Sean Miller

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:52 pm

Apologies, wrong thread. I came back after a pause and thought I was still in the Trump Cabinet thread.

TucsonClip · Post by **TucsonClip** » Thu Dec 08, 2016 5:11 pm

Longhorned wrote:Apologies, wrong thread. I came back after a pause and thought I was still in the Trump Cabinet thread.

What position did you get hired for?

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Thu Dec 08, 2016 5:28 pm

Longhorned wrote:Apologies, wrong thread. I came back after a pause and thought I was still in the Trump Cabinet thread.

I thought you just dropped a metaphor that was waay too deep for me.

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:00 pm

TucsonClip wrote:
Longhorned wrote:Apologies, wrong thread. I came back after a pause and thought I was still in the Trump Cabinet thread.
What position did you get hired for?

I pooped in the stock pot and got named Secretary of Soup.

TucsonClip · Post by **TucsonClip** » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:26 pm

Longhorned wrote:
TucsonClip wrote:
Longhorned wrote:Apologies, wrong thread. I came back after a pause and thought I was still in the Trump Cabinet thread.
What position did you get hired for?
I pooped in the stock pot and got named Secretary of Soup.

rgdeuce · Post by **rgdeuce** » Thu Dec 08, 2016 7:28 pm

Spaceman Spiff wrote:
Longhorned wrote:Apologies, wrong thread. I came back after a pause and thought I was still in the Trump Cabinet thread.
I thought you just dropped a metaphor that was waay too deep for me.

It fit with the Pitino tangent though lol

HiCat · Post by **HiCat** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:05 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcMeIjIuhz8" target="_blank

Miller:
"In short time, I'm hopeful that we can get some guys back..."..sic

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 4:06 pm

HiCat wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcMeIjIuhz8

Miller:
"In short time, I'm hopeful that we can get some guys back..."..sic

I am also hopeful about that.

gumby · Post by **gumby** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 5:07 pm

Plural!

PennZona20 · Post by **PennZona20** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 5:14 pm

It seems like Trier would be back for conference play. Knock on wood it happens and he gets cleared.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 5:58 pm

Well the GCU game next Wednesday is the last game of the semester. If it turns out to be a semester thing then he'd potentially be back for Texas A&M.

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:32 pm

ASUHATER! wrote:Well the GCU game next Wednesday is the last game of the semester. If it turns out to be a semester thing then he'd potentially be back for Texas A&M.

It's not a semester thing.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:36 pm

All we know now is that it's not drugs, not criminal, not a ncaa semester suspension, not academic...Basically everything has been ruled out by those "in the know(hah)".

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:45 pm

ASUHATER! wrote:All we know now is that it's not drugs, not criminal, not a ncaa semester suspension, not academic...Basically everything has been ruled out by those "in the know(hah)".

Never said it was none of those things.

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:37 am

PEDs still in his system administered at the hospital after the car crash?

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:36 am

So what is it if everyone under the Tucson sun is in the know?

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 12:06 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:So what is it if everyone under the Tucson sun is in the know?

No one is. No one I know knows what it is. The majority of people that "know" here are just crying wolf desparate for attention.

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 3:40 pm

ASUHATER! wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:So what is it if everyone under the Tucson sun is in the know?
No one is. No one I know knows what it is. The majority of people that "know" here are just crying wolf desparate for attention.

Good post.

Let me throw out a scenario to you, imagine there was an incident going on where the majority of people who genuinely care about the incident and its ramifications were unaware of the details for a very good specific reason, and imagine you happen to know somebody who is very involved in the incident due to its circumstances and that person keeps you up to date as he knows you care dearly and he trusts you not to blurt it out outside of providing approved vague hints.

Now imagine you run across a stranger on the internet who posts something as insecure and butt hurt as you just did. Would you go out of your way to tell him publicly or privately about what is going on? Would you trust such a person to be discrete? Would you risk your friendship with your buddy just to prove yourself to a person who reacts to adversity like you do?

