Re: Coach Rod
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:15 pm
Do we know when the interview is? If he doesn't get the South Carolina job he fucked himself in recruiting super hard!!!
German I am not Chi town. It's all fun and games until..,,oh, let's wait till next season.Chicat wrote:ChiefSchadenfreude, ladies and gentlemen.
Well given the amount of shit that posters have gotten (from the slurpers) for questioning and challenging RR on a number of fronts, he'll deserve to gloat a little bit if RR bolts.Chicat wrote:ChiefSchadenfreude, ladies and gentlemen.
How will bruins01 know to call me a racist asshole without my own thread? Please unmerge. You're intentionally trying to ruin my experience here.Chicat wrote:Merged your thread into this one Dill . . . . mostly because if I see another thread dedicated to whether RichRod will stay or go I might drink cheap whiskey until my liver falls out of my butthole.
I'd need a little bit of time, but off the top of my head I would rather see Matt Wells or Dino Babers get a shot. And that's not stretching with guys we MIGHT have a chance at, either.Chicat wrote:You going to tell us who you would want?Harvey Specter wrote:So he can demand a raise in 3 years after winning 25% of his conference games? No thank you.Irish27 wrote:Get Sonny Dykes on the phone.
Any success whatsoever and he will punch his ticket as quickly as he can get out of town. That would be 3 schools in 5 years... The guy makes Graham look sedentary.
All coaches are mercenaries but he's at the extreme. His ambition casts a long shadow over his ability; the potential reward does not outweigh the risk.
He writes for ZZ. And has 88 followers and tweets out things like this:RazorsEdgeAZ wrote:
Some people only show up when things are looking bleak or after losses. They seem to take special pleasure when things have gone wrong for the program and its fans. I have no issues with criticism of RR. He certainly deserves his fair share. No coach or leader is infallible. But to act like fans are dumb for wanting RR to succeed and for the team to do well, and that's your only schtick, is not something that sits well with me. Never will.Harvey Specter wrote:Well given the amount of shit that posters have gotten (from the slurpers) for questioning and challenging RR on a number of fronts, he'll deserve to gloat a little bit if RR bolts.Chicat wrote:ChiefSchadenfreude, ladies and gentlemen.
I am still hoping chief does not get that opportunity... But the degree to which I rue the thought of RR leaving is dropping by the minute.
PS - Whose misfortune is chief celebrating? Certainly not RR whose already rich and going to get richer, no matter how this ends.
How do either of those guys systems fit our current personnel?Harvey Specter wrote:I'd need a little bit of time, but off the top of my head I would rather see Matt Wells or Dino Babers get a shot. And that's not stretching with guys we MIGHT have a chance at, either.Chicat wrote:You going to tell us who you would want?Harvey Specter wrote:So he can demand a raise in 3 years after winning 25% of his conference games? No thank you.Irish27 wrote:Get Sonny Dykes on the phone.
Any success whatsoever and he will punch his ticket as quickly as he can get out of town. That would be 3 schools in 5 years... The guy makes Graham look sedentary.
All coaches are mercenaries but he's at the extreme. His ambition casts a long shadow over his ability; the potential reward does not outweigh the risk.
Some people are continuously on Twitter and not a free message board.Chicat wrote:Some people only show up when things are looking bleak or after losses. They seem to take special pleasure when things have gone wrong for the program and its fans. I have no issues with criticism of RR. He certainly deserves his fair share. No coach or leader is infallible. But to act like fans are dumb for wanting RR to succeed and for the team to do well, and that's your only schtick, is not something that sits well with me. Never will.Harvey Specter wrote:Well given the amount of shit that posters have gotten (from the slurpers) for questioning and challenging RR on a number of fronts, he'll deserve to gloat a little bit if RR bolts.Chicat wrote:ChiefSchadenfreude, ladies and gentlemen.
I am still hoping chief does not get that opportunity... But the degree to which I rue the thought of RR leaving is dropping by the minute.
PS - Whose misfortune is chief celebrating? Certainly not RR whose already rich and going to get richer, no matter how this ends.
This shit screams of Rich Rod's agent trying to leverage Byrne. Good luck with that.RazorsEdgeAZ wrote:Can make a case he has already. Not to publicly knock down the report. That's a decision (so far) that he wants to pursue other job. If it was false or something he didn't want to check out, he could knock it down. I'm sure he knows about it. Staying quiet (as we know) is a decision.chiefzona wrote:He's losing recruits. He has to make a decision quickly.
