Hot/Not Bubble: #65 Paulina Gretzky vs. #70 Sharon Stone

[JMarkJohns]

Who ya got?





vs.





Open until next Wednesday.

[azcat49]

Sharon Stone for me. Of course I am thinking about in your prime I am as sultry as they get cross my legs Sharon Stone

[JMarkJohns]

Stone was incredible when younger. Way hotter than fish faced Gretzky spawn...

[Alieberman]

Stone was incredible when younger. Way hotter than fish faced Gretzky spawn...

This exactly.

You have to think about Stone in her prime.... so hot.

[Longhorned]

[Merkin]

Stone was incredible when younger. Way hotter than fish faced Gretzky spawn...

QFT. This is the easiest one yet.

[77HoyaCat4Ever]

Easy for me

Stone incredibly hot when younger, still hot considering her age (and I'm creeping up there)

Gretzky is a Buttaface

[77HoyaCat4Ever]

Sharon Stone should snatch this victory handily

[JMarkJohns]

I'm very pleased with this poll result thus far!

[JMarkJohns]

Bump

[gumby]

When she was married to the SF Chronicle editor, a friend said she would come in and give them all ... cookies.

[Puerco]

Gif or gtfo.

[Merkin]

Video of the whole scene.

http://video.wikia.com/wiki/File:Basic_ ... _Leg_Cross

[JMarkJohns]

Final 30 hours of voting, though it'd take an comeback for the ages!

[NYCat]

Guess you have to be old(er) to appreciate Sharon Stone, that scene does nothing for me. It's very tame by today's standards and sure Gretzky isn't perfect but better then Stone.

[Reydituto]

Guess you have to be old(er) to appreciate Sharon Stone, that scene does nothing for me. It's very tame by today's standards and sure Gretzky isn't perfect but better then Stone.

No.

You have to like women to appreciate Sharon Stone.

The reason that scene seems "tame" by today's standards (it really isn't tame, but that's another argument) is because it was in a movie 25 years ago, was a trend-setting scene and was truly controversial at the time because it was pushing the boundaries of that time. The more graphic nudity and content now readily available in movies is largely due to that very scene, and as such most of us are jaded to the impact of that very scene as well as that type of nudity. Doesn't seem like a big deal now, but it really was then.

I like Paulina Gretzky, voted "Hot" on both, but IMO the result of this vote was predictable and is entirely justified.

[NYCat]

That's my point, you had to be around at that time to appreciate it, I was a little kid then. I watched it later and didn't have the same impact, I was already desensitized to it.

[Reydituto]

That's my point, you had to be around at that time to appreciate it, I was a little kid then. I watched it later and didn't have the same impact, I was already desensitized to it.

Appreciating the history should allow one to overcome being jaded or "desensitized" though ... Besides, that's just one (very influential mind you) movie scene, that's not the only reason she's hot, and her "body" of work is more impressive and goes beyond just that "moment" ... you don't have to be a geezer or a contemporary of theirs to appreciate Esther Williams or Sophia Loren or Marilyn Monroe ... You think Paulina Gretzky is hotter, fine, different strokes, I'm just not buying any of the other justifications you offer up for why Sharon Stone is somehow not hot, less hot, or otherwise diminished.

[PieceOfMeat]

Guess you have to be old(er) to appreciate Sharon Stone, that scene does nothing for me. It's very tame by today's standards and sure Gretzky isn't perfect but better then Stone.

I'm interested, when you say better than Stone....what criteria are you using? Prime hotness? Current level of hotness (and lets face it, Stone is in her mid 50s now)? or what?

Cause, no offense to ms gretzky, but if comparing prime to prime, to me there's no way gretzky's face can ever match up to stone's.