Maybe if you portrayed yourself to be a levelheaded secure person maybe somebody who knows something (I'm far from the only one here) may reach out to you and throw you a bone once in awhile.

dcZONAfan · Post by **dcZONAfan** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 4:00 pm

ChooChooCat wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:So what is it if everyone under the Tucson sun is in the know?
No one is. No one I know knows what it is. The majority of people that "know" here are just crying wolf desparate for attention.
Good post.

Let me throw out a scenario to you, imagine there was an incident going on where the majority of people who genuinely care about the incident and its ramifications were unaware of the details for a very good specific reason, and imagine you happen to know somebody who is very involved in the incident due to its circumstances and that person keeps you up to date as he knows you care dearly and he trusts you not to blurt it out outside of providing approved vague hints.

Now imagine you run across a stranger on the internet who posts something as insecure and butt hurt as you just did. Would you go out of your way to tell him publicly or privately about what is going on? Would you trust such a person to be discrete? Would you risk your friendship with your buddy just to prove yourself to a person who reacts to adversity like you do?

Maybe if you portrayed yourself to be a levelheaded secure person maybe somebody who knows something (I'm far from the only one here) may reach out to you and throw you a bone once in awhile.

Haha, well damn Choo, i'm pretty levelheaded. I'd love to have some clarity as I sit here in Spain by myself with nobody to talk about this. I will patiently check my inbox ever 5 minutes, hoping you know I would revel in knowing while ASUhater and BeachCat don't.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 5:38 pm

dcZONAfan wrote:
ChooChooCat wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:So what is it if everyone under the Tucson sun is in the know?
No one is. No one I know knows what it is. The majority of people that "know" here are just crying wolf desparate for attention.
Good post.

Let me throw out a scenario to you, imagine there was an incident going on where the majority of people who genuinely care about the incident and its ramifications were unaware of the details for a very good specific reason, and imagine you happen to know somebody who is very involved in the incident due to its circumstances and that person keeps you up to date as he knows you care dearly and he trusts you not to blurt it out outside of providing approved vague hints.

Now imagine you run across a stranger on the internet who posts something as insecure and butt hurt as you just did. Would you go out of your way to tell him publicly or privately about what is going on? Would you trust such a person to be discrete? Would you risk your friendship with your buddy just to prove yourself to a person who reacts to adversity like you do?

Maybe if you portrayed yourself to be a levelheaded secure person maybe somebody who knows something (I'm far from the only one here) may reach out to you and throw you a bone once in awhile.
Haha, well damn Choo, i'm pretty levelheaded. I'd love to have some clarity as I sit here in Spain by myself with nobody to talk about this. I will patiently check my inbox ever 5 minutes, hoping you know I would revel in knowing while ASUhater and BeachCat don't.

I'm in this camp too. I'd like to think I'm a reasonable person and have a few contacts here have trust me with confidential information, but as far as this situation goes, my inbox remains empty.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 8:23 pm

What a douchey post by choo. Just another person trying to pretend they are important because they supposedly know something.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 8:45 pm

Damn you fuckers are testy. Is it because tomorrow is Monday?

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:21 pm

ChooChooCat wrote:
Maybe if you portrayed yourself to be a levelheaded secure person maybe somebody who knows something (I'm far from the only one here) may reach out to you and throw you a bone once in awhile.

ASUHATER! wrote:What a douchey post by choo. Just another person trying to pretend they are important because they supposedly know something.

Well don't let anybody tell you that you're not consistent. You certainly are that my friend.

PennZona20 · Post by **PennZona20** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:59 am

ChooChooCat wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:So what is it if everyone under the Tucson sun is in the know?
No one is. No one I know knows what it is. The majority of people that "know" here are just crying wolf desparate for attention.
Good post.

Let me throw out a scenario to you, imagine there was an incident going on where the majority of people who genuinely care about the incident and its ramifications were unaware of the details for a very good specific reason, and imagine you happen to know somebody who is very involved in the incident due to its circumstances and that person keeps you up to date as he knows you care dearly and he trusts you not to blurt it out outside of providing approved vague hints.