Or he's made a decision to leverage Byrne for more OR he's made the decision to go through the process and have the decision made for him by not getting an offer etc. But this decision takes time to play out.
Lots of decisions to make in this process. So far, he seems to already made some...
I honestly don't see this as a push for more money, mainly because there isn't significantly more being offered by South Carolina and there isn't much room in that regard at UA. So if it is a shakedown, it was poorly thought out and won't be very successful.ChooChooCat wrote:This shit screams of Rich Rod's agent trying to leverage Byrne. Good luck with that.RazorsEdgeAZ wrote:Can make a case he has already. Not to publicly knock down the report. That's a decision (so far) that he wants to pursue other job. If it was false or something he didn't want to check out, he could knock it down. I'm sure he knows about it. Staying quiet (as we know) is a decision.chiefzona wrote:He's losing recruits. He has to make a decision quickly.
Or he's made a decision to leverage Byrne for more OR he's made the decision to go through the process and have the decision made for him by not getting an offer etc. But this decision takes time to play out.
Lots of decisions to make in this process. So far, he seems to already made some...
Maybe it helps push the timeline on an indoor facility....maybe?
I think it's more of a shakedown in regards to speeding up the process on football facilities and not money honestly. Although do we actually know just how much SC would offer at this point? They're in pure desperation mode for sure and have more than enough money from SEC TV contracts alone to dwarf Arizona if need be. I mean look at the names associated with this search, Muschamp? Lincoln Riley? At this point Rich Rod is a homerun for them based on the circumstances.Chicat wrote:I honestly don't see this as a push for more money, mainly because there isn't significantly more being offered by South Carolina and there isn't much room in that regard at UA. So if it is a shakedown, it was poorly thought out and won't be very successful.ChooChooCat wrote:This shit screams of Rich Rod's agent trying to leverage Byrne. Good luck with that.RazorsEdgeAZ wrote:Can make a case he has already. Not to publicly knock down the report. That's a decision (so far) that he wants to pursue other job. If it was false or something he didn't want to check out, he could knock it down. I'm sure he knows about it. Staying quiet (as we know) is a decision.chiefzona wrote:He's losing recruits. He has to make a decision quickly.
Or he's made a decision to leverage Byrne for more OR he's made the decision to go through the process and have the decision made for him by not getting an offer etc. But this decision takes time to play out.
Lots of decisions to make in this process. So far, he seems to already made some...
Maybe it helps push the timeline on an indoor facility....maybe?
Yeah but he's not a $4.5M/yr homerun. Not coming off 6-6 and bringing the 3-3-5 to the SEC. South Carolina fans may not be crazy with their expectations and demands, but I honestly think they'd riot if that was where his contract ended up being at.ChooChooCat wrote:I think it's more of a shakedown in regards to speeding up the process on football facilities and not money honestly. Although do we actually know just how much SC would offer at this point? They're in pure desperation mode for sure and have more than enough money from SEC TV contracts alone to dwarf Arizona if need be. I mean look at the names associated with this search, Muschamp? Lincoln Riley? At this point Rich Rod is a homerun for them based on the circumstances.
Chicat wrote:Got to keep those 250 followers constantly updated huh?
What if they pay him enough to leave Jeff behind?CatsbyAZ wrote:Unless SC has an AD that ignores the boosters and alums, Rich Rod won't be going to SoCarolina. Those two groups are already grumbling no. Imagine this year's AZ defense playing against the SEC. No thanks, they are saying.
You definitely got me there.Chicat wrote:Yeah but he's not a $4.5M/yr homerun. Not coming off 6-6 and bringing the 3-3-5 to the SEC. South Carolina fans may not be crazy with their expectations and demands, but I honestly think they'd riot if that was where his contract ended up being at.ChooChooCat wrote:I think it's more of a shakedown in regards to speeding up the process on football facilities and not money honestly. Although do we actually know just how much SC would offer at this point? They're in pure desperation mode for sure and have more than enough money from SEC TV contracts alone to dwarf Arizona if need be. I mean look at the names associated with this search, Muschamp? Lincoln Riley? At this point Rich Rod is a homerun for them based on the circumstances.
