Re: Larry Scott
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 11:07 am
So HBO wanted Arizona but had to settle for Notre Dame?
Ok
Ok
You may want to get an update to your eyeglass prescription.MrBug708 wrote:So HBO wanted Arizona but had to settle for Notre Dame?
Ok
I thought it sounded like Arizona didn't apply for "The Drive" because the HBO thing was already in the works.ChooChooCat wrote:The logic is Arizona told the Pac-12 Network to kick rocks when offered to do the Drive, so now the Pac-12 can repay Arizona with a middle finger in return.azcat49 wrote:So the conference is not ok with another marque team? It only works if it is UCLA or USC?
Sure we would get a boost in recruiting but Oregon doesn't get one in there relationship with Nike? USC with the entertainment industry?
They should have let us do it but had us share the revenue with the conference. I really don't understand the logic
Pascoe has all the details here. We do get $3.8 million overall ($2.3 million average for gear). Miller and Rich Rod get $200K a year from Nike, we get 13% royalties, and a bunch of other details.Merkin wrote:What? Same $$$ as ntOSU and less than Utah? And no money to coaches?
http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/blo ... um=twitter
A new contract with Nike has put the University of Arizona on par with other schools in the Pac-12.
The university and the sportswear giant in March signed a 10-year extension, the longest of any in the Portland Business Journal's database of apparel deals.
Nike provided the university $1 million in equipment and apparel last year, the lowest of the 10 public universities in the conference.
The new deal increases that to $2.2 million, putting it on par with Oregon State ($2.2 million) and just below Utah ($2.4 million).
Over 10 years, the university will get $23.3 million in equipment and apparel from Nike.
Unlike most, the deal does not provide cash payments to the university.
Such payments often go to head coaches of football and basketball teams, such as Under Armour's deal with the University of South Carolina that includes $750,000 for football coach Steve Spurrier.
The competition to outfit top college athletic programs has never been more intense.
Arizona joins a list of universities that recently signed significantly bigger extensions, including Indiana, the University of Cincinnati, Arizona State University, Michigan, Texas A&M, Georgia, Kentucky, the University of Florida and Florida State.
University deals are coveted by sportswear companies because of the access to loyal and upwardly mobile students who can become lifelong consumers and buy numerous types of branded products like shoes, T-shirts, hoodies and hats.
ChooChooCat wrote:The logic is Arizona told the Pac-12 Network to kick rocks when offered to do the Drive, so now the Pac-12 can repay Arizona with a middle finger in return.azcat49 wrote:So the conference is not ok with another marque team? It only works if it is UCLA or USC?
Sure we would get a boost in recruiting but Oregon doesn't get one in there relationship with Nike? USC with the entertainment industry?
They should have let us do it but had us share the revenue with the conference. I really don't understand the logic
Wrong.MrBug708 wrote:So HBO wanted Arizona but had to settle for Notre Dame?
Ok
Why did the Pac12 do this?Machina wrote:I get why the PAC12 did this but it really sucks. I bet they would have done this for every team except Oregon and USC. Even then they probably would have done this for them.
Hopefully something can be worked out for next year with U of A and HBO
Im on board with the firing nowSAN FRANCISCO -- Turning college basketball into a one-semester sport is an idea that the game's decision-makers should consider, Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott proposed Thursday.
"I think that's an intriguing concept that we absolutely ought to explore," Scott said during the conference's media day event.
He added that he doesn't want to diminish the mass appeal of March Madness at the conclusion of the season, but he said that a one-semester college basketball season would create advantages for the game and help the sport avoid the "overlap" that unfolds each fall.
He mentioned that "overlap can be a challenge," with college basketball's start intersecting with the MLB playoffs, NFL, NBA, NFL and college football.
"As part of that consideration, we have to realize that March Madness is something very unique," Scott said. "I do love the idea of making college basketball a one-semester sport, a little bit more compact. That all makes sense on a lot of levels. I think the balance of that is what would it do to the way the college basketball season ends?"
Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany also acknowledged preliminary discussions about a new-look college hoops calendar, but he saw potential conflicts with other events and the NCAA's television partners as a likely obstacle to change.
"Can we move it into a middle of December start time?" Delany asked. "If you pick up a month there, you're talking about a month on the back end. You're talking about competition with NBA playoffs. You're talking about the start of the baseball season. You're talking about conflicts with [The Masters]. ... I don't think it's an easy answer at all."
Scott said the recent rule changes, including the new 30-second shot clock in men's basketball, should also affect the game's national following.
"I'm completely supportive and have been pushing for the rule changes," he said. "A more free-flowing game that creates more balance between offense and defense -- I think that will be more positive for college basketball and its overall popularity."
Larry can only say so much publiclly and it is more of a conference problem. College basketball is the 8th most popular sport in the US. Moving the season can help with that.Chicat wrote:So the timing of the season needs some kind of drastic change but refereeing is just fine and dandy? Thanks for keeping your eye on the prize Larry.
Oh, ok.PHXCATS wrote:Larry can only say so much publiclly and it is more of a conference problem. College basketball is the 8th most popular sport in the US. Moving the season can help with that.Chicat wrote:So the timing of the season needs some kind of drastic change but refereeing is just fine and dandy? Thanks for keeping your eye on the prize Larry.
While the PAC 12 refs suck I don't think it really impacts things too much as far as who wins and loses games.