Now imagine you run across a stranger on the internet who posts something as insecure and butt hurt as you just did. Would you go out of your way to tell him publicly or privately about what is going on? Would you trust such a person to be discrete? Would you risk your friendship with your buddy just to prove yourself to a person who reacts to adversity like you do?

Maybe if you portrayed yourself to be a levelheaded secure person maybe somebody who knows something (I'm far from the only one here) may reach out to you and throw you a bone once in awhile.

Well considering I've been trying to PM u and anyone that implies they know details but the website won't let me PM anybody makes me suspicious? This whole "I know things but I can't tell you peasants who don't" is admittedly a bit frustrating. I live on east coast but I still have about half a dozen friends in Arizona and none of them know either (granted they aren't as big of fanatics as I am).

This is seriously the biggest tease of all time. I'd rather go get a private at a strip club than come to the Trier threads anymore. But much like the strizzy, I can't help it.

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 6:40 am

Think about it: If there were either an expected date for Trier's return, or lack of an expectation that he will return, Miller would have said. Clearly Miller has reason to expect he will return, but can't know when. What else beyond that would be valuable to know?

Beachcat97 · Post by **Beachcat97** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:03 am

What was he saying about Pitts last year around this time?

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:08 am

PennZona20 wrote:Well considering I've been trying to PM u and anyone that implies they know details but the website won't let me PM anybody makes me suspicious?

Huh?

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:12 am

Beachcat97 wrote:What was he saying about Pitts last year around this time?

When Pitts was suspended, the same basic line was put out, i.e., the sort of thing that didn't answer any questions. Miller runs a pretty tight ship. The fact that anyone is still in the dark to any extent about Trier is unusual.

So, don't get hopes up that there will be a flood of info.

PHXCATS · Post by **PHXCATS** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:43 am

We will know when we know. Does it really matter what he did or didn't do? Doesn't it really matter if you know a few days or weeks before the rest of the world does? I applaud Miller for his handle on the situation.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:49 am

PHXCATS wrote:We will know when we know. Does it really matter what he did or didn't do? Doesn't it really matter if you know a few days or weeks before the rest of the world does? I applaud Miller for his handle on the situation.

As fans, none of us need to know anything. We just want to know.

In terms of the program, I have zero doubt that our players and coaches have focus on the moment at hand. We have 7 guys and the focus is on them with an eye towards developing when PJC returns and if Trier is back.

It's easy to overcomplicate things, but the reality is really simple.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:53 am

PennZona20 wrote:Well considering I've been trying to PM u and anyone that implies they know details but the website won't let me PM anybody makes me suspicious?

The PM function hasn't worked on this site for quite awhile.
PMs I try to send just sit in my Outbox.

I mentioned this to the admins but it never got fixed.

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 12:39 pm

Longhorned wrote:Think about it: If there were either an expected date for Trier's return, or lack of an expectation that he will return, Miller would have said. Clearly Miller has reason to expect he will return, but can't know when. What else beyond that would be valuable to know?

Bingo.

gumby · Post by **gumby** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:06 pm

UAEebs86 wrote:
PennZona20 wrote:Well considering I've been trying to PM u and anyone that implies they know details but the website won't let me PM anybody makes me suspicious?
The PM function hasn't worked on this site for quite awhile.
PMs I try to send just sit in my Outbox.

I mentioned this to the admins but it never got fixed.

So that one I sent to Longhorned about Trier's return date didn't get there? Explains a lot.

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:09 pm

Just because gumby briefs me doesn't mean I read it.

gumby · Post by **gumby** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:12 pm

You're, like, a very smart person.

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:16 pm

I'm refreshing. And you're the one who told us Rob Evans had a secret weapon.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:54 pm

UAEebs86 wrote:
PennZona20 wrote:Well considering I've been trying to PM u and anyone that implies they know details but the website won't let me PM anybody makes me suspicious?
The PM function hasn't worked on this site for quite awhile.
PMs I try to send just sit in my Outbox.

