did the Reds hate Pete Rose?
gronk4heisman wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2024 11:42 am The girl who made the cheap shot is someone anyone who doesn't follow the WNBA would have no clue who she was. It was a chance to make her name.
For those who do follow the WNBA, you would know Chennedy is a lose cannon who after averaging more points in her rookie season than Catilin is averaging now was kicked off her team the following year then suspended by her next team and then out of the league for a year before the Sky picked her up this season.
Women generally have a problem celebrating accomplished women that partake in the same field as them.CalStateTempe wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:36 pm We have a serious problem with celebrating accomplished women in this country
Spoken like a typical male observerChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 6:41 amWomen generally have a problem celebrating accomplished women that partake in the same field as them.CalStateTempe wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:36 pm We have a serious problem with celebrating accomplished women in this country
You don't have to be a woman to know women, but durrrrr ok. That was literally just my own wife's words coming through my fingers.pc in NM wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:05 amSpoken like a typical male observerChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 6:41 amWomen generally have a problem celebrating accomplished women that partake in the same field as them.CalStateTempe wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:36 pm We have a serious problem with celebrating accomplished women in this country![]()
![]()
...
Heh heh heh, I concur, but with a twist: my observations are strictly informed by my wife's deliveries on the matter. But when I recapitulate hers I never come away wholly unscathed. Funny that.ChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:23 amYou don't have to be a woman to know women, but durrrrr ok. That was literally just my own wife's words coming through my fingers.pc in NM wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:05 amSpoken like a typical male observerChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 6:41 amWomen generally have a problem celebrating accomplished women that partake in the same field as them.CalStateTempe wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:36 pm We have a serious problem with celebrating accomplished women in this country![]()
![]()
...
Hahaha I guess I should've expected nothing less by using my wife's words.dovecanyoncat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:35 amHeh heh heh, I concur, but with a twist: my observations are strictly informed by my wife's deliveries on the matter. But when I recapitulate hers I never come away wholly unscathed. Funny that.ChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:23 amYou don't have to be a woman to know women, but durrrrr ok. That was literally just my own wife's words coming through my fingers.pc in NM wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:05 amSpoken like a typical male observerChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 6:41 amWomen generally have a problem celebrating accomplished women that partake in the same field as them.CalStateTempe wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:36 pm We have a serious problem with celebrating accomplished women in this country![]()
![]()
...
As light-hearted as my rejoinder was, I'm shocked by the defenses!! "Shocked", I tell you!!!ChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:37 amHahaha I guess I should've expected nothing less by using my wife's words.dovecanyoncat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:35 amHeh heh heh, I concur, but with a twist: my observations are strictly informed by my wife's deliveries on the matter. But when I recapitulate hers I never come away wholly unscathed. Funny that.ChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:23 amYou don't have to be a woman to know women, but durrrrr ok. That was literally just my own wife's words coming through my fingers.pc in NM wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:05 amSpoken like a typical male observerChooChooCat wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 6:41 am
Women generally have a problem celebrating accomplished women that partake in the same field as them.![]()
![]()
...