The State of the Program after Adia
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:07 am
I'm starting this since the coaching hot board and transfer palooza threads will soon by obsolete. I hope this is where we'll discuss moving the program forward - staffing, NIL, revenue sharing, etc.
So why not start with everyone's favorite local sports reporter, because we never get enough ad hominem argumentation ion this board.
So why not start with everyone's favorite local sports reporter, because we never get enough ad hominem argumentation ion this board.


I'm most concerned with the projected allocation of revenue sharing $$$$ ("2% of next year’s $20 million")As Arizona's Adia Barnes departs, what will her legacy be? | Greg Hansen
Greg Hansen Apr 8, 2025
Adia Barnes’ legacy at Arizona is unclear: Will she be remembered as the coach who led Arizona to the 2021 Final Four? Or will her legacy be that her program limped home the last few seasons, wrecked by an unusually high number of player defections?
Either way, she will join UCLA basketball coach Ben Howland and ASU football coach Bruce Snyder as the three most prominent ex-Pac-12 football/basketball coaches whose programs found greatness and then unexpectedly blew up.
Howland took over a 10-17 Bruins program from Steve Lavin in 2004 and went to three consecutive Final Fours, 2006-08. But he soon went 14-18 and 19-14 and was fired. What happened? All-Americans Kevin Love and Russell Westbrook went to the NBA.
Snyder took over a four-year, 22-21-1 program from Larry Marmie in 1992. By 1996, Snyder was at the Rose Bowl, 11-1, and was 30 seconds from winning the national championship. He soon went 5-6, 6-6 and 6-6 and was fired. What happened? QB Jake Plummer went to the NFL.
Barnes took over an absolute disaster from Niya Butts, five straight losing seasons, and went to the 2021 national championship game five years later. She soon went 18-16 and 19-14. What happened? Point guard Aari McDonald was in the WNBA, plus there were far too many key NIL player departures.
Barnes told me, in a very unhappy tone, that the UA women’s basketball team is projected to receive just 2% of next year’s $20 million revenue-sharing money, about $400,000, which means she would have difficulty competing in the NIL/free agent market. But that’s reality. Two percent is probably what most women’s basketball programs will receive.
The UA has revealed that Tommy Lloyd‘s men’s basketball team will receive about 21% of the revenue sharing, or about $4.2 million. The football program will get about 70%, or $15 million. Those are identical to the numbers Big 12 rival Texas Tech made public recently.
That leaves about 10% to divide between baseball, softball and women’s basketball.
I think that such an allocation means Arizona will NEVER be nationally competitive in Women's Basketball with this disparity! DISCUSSSEC schools, for instance, are expected to distribute their $20.5 million budgets by adapting the settlement’s back-pay formula: “75 percent to football players, 15 percent for men’s basketball, 5 percent for women’s basketball and 5 percent for others.” (Player payments in those first three would average in the low six figures or high fives, along with scholarships and NIL.)
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/626495 ... dailyemail