Bear Down Wildcats

catgrad97 wrote:Wilborn limping off. Get those starters the hell off the field.

Now Jarius Wallace. For the SECOND time.

Fresh legs out there in the secondary, pronto!

prh wrote:Anyone notice the graphic that said we were 2-3 in our first 4 games? Pac12 is so awful at everything

For real. The players are supposed to be the amateurs, guys.

one thing the D can point to when they watch the tape for improvements...missed tackles.

BALL GAME!!!!

TatetheGreat wrote:

prh wrote:Anyone notice the graphic that said we were 2-3 in our first 4 games? Pac12 is so awful at everything

For real. The players are supposed to be the amateurs, guys.

Hey, you can't blame our independent contractor officials for confusing us for Arizona State.

I'll take it!!!

58-37 what a win!

Happy! Happy! Smile! Smile!

58 - 37 'Cats final. WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bear The Fuck Down!!!!!!!

4-0 in Tate conference games

Pretty, pretty, pretty good

GG guys, who would've thought the season would be like this after the Utah game? Hey look, we are bowl eligible now!

And they updated the record to WSU 8-1, UA 5-3 on the header.

SCCats wrote:4-0 in Tate conference games

Pretty, pretty, pretty good

It’s also the only 4 games I’ve gotten to see......Bangkok good luck or happy ending? Lol

SCCats wrote:4-0 in Tate conference games

Pretty, pretty, pretty good

Cats are actually getting better with every game, on every unit. Measurably.

NOBODY would have thought next week's Arizona-USC game would be for the Pac-12 South title. Least of all, me.

Yet here it comes.

catgrad97 wrote:

SCCats wrote:4-0 in Tate conference games

Pretty, pretty, pretty good

Cats are actually getting better with every game, on every unit. Measurably.

NOBODY would have thought next week's Arizona-USC game would be for the Pac-12 South title. Least of all, me.

Yet here it comes.

Exactly, we’ll said catgrad

I'll take it. Happy to see the offense doing so well. Defense will always still need a lot of work

3 words:

Fire Rich Rod

Not often you can give up 602 passing yards and win, but that shows how good Tate is playing

Alieberman wrote:3 words:

Fire Rich Rod

I'm still definitely not against it

azcat49 wrote:69-7, its payback time. Cats find a way to erase that embarrassment..

Tate cements the star he is and the talk accelerates. Runs for 125 and throws for 250 today

I don't know what he had but it had to be close to these numbers. They can't stop him. No one can stop him. Damn it feels good. We will win out and I mean win out. PAC champions

ASUHATER! wrote:I'll take it. Happy to see the offense doing so well. Defense will always still need a lot of work

4 of 18 on 3rd down conversions. 4 interceptions. Our D played lights out. Just need to get more pressure on the QB. Keep talking out of your ass.

ASUHATER! wrote:

Alieberman wrote:3 words:

Fire Rich Rod

I'm still definitely not against it

I don't doubt that at all.

azcat49 wrote:

azcat49 wrote:69-7, its payback time. Cats find a way to erase that embarrassment..

Tate cements the star he is and the talk accelerates. Runs for 125 and throws for 250 today

I don't know what he had but it had to be close to these numbers. They can't stop him. No one can stop him. Damn it feels good. We will win out and I mean win out. PAC champions

Yeah, but Pac-12 Network still has Bryce Love as offensive player of the year ahead of Khalil Tate, so what do we know?

Bangkok Wildcat wrote:

SCCats wrote:4-0 in Tate conference games

Pretty, pretty, pretty good

It’s also the only 4 games I’ve gotten to see......Bangkok good luck or happy ending? Lol

I don't know how many times we've won 4 conference games in a row, but it can't be that many. 1998 for sure. Probably a handful of other times.

But it's impressive as fuck.

catgrad97 wrote:

azcat49 wrote:

azcat49 wrote:69-7, its payback time. Cats find a way to erase that embarrassment..

Tate cements the star he is and the talk accelerates. Runs for 125 and throws for 250 today

I don't know what he had but it had to be close to these numbers. They can't stop him. No one can stop him. Damn it feels good. We will win out and I mean win out. PAC champions

Yeah, but Pac-12 Network still has Bryce Love as offensive player of the year ahead of Khalil Tate, so what do we know?

