I get all fired up about the argument that lack of Final Fours shows some limitation in Miller too, though.Longhorned wrote:Yeah, this year's team has no bearing on Miller's trajectory. I have no disagreement on that. What I'm saying is that time is running out when it comes to a true deep tourney run. Hell, time is running out, period. How long can any head coach be expected to stay with a single program nowadays? And Arizona fans share something in common with college basketball fans more generally (not including me): A disproportionate emphasis on Final Fours and national titles. It's central to college basketball, regardless of any arguments for the greater importance of consistent winning and success in all the other parts of the equation.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I could not disagree more that time is running out.Longhorned wrote:I don't give Miller a pass. I hope Miller doesn't give Miller a pass. It generally takes a long time for coaches to break through, Miller is young, and a lot of fans don't want Arizona and Miller to be separate from one another when he breaks through. But this is Arizona, and breaking through to the Final Four needs to happen, and time is running out. If next year's team can't break a zone, and a lesser team runs circles around them in the shallow rounds of the tourney, then the pattern of limitations will have become unsustainable.
Everyone thought this team would be weak. Local media mentioned 0-18 in Pac. Now we're mad because we aren't dominant?
Pulling a top 5 class out of the FBI debacle is a borderline miracle. A replacement for Miller isn't doing that.
We sort of deserve to be UCLA if we ignore the good Miller does. Look at that program and how often they hire blah coaches, and we assume we'll automatically do better.
Coaches are not perfect, but every potential Milller replacement is..until he's here. Then, we'll have our very own Steve Alford. Alford is such a great comparison point for Miller. For people who think Miller has coaching limitations, Alford/Miller recruited pretty similar. Who got more results?
Jamelle Horne missed by 4 inches or we're not having a conversation about limitations. Was it Miller's limitations that caused the shot to go long?
Wisky had the best offensive half in tournament history in 14-15. Does that show a limitation in Miller?
We had a shot to move on to the FF in 13-14 despite a lights out game from Kaminsky. Or if the refs don't call a charge, Rondae tips it in and we move on. Are those limitations?
Any of those 3 things break differently and there's no limitations talk. I get that may not matter to the fan psyche, but it does. Miller's limitations are almost entirely dependent on some things in those games going wrong.
Hell, if Ashley doesn't break his foot, I genuinely believe we are speaking about a coach with an undefeated season and national title under his belt. And we are not talking about his limitations.