I find it strange that the government actually acknowledging ET technology as a possible explanation isn't more of a hot topic anywhere.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... LVfwmm8ROs
https://thedebrief.org/fast-movers-and- ... Zj1jUi4PxQ
UAP's
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Re: UAP's
Yeah almost assuredly not anything extraterrestrial. Just as always is probably some top secret experimental 15 years away from actual deployment fancy future drone or airplane technology.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
Re: UAP's
Maybe the airline pilot one that reportedly was missile-like, but I doubt it on the one's encountered by military pilots.
I'm pretty sure that the top secret experimenters could have and would have restricted Navy pilots from investigating it.
Re: UAP's
Take Roswell, for example. What I find most striking isn't people who were there like Jesse Marcels who have claimed the government story was bullshit, but the description of some of the debris, like the memory metal. A foil like material that couldn't be cut and once crumpled would unfold without a crease.
How do you come up with something like that if not true?
Then you have the fire in the sky incident. Of course the movie was mostly BS, but 7 dudes all told the same story and all but one passed a polygraph and he didn't fail, it was just inconclusive. Polygraphs aren't ultra reliable but you would think at least one would have failed if it was concocted.
How do you come up with something like that if not true?
Then you have the fire in the sky incident. Of course the movie was mostly BS, but 7 dudes all told the same story and all but one passed a polygraph and he didn't fail, it was just inconclusive. Polygraphs aren't ultra reliable but you would think at least one would have failed if it was concocted.