Bear Down Wildcats

...anyone watch it?

nope, why ya ask? isn't this the most beaten dead horse in this history of the media's murderporn obsession?

scumdevils86 wrote:nope, why ya ask? isn't this the most beaten dead horse in this history of the media's murderporn obsession?

Might be, for sure.

You know who killed her?

Feels pretty clear after watching that.

Did you know the empaneled grand jury (empaneled like in early 2000 or something) returned an indictment? (they got it right, by the way)

And that the sitting DA pocketed their indictment?

Turned out to be fairly interesting, imo.

I missed it.

So who killed her?

The brother supposedly

Chicat wrote:I missed it.

So who killed her?

As 49 says, the 9 year old brother and then the parents contaminated the scene/faked the scene, lawyered up and stonewalled police.

What the fuck?

Why would he do such a thing? Any theories?

She was the golden child and he was jealous? And then parents didn't want little son to get in trouble so they covered it up?

SCCats wrote:

Chicat wrote:I missed it.

So who killed her?

As 49 says, the 9 year old brother and then the parents contaminated the scene/faked the scene, lawyered up and stonewalled police.

Based upon what?

I would suggest watching the two hour tape from last night to both of you.

Apparently the brother had/has anger issues, and had hit Jon Benet prior with a golf club to her face. They suspect he hit her over the head with a flashlight killing her when she took some pineapple he was snacking on.

More here on the show: http://www.freep.com/story/entertainmen ... /90730438/" target="_blank

Going to have to watch for sure....

Chicat wrote:Going to have to watch for sure....

In the two hours last night there are some hokie parts. Ignore the hokie parts (like where they try to explain how touch DNA could get on something without having any of the actual pieces of evidence to look at but they don't want to just explain it so they're swabbing new underwear out of a box) and get to the rest.

But yeah its interesting to see the different parts of this thing and how they all seem to fit together.

Can chance at a new indictment on the kid now that mummy and daddy warbucks are 10ft under (and hopefully burning in hell, if that sort of thing exists)

CalStateTempe wrote:Can chance at a new indictment on the kid now that mummy and daddy warbucks are 10ft under (and hopefully burning in hell, if that sort of thing exists)

In Colorado, apparently a person under ten years old can not form the mental state to commit a crime. So my understanding is Burke can not be charged in any case.

But Dad is still alive (if I'm remembering correctly). Indictments against him (the ones the grand jury brought forward in 1999 that the DA pocketed) for obstruction, et all might be able to be revived depending on statutes.