I mentioned this to the admins but it never got fixed.

Works fine for me. If they are in your outbox it means the other person hasn't read it yet.

Send me a PM and I'll send one back once received.

Post by **UAdevil** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:03 pm

PMs seem to be working just fine for me.

gumby · Post by **gumby** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:41 pm

Damn. Now Longhorned knows I'm a liar!

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Mon Dec 12, 2016 4:27 pm

Chicat wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:
PennZona20 wrote:Well considering I've been trying to PM u and anyone that implies they know details but the website won't let me PM anybody makes me suspicious?
The PM function hasn't worked on this site for quite awhile.
PMs I try to send just sit in my Outbox.

I mentioned this to the admins but it never got fixed.
Works fine for me. If they are in your outbox it means the other person hasn't read it yet.

Send me a PM and I'll send one back once received.

That worked, but I sent a PM to Merkin awhile back that just sat in my Outbox for months, until I finally just deleted it.

Maybe he didn't want to talk to me!

HiCat · Post by **HiCat** » Tue Dec 13, 2016 3:21 am

Sean Miller says college basketball becoming more like NBA

http://tucson.com/online/video/watch-se ... b60f1.html" target="_blank

PennZona20 · Post by **PennZona20** » Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:32 am

UAEebs86 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:
PennZona20 wrote:Well considering I've been trying to PM u and anyone that implies they know details but the website won't let me PM anybody makes me suspicious?
The PM function hasn't worked on this site for quite awhile.
PMs I try to send just sit in my Outbox.

I mentioned this to the admins but it never got fixed.
Works fine for me. If they are in your outbox it means the other person hasn't read it yet.

Send me a PM and I'll send one back once received.

That worked, but I sent a PM to Merkin awhile back that just sat in my Outbox for months, until I finally just deleted it.

Maybe he didn't want to talk to me!

Ok so I'm an idiot. I was putting the subject line in to CC: line because I already linked to person I sent to.

So in summation, the PM works. My brain does not. Sorry about the confusion.

And the reason I want to know, isn't because I think it will better help me pinpoint a return date, it's the same reason I want to know something when someone says they heard a crazy rumor about the office skank but can't tell me. Don't tell me u know something if u won't tell me. It drives me crazy.

HiCat · Post by **HiCat** » Thu Dec 15, 2016 6:40 am

Miller, Kobi Simmons talk Arizona Wildcats' 64-54 win over Grand Canyon

http://tucson.com/online/video/watch-mi ... 7fc6b.html" target="_blank

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Sat Dec 17, 2016 1:00 pm

https://youtu.be/4x43jQEiLAY" target="_blank

84Cat · Post by **84Cat** » Sat Dec 17, 2016 1:02 pm

Spaceman Spiff wrote:https://youtu.be/4x43jQEiLAY

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Sat Dec 17, 2016 1:25 pm

Needs to cut out the prevent offense too early in the game.

HiCat · Post by **HiCat** » Sat Dec 17, 2016 3:26 pm

All I want for Xmas..

Miller hinted that Jackson-Cartwright is ahead of schedule in his recovery.

“We’re anxious to get him back. I think he’s moving in the direction of coming back,” Miller told reporters. “I’m hoping that we can have a couple good weeks here, we can get him back more towards the beginning of the conference season.”

http://www.azdesertswarm.com/basketball ... onzo-trier" target="_blank

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Sat Dec 17, 2016 3:59 pm

You don't rush a high ankle sprain.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Sat Dec 17, 2016 4:22 pm

ChooChooCat wrote:You don't rush a high ankle sprain.

You don't triple stamp a double stamp.

EVCat · Post by **EVCat** » Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:21 am

He was out of the boot a while back, which was a surprise.

Everyone responds different to ankle sprains. Some are more responsive to the treatments. There is little to compare case to case. The schedule gives us another almost 2 weeks with one game...no need to rush him back. But good to hear he is ahead of schedule

Login • Register