For now.

The future IS now, and Khalil Tate is it.

He beats SC next week, you PRY that damn award out of Larry Scott's hands. Seriously, Bryce freaking Love? On what, seniority? GTFO.

Don't see how you can't have Tate at least tied with Love for offensive POY at this point

catgrad97 wrote:The future IS now, and Khalil Tate is it.

He beats SC next week, you PRY that damn award out of Larry Scott's hands. Seriously, Bryce freaking Love? On what, seniority? GTFO.

Agree definitely if we beat SC

Let's doooo this

azgreg wrote:I don't have a good feeling about this one.

I'm feeling a bit better about this game now.

What a game! Can we please have at least one of these impressive performances on an actual network?

UAdevil wrote:What a game! Can we please have at least one of these impressive performances on an actual network?

Amen

ASUHATER! wrote:

Alieberman wrote:3 words:

Fire Rich Rod

I'm still definitely not against it

You are not an Arizona Wildcat fan

UAdevil wrote:What a game! Can we please have at least one of these impressive performances on an actual network?

Would be nice. I'm visiting my mother in Dallas so since she has cable the only video of the game I got was random ESPN highlights during the USC game.

101 plays...600 yards. 6 per play was high.

51 plays. 600 yards. Almost. Utterly efficient.

Then PI no call goes firing, fumbled punt, Khalil fumbling from air. Cats looked horrible at times, unbeatable at others.

Some facts...

40 points in 4 straight games. Has that been done?

Beat a team by 21 that beat you by 62 last year.

A TOP 10 defense at WSU gave up 8 plays of 20 or more yards all season (7 games). We had 11 in 1 game.

They couldn't run do they passed..we were in most trouble when we tried to rich. Better with our 2 DL rush and keeping in front, getting pics. 101 plays. Only 37 points. Convetional stats don't work here 101 to 51 plays? TOP in the 40/20 range. The winner...51 plays. The loser 101? When we get ressure we are worse

Any chance you can redo that post when you've had a few hours of recovery sleep?

Tate's first INT since replacing Dawkins, no less. WTH are the officials looking at?

catgrad97 wrote:Tate's only INT so far this season, no less. WTH are the officials looking at?

Second Int.

catgrad97 wrote:Tate's first INT since replacing Dawkins, no less. WTH are the officials looking at?

I think you've completely erased the Houston game out of your memory cg97.

Wish I could.

UAEebs86 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:Tate's first INT since replacing Dawkins, no less. WTH are the officials looking at?

I think you've completely erased the Houston game out of your memory cg97.

Wish I could.

I guess I have--I thought his only other pick was in that game, though. What am I missing?

catgrad97 wrote:

UAEebs86 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:Tate's first INT since replacing Dawkins, no less. WTH are the officials looking at?

I think you've completely erased the Houston game out of your memory cg97.

Wish I could.

I guess I have--I thought his only other pick was in that game, though. What am I missing?

He had an int at the end of the second half in the Cal game.

catgrad97 wrote:

UAEebs86 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:Tate's first INT since replacing Dawkins, no less. WTH are the officials looking at?

I think you've completely erased the Houston game out of your memory cg97.

Wish I could.

I guess I have--I thought his only other pick was in that game, though. What am I missing?

I misread your statement and I guess you meant since the Colorado game. He did replace Dawkins in the Houston game.

Also, in the game thread you mentioned him making his first mistake in the Wazzu game. I count the pick in the Houston game as one of those.

azgreg wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:

UAEebs86 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:Tate's first INT since replacing Dawkins, no less. WTH are the officials looking at?

I think you've completely erased the Houston game out of your memory cg97.

Wish I could.

I guess I have--I thought his only other pick was in that game, though. What am I missing?

He had an int at the end of the second half in the Cal game.

Totally forgot about that one. Thought we were done after that pick in Berkeley. Thank you azgreg.

Did anyone win the million dollars?

http://www.arizonawildcats.com/news/201 ... px?src=rss" target="_blank

Jefe wrote:Did anyone win the million dollars?

http://www.arizonawildcats.com/news/201 ... px?src=rss" target="_blank

A girl got picked and didn't come close on either one.