The 3-3-5 has been in the SEC before. Charlie Strong ran it AT South Carolina when he was DC. Joe Lee Dunn had success with it at Ole Miss under Billy Brewer and at Miss St under Jackie Sherrill.Chicat wrote:Yeah but he's not a $4.5M/yr homerun. Not coming off 6-6 and bringing the 3-3-5 to the SEC. South Carolina fans may not be crazy with their expectations and demands, but I honestly think they'd riot if that was where his contract ended up being at.ChooChooCat wrote:I think it's more of a shakedown in regards to speeding up the process on football facilities and not money honestly. Although do we actually know just how much SC would offer at this point? They're in pure desperation mode for sure and have more than enough money from SEC TV contracts alone to dwarf Arizona if need be. I mean look at the names associated with this search, Muschamp? Lincoln Riley? At this point Rich Rod is a homerun for them based on the circumstances.
Where are the South Carolina boards? Scout's is vacant. Rivals?azpenguin wrote:The South Carolina boards are saying it's Muschamp even with the extra interviews being done.
I don't hold him talking to SC against him, considering he hasn't promised the fans or media that he's not going anywhere. He could be looking at a pay increase of 30-50% there, and pretty much any of us would entertain that. Lute talked to Kentucky. Tomey talked to Miami and Washington. Miller talked to Maryland. It happens.
http://southcarolina.forums.rivals.com/ ... -forum.10/" target="_blankCatsbyAZ wrote:Where are the South Carolina boards? Scout's is vacant. Rivals?azpenguin wrote:The South Carolina boards are saying it's Muschamp even with the extra interviews being done.
I don't hold him talking to SC against him, considering he hasn't promised the fans or media that he's not going anywhere. He could be looking at a pay increase of 30-50% there, and pretty much any of us would entertain that. Lute talked to Kentucky. Tomey talked to Miami and Washington. Miller talked to Maryland. It happens.
The big one for them is cockytalk.com as far as I've found. Their thread on the coach search has over 21,000 replies and there's a new page worth every few minutes.CatsbyAZ wrote:Where are the South Carolina boards? Scout's is vacant. Rivals?azpenguin wrote:The South Carolina boards are saying it's Muschamp even with the extra interviews being done.
I don't hold him talking to SC against him, considering he hasn't promised the fans or media that he's not going anywhere. He could be looking at a pay increase of 30-50% there, and pretty much any of us would entertain that. Lute talked to Kentucky. Tomey talked to Miami and Washington. Miller talked to Maryland. It happens.
I looked at that board name all strange, wondering why they called their board that.azpenguin wrote:The big one for them is cockytalk.com as far as I've found.
The other day my wife went on our tablet and yells out, "What the fuck?? Why are you going to CockTalk.com???"SCCats wrote:I looked at that board name all strange, wondering why they called their board that.azpenguin wrote:The big one for them is cockytalk.com as far as I've found.
Took about three seconds to figure it out.
AAAAAAAND there it is.Chicat wrote:The other day my wife went on our tablet and yells out, "What the fuck?? Why are you going to CockTalk.com???"
Are we talking "come close to winning the SEC" success or "made a shit bowl a few times" success?wyo-cat wrote:The 3-3-5 has been in the SEC before. Charlie Strong ran it AT South Carolina when he was DC. Joe Lee Dunn had success with it at Ole Miss under Billy Brewer and at Miss St under Jackie Sherrill.Chicat wrote:Yeah but he's not a $4.5M/yr homerun. Not coming off 6-6 and bringing the 3-3-5 to the SEC. South Carolina fans may not be crazy with their expectations and demands, but I honestly think they'd riot if that was where his contract ended up being at.ChooChooCat wrote:I think it's more of a shakedown in regards to speeding up the process on football facilities and not money honestly. Although do we actually know just how much SC would offer at this point? They're in pure desperation mode for sure and have more than enough money from SEC TV contracts alone to dwarf Arizona if need be. I mean look at the names associated with this search, Muschamp? Lincoln Riley? At this point Rich Rod is a homerun for them based on the circumstances.
I think she cares what kind of porno, and she'd rather it not be left up on the tablet our kids use.scumdevils86 wrote:femcat cares if you watch pornoz?
RR to Auburn as DC.azpenguin wrote:The South Carolina boards are saying it's Muschamp even with the extra interviews being done.
I don't hold him talking to SC against him, considering he hasn't promised the fans or media that he's not going anywhere. He could be looking at a pay increase of 30-50% there, and pretty much any of us would entertain that. Lute talked to Kentucky. Tomey talked to Miami and Washington. Miller talked to Maryland. It happens.