Besides vs Ucla 2013 PAC 12 tournament what games come to mind for youChicat wrote:Oh, ok.PHXCATS wrote:Larry can only say so much publiclly and it is more of a conference problem. College basketball is the 8th most popular sport in the US. Moving the season can help with that.Chicat wrote:So the timing of the season needs some kind of drastic change but refereeing is just fine and dandy? Thanks for keeping your eye on the prize Larry.
While the PAC 12 refs suck I don't think it really impacts things too much as far as who wins and loses games.
UofA vs Wisconsin 2014 with the no call on nick Johnson at the end.PHXCATS wrote:Besides vs Ucla 2013 PAC 12 tournament what games come to mind for youChicat wrote:Oh, ok.PHXCATS wrote:Larry can only say so much publiclly and it is more of a conference problem. College basketball is the 8th most popular sport in the US. Moving the season can help with that.Chicat wrote:So the timing of the season needs some kind of drastic change but refereeing is just fine and dandy? Thanks for keeping your eye on the prize Larry.
While the PAC 12 refs suck I don't think it really impacts things too much as far as who wins and loses games.
Watch every game buddy. I would watch everyone if it shifts a month one way or the other. To say you favor a shift means you aren't a true fan is one of the dumbest things I have read here and there are tons of dumb posts.CalStateTempe wrote:UofA vs Wisconsin 2014 with the no call on nick Johnson at the end.PHXCATS wrote:Besides vs Ucla 2013 PAC 12 tournament what games come to mind for youChicat wrote:Oh, ok.PHXCATS wrote:Larry can only say so much publiclly and it is more of a conference problem. College basketball is the 8th most popular sport in the US. Moving the season can help with that.Chicat wrote:So the timing of the season needs some kind of drastic change but refereeing is just fine and dandy? Thanks for keeping your eye on the prize Larry.
While the PAC 12 refs suck I don't think it really impacts things too much as far as who wins and loses games.
You must not watch much UofA bb during the confernece season. I doubt a "schedule shift" would change that for you. It's cool, we all have priorities.
Frankly I give two shits about the NBA and the NFL playoffs (in general). But I don't miss a UofA bb game and enjoy watching marquee games from other conferences in season.
Move the season from two quarters with the potential of three for a deep ncaa run to two no matter what.84Cat wrote:What about schools on the quarter system? Larry shows his ignorance. It is so embarrassing that this guy represents our conference!
Better exposure for a sport I really enjoy. Better focus of the players both academicly and when playing basketball. More money for U of A with better TV deals. Personally more time for the NFL and college football.CalStateTempe wrote:Again I really don't see how a shift helps with popularity.
College bb starts at the perfect time, mlb is ending, nfl is winding down, it ramps up in January and peaks in march just before the start of baseball and the end of the nba season.
Since your carrying Scott's water on the matter, why would you be in favor of a shift as a way to grow popularity in something that is generally a niche sport?
One semester would mean the season starts in January and runs through June and into July right? It would be really nice to be able to sit inside during the summer and watch bball as June/July/August are boring months for sports, for me at least.PHXCATS wrote:You want to fire him because he makes a lot of sense? Lots of people, not us diehards, only care about college basketball after the super bowl. It makes a ton of sense to me. Who cares if March Madness turns into April whatever name you want to call it
Hey!! here's an idea!!ASUHATER! wrote:If the season started early January then the tournament would be early mid may to maybe early June.
Exactly.pc in NM wrote:Hey!! here's an idea!!ASUHATER! wrote:If the season started early January then the tournament would be early mid may to maybe early June.
Let's schedule the NCAA's against the NBA playoffs!!
Trust me - I created the Pac-12 Network....
CBB becomes more popular -> More people become Arizona fans -> Arizona gets more money -> Arizona stays successful.CalStateTempe wrote:I don't need college basketball to "become more popular" to affect my passion, love, and following of the sport.
The set up is perfect. 2 weeks of exhibition/easy games. A thanksgiving week tournament. 4s weeks non confernece, 8 weeks conference, 1 week confernece championship, and then march madness. I say this as an arizona fan and having lived on Tobacco Road.
Even shifting it a month would be seriously problematic, especially for the other sport competition at the end of April and early may.
This move should seriously upset any true UofA fan.
Larry Scott can pound sand. Shifting the calender would cause the sport to lose popularity, not gain, IMNSHO.
Actually no. College bball is the least popular it's been in decades. Ratings for the tournament and final four are way lower than the 80s and 90s and no one watches games before early February. From a national popularity standpoint...college bball is circling the drain.azcat49 wrote:Larry Scott is an absolute F ing idiot. College bball has never been more popular. Basketball in itself is probably along with soccer the biggest game internationally.
One thing about his idea though, he wouldn't have to deal as much with AZ fans calling him stupid, corrupt and just plain useless.
You actually have no idea what you are talking about.ASUHATER! wrote:Actually no. College bball is the least popular it's been in decades. Ratings for the tournament and final four are way lower than the 80s and 90s and no one watches games before early February. From a national popularity standpoint...college bball is circling the drain.azcat49 wrote:Larry Scott is an absolute F ing idiot. College bball has never been more popular. Basketball in itself is probably along with soccer the biggest game internationally.
One thing about his idea though, he wouldn't have to deal as much with AZ fans calling him stupid, corrupt and just plain useless.
Uh ok.ASUHATER! wrote:I agree you're being an ass for no reason since you're wrong.
Move to China, apparently you can watch all you want there.Alieberman wrote:So glad I added the Pac 12 channel and all the AZ games are on fox sports 1, which I don't have
Fuck you Larry