AdjO

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns

Post Reply
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

#5

AdjD is #7...so technically the offense is better than the defense currently.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 45155
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3371
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: AdjO

Post by Chicat »

We suck.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
User avatar
Alieberman
Posts: 13400
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
Reputation: 2561
Location: I can't find my pants

Re: AdjO

Post by Alieberman »

Can 1 of you basketball nerds explain to one of us basketball idiots who just like watching the big orange ball go through the net thingy, what AdjO and AdjD actually mean / measure?
User avatar
TheBlackLodge
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 1:51 am
Reputation: 0

Re: AdjO

Post by TheBlackLodge »

Alieberman wrote:Can 1 of you basketball nerds explain to one of us basketball idiots who just like watching the big orange ball go through the net thingy, what AdjO and AdjD actually mean / measure?
Here's a good place to start: http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog ... s_glossary
Formerly McLurvin
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

So in basic terms, AdjO is adjusted offense or the points scored per 100 possessions. AdjD is the opposite...points given up per 100 possessions.

So basically shoot really well and as often as possible...and allow the reverse on defense.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
Alieberman
Posts: 13400
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
Reputation: 2561
Location: I can't find my pants

Re: AdjO

Post by Alieberman »

Thanks nerds!

So basically it's about efficiency?
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

Alieberman wrote:Thanks nerds!

So basically it's about efficiency?
Yes. How efficient are you at scoring when you possess the ball.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Catstatic
Posts: 321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:49 am
Reputation: 0

Re: AdjO

Post by Catstatic »

Olsondogg wrote:#5

AdjD is #7...so technically the offense is better than the defense currently.
And we have yet to come close to playing a complete game. I have no doubt our guys will be right there in March with as good as a chance as anyone (even Kentucky) of winning the entire thing.

Go Cats!!
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

It's funny...the narrative that I read and hear, especially from CBB "experts" on TV seldom holds up statistically. I remember hearing Maclean lament free throw shooting and how bad it's become across CBB, when in fact its never been better.

People can whine about "slow starts" and such, and that's fine. I wish we started games better too. But it's not how you start it's how you finish. Offensively, statistically speaking, this team is more than fine.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
KaibabKat
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 215

Re: AdjO

Post by KaibabKat »

Points per Attempt (PPA) is not nearly as sophisticated as Ken Pomeroy's AdjO but it is still a pretty good measure of overall offensive efficiency.

Here are how Arizona teams rank in PPA (by coach):
1.35 Olson
1.38 O'Neill
1.34 Pennell
1.34 Miller

Highest = 1.54 = 1987-88
Lowest = 1.19 = 2005-06

Only years since 1986-87 considered (three point shot adopted).
cats101
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 12
Location: Washington, DC

Re: AdjO

Post by cats101 »

Oh wow but averaging 85+ ppg is more important.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

It slipped to #6 in adjo

And #12 in adjd

We suck
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

AdjO still in top 20 at #15 (AdJD atg #8).

Also sit at #11 in FG %, and are averaging a respectable 76 PPG...but I keep hearing from all sides how offense is a problem....

Can someone explain?
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
KaibabKat
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 215

Re: AdjO

Post by KaibabKat »

It all depends where you look and whose numbers you like I suppose.

This site http://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/sch ... /2015.html says:

50th Points scored/game
47th Points allowed/game
15th Simple Rating System
85th Strength of Schedule
36th Offensive Rating
34th Defensive Rating
User avatar
salim'sheadband
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:02 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: AdjO

Post by salim'sheadband »

Arguably more importantly, we're top 30 in raw efficiency. Coming around.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

KaibabKat wrote:It all depends where you look and whose numbers you like I suppose.

This site http://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/sch ... /2015.html says:

50th Points scored/game
47th Points allowed/game
15th Simple Rating System
85th Strength of Schedule
36th Offensive Rating
34th Defensive Rating

Ok, so when I hear about offense, tell me the numbers that support the "Arizona struggles offensively" or "Arizona is not efficient".
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
Puerco
Posts: 3113
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 12:53 am
Reputation: 0

Re: AdjO

Post by Puerco »

Well, i admittedly don't know the difference between Kenpom and team rankings and sports reference, but if our offensive efficiency is ranked only around 30th, then I'm happy to admit that I'm worried.

Happily, I can choose to believe Kenpom instead of the others. Just because I want to.
'A parent is the one person who is supposed to make their kid think they can do anything. Says they're beautiful even when they're ugly. Thinks they're smart even when they go to Arizona State.' -- Jack Donaghy
User avatar
KaibabKat
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 215

Re: AdjO

Post by KaibabKat »

Olsondogg wrote:Ok, so when I hear about offense, tell me the numbers that support the "Arizona struggles offensively" or "Arizona is not efficient".
Well, you could go here: http://www.barttorvik.com/trank.htm if you really wanted to worry about it. They show Arizona with an OR% of 31.4% which would rank them at about #167 of the 351 D1 teams.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

KaibabKat wrote:
Olsondogg wrote:Ok, so when I hear about offense, tell me the numbers that support the "Arizona struggles offensively" or "Arizona is not efficient".
Well, you could go here: http://www.barttorvik.com/trank.htm if you really wanted to worry about it. They show Arizona with an OR% of 31.4% which would rank them at about #167 of the 351 D1 teams.

I could go to random sites to find something negative. KenPom is pretty damn accurate, however. Also, I can get a good look at a T-bone by sticking my head up a bull's ass, but I'd rather take a butcher's word for it.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
WildcatStunner
Posts: 3463
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 1:07 am
Reputation: 119

Re: AdjO

Post by WildcatStunner »

What is the thing that Kenpom shows? Every team that has won it all was top 20 in adjO and adjD? Did Uconn buck that trend?
User avatar
KaibabKat
Posts: 1841
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 215

Re: AdjO

Post by KaibabKat »

WildcatStunner wrote:What is the thing that Kenpom shows? AdjO, AdjD and a bunch of other stuff. Every team that has won it all was top 20 in adjO and adjD? Yes, since at least 2003 until last year. Did Uconn buck that trend? Yes, they won it with an AdjO of 39.
User avatar
gumby
Posts: 6821
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:18 pm
Reputation: 1

Re: AdjO

Post by gumby »

So we have a chance. I can stop thinking about next year.
Right where I want to be.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: AdjO

Post by Olsondogg »

So, after tonight our AdjO sits at 13.

Our AdjD sits at 10.

Two other teams in the nation have both that reside in the top 15 like Arizona. Those teams are Kentucky and Virginia.



Feel free to repeat this to someone that complains about offense or defense.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Post Reply