RR to ASU as the OC.Spaceman Spiff wrote:RR to Auburn as DC.
fair enough. they gotta learn sometime though.Chicat wrote:I think she cares what kind of porno, and she'd rather it not be left up on the tablet our kids use.scumdevils86 wrote:femcat cares if you watch pornoz?
That is honestly not a factor at all to me... It's not as if I see tremendous success in our immediate future if we bring in a coach with "the right scheme". I am more concerned about a guy who can recruit, develop and scheme to build a good team & program over time. If we suck in the immediate term everyone will chalk it up to "the cupboard being bare" anyways. It's standard fare...Chicat wrote:How do either of those guys systems fit our current personnel?Harvey Specter wrote:I'd need a little bit of time, but off the top of my head I would rather see Matt Wells or Dino Babers get a shot. And that's not stretching with guys we MIGHT have a chance at, either.Chicat wrote:You going to tell us who you would want?Harvey Specter wrote:So he can demand a raise in 3 years after winning 25% of his conference games? No thank you.Irish27 wrote:Get Sonny Dykes on the phone.
Any success whatsoever and he will punch his ticket as quickly as he can get out of town. That would be 3 schools in 5 years... The guy makes Graham look sedentary.
All coaches are mercenaries but he's at the extreme. His ambition casts a long shadow over his ability; the potential reward does not outweigh the risk.
So why did RR make SC an offer they could not accept? Was Scheer completely wrong on that one?Chicat wrote:I honestly don't see this as a push for more money, mainly because there isn't significantly more being offered by South Carolina and there isn't much room in that regard at UA. So if it is a shakedown, it was poorly thought out and won't be very successful.ChooChooCat wrote:This shit screams of Rich Rod's agent trying to leverage Byrne. Good luck with that.RazorsEdgeAZ wrote:Can make a case he has already. Not to publicly knock down the report. That's a decision (so far) that he wants to pursue other job. If it was false or something he didn't want to check out, he could knock it down. I'm sure he knows about it. Staying quiet (as we know) is a decision.chiefzona wrote:He's losing recruits. He has to make a decision quickly.
Or he's made a decision to leverage Byrne for more OR he's made the decision to go through the process and have the decision made for him by not getting an offer etc. But this decision takes time to play out.
Lots of decisions to make in this process. So far, he seems to already made some...
Maybe it helps push the timeline on an indoor facility....maybe?
I think RR has a genuine interest in getting back to the east coast. Not only for personal reasons but also to alleviate many of the issues he's complained about as far as recruiting, long distance road trips, and stupid start times.
As far as Feldman's tweet, he worked with RR at CBS. So I would guess that's where the interview info came from.
Considering the cupboard is bare in talent in the LB corps and I can't name a single DL worth half a damn, I'd have to say I'd agree. That's not even touching on the back 5 of the defense. At least we have Nick Wilson...when healthy.Harvey Specter wrote:
I am not convinced that our existing personnel suits our current scheme especially well, anyway.
I don't think fans really care how much their new coach is making... Only whether or not they are happy to have him. South Carolina is down to their "Plan C" list... and they all know it. And Rich Rod is a damn fine "Plan C".Chicat wrote:Yeah but he's not a $4.5M/yr homerun. Not coming off 6-6 and bringing the 3-3-5 to the SEC. South Carolina fans may not be crazy with their expectations and demands, but I honestly think they'd riot if that was where his contract ended up being at.ChooChooCat wrote:I think it's more of a shakedown in regards to speeding up the process on football facilities and not money honestly. Although do we actually know just how much SC would offer at this point? They're in pure desperation mode for sure and have more than enough money from SEC TV contracts alone to dwarf Arizona if need be. I mean look at the names associated with this search, Muschamp? Lincoln Riley? At this point Rich Rod is a homerun for them based on the circumstances.
Auburn wants to run the 3-3-5, so I wouldn't count them out.SCCats wrote:RR to ASU as the OC.Spaceman Spiff wrote:RR to Auburn as DC.
They couldn't get Gruden or Cowher so their fallback is Rich.
I'm just spitballing, but it wouldn't be the first time someone threw out a crazy number in a negotiation that was then actually considered. RR obviously isn't so in love with Tucson that making significantly more money wouldn't sway him to look at a situation that has a lot of the things he's looking for in a job and that UA can't offer.Harvey Specter wrote:So why did RR make SC an offer they could not accept? Was Scheer completely wrong on that one?