Bear Down Wildcats

Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.

splitsecond wrote:How does Self so consistently take 5 star players and make them as soft as baby shit?

catgrad97 wrote:Notre Dame should get the 2 seed over Kansas.

qwertyus wrote:This Kansas-ISU game is absolutely torture to watch. Terrible both ways.

enfuego wrote:

Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.

Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

Ernst Stavro Blofeld wrote:One may blow up Kansas and the world may not hear about it.

Thomas Frank wrote:
There is something in the state that creates real geniuses of averageness. But it's also this weird kind of averageness. It's definitely the place where test-marketers go, but it's not a normal kind of averageness; it's almost an outraged 'averageness,' an exceptionally determined will to be 'average.'

enfuego wrote:Oregon - Kenpom 46
Iowa State - Kenpom 13

Keep crowing about that dominant win over a crappy team.

Zero wrote:Whichever 1 seed gets Kansas as it's 2 is going to be very happy. They won't even make it to the second weekend. Notre Dame should be getting that 2 seed.

salim'sheadband wrote:It is unbelievable how weak-minded this Kansas team is:

enfuego wrote:

SCCats wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:How about a side bet that a seven-loss team isn't getting a 2 seed.

Of course for Kansas that's the bet I'm proposing. But Enfuego will say he didn't come back today or tomorrow or whatever other day he needs to say to not technically be a part of the bet because he knows what will happen.

The important lesson here actually is for the lower boards: when you know what a person's disposition is, when you know what a nation is going to do, you can use that against them. Here, there, wherever: I know what your disposition is, and I can use it against you to trap you. To put you in an untenable place.

Here Enfuego will NEVER respond to my bet. He can't; he's in a lose/lose spot. And what's the worse case for me? I lose $100?

I've won before he's even responded because I've trapped him into saying Kansas is a 2 seed.

Kansas deserves a 2 seed. Why would I bet on something which the team can't control (no, they can't control the politics of the committee member's bias). It's been a while since KU last played Arizona and gave your team a beat down. Maybe Arizona will be the three seed in our Bracket in the Midwest Region this March?

enfuego wrote:

enfuego wrote:

SCCats wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:How about a side bet that a seven-loss team isn't getting a 2 seed.

Of course for Kansas that's the bet I'm proposing. But Enfuego will say he didn't come back today or tomorrow or whatever other day he needs to say to not technically be a part of the bet because he knows what will happen.

The important lesson here actually is for the lower boards: when you know what a person's disposition is, when you know what a nation is going to do, you can use that against them. Here, there, wherever: I know what your disposition is, and I can use it against you to trap you. To put you in an untenable place.

Here Enfuego will NEVER respond to my bet. He can't; he's in a lose/lose spot. And what's the worse case for me? I lose $100?

I've won before he's even responded because I've trapped him into saying Kansas is a 2 seed.

Kansas deserves a 2 seed. Why would I bet on something which the team can't control (no, they can't control the politics of the committee member's bias). It's been a while since KU last played Arizona and gave your team a beat down. Maybe Arizona will be the three seed in our Bracket in the Midwest Region this March?

Someone owes me $100.

Chicat wrote:

enfuego wrote:

enfuego wrote:

SCCats wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:How about a side bet that a seven-loss team isn't getting a 2 seed.

Of course for Kansas that's the bet I'm proposing. But Enfuego will say he didn't come back today or tomorrow or whatever other day he needs to say to not technically be a part of the bet because he knows what will happen.

The important lesson here actually is for the lower boards: when you know what a person's disposition is, when you know what a nation is going to do, you can use that against them. Here, there, wherever: I know what your disposition is, and I can use it against you to trap you. To put you in an untenable place.

Here Enfuego will NEVER respond to my bet. He can't; he's in a lose/lose spot. And what's the worse case for me? I lose $100?

I've won before he's even responded because I've trapped him into saying Kansas is a 2 seed.

Kansas deserves a 2 seed. Why would I bet on something which the team can't control (no, they can't control the politics of the committee member's bias). It's been a while since KU last played Arizona and gave your team a beat down. Maybe Arizona will be the three seed in our Bracket in the Midwest Region this March?

Someone owes me $100.

This is when I wish we still had that rolling/laughing emoticon.

enfuego wrote:I think UA got a gift for staying in the West. Kansas in the toughest region top to bottom. South the weakest region. Bad overall seeding by the committee this year.

dirtbags wrote:congrats to ku for the extremely favorable draw. no excuse for the jaywalks to not make a deep deep run. see u in indy, kansans.

enfuego wrote:

dirtbags wrote:congrats to ku for the extremely favorable draw. no excuse for the jaywalks to not make a deep deep run. see u in indy, kansans.

Favorable draw? BS. Everyone is calling it the toughest region. I think Arizona should be worried as a #2 seed. I believe Arizona holds the record for the number of first and second round flame outs as a #2 seed.

enfuego wrote:

Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.

Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

Main Event wrote:

enfuego wrote:

Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.

Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

lol

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=13732227

azgreg wrote: His own fan base thinks he's a dipshit.

Main Event wrote:

enfuego wrote:

Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.

Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

lol

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=13732227

Harvey Specter wrote:

Main Event wrote:

enfuego wrote:

Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.

Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

lol

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=13732227

Enfuego seems to have a similar mindset to KU & Arizona as BeachCat has to Arizona and UCLA.