Game 8, vs Washington St. (2015)

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 pm

Gladiator Cat wrote:Calstate, JR has really improved. He has played well today.

I can see why he was so highly rated out of HS. Higher than Mariotta, Luck and ???

Main Event · Post by **Main Event** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 pm

Look at that boy JR

AZarchery · Post by **AZarchery** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 pm

Time to start Randall

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 pm

Jones!

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 pm

Skowran is the king of onsides!

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 pm

nice throw, nice catch

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 pm

JJJ! TD!

dirtbags · Post by **dirtbags** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:25 pm

randall is amazing today. imagine if we didn't have those bad snaps

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:25 pm

dirtbags wrote:randall is amazing today. imagine if we didn't have those bad snaps

or the turnover on the return

cordera89 · Post by **cordera89** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:26 pm

Now onside kick

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:26 pm

damn, we dont get the onside

AZCatGirl · Post by **AZCatGirl** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:26 pm

Getting our hopes up and then the let down...

Gladiator Cat · Post by **Gladiator Cat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:26 pm

Seriously, JR has to be considered for a starting position and RR knows it.

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:26 pm

dirtbags wrote:randall is amazing today. imagine if we didn't have those bad snaps

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:26 pm

UA player closest to the ball was held

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:27 pm

That should've been holding on 8

michcat · Post by **michcat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:27 pm

Looks like we have a new center.

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:27 pm

Bleh. Everyone figured the score would be like this. Just ended up on the wrong side.

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:27 pm

Merkin wrote:UA player closest to the ball was held

Absolutely

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:27 pm

Basically turned out how I thought....except the W. I think my prediction was 45-42 Arizona

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:28 pm

Gladiator Cat wrote:Calstate, JR has really improved. He has played well today.

That's great you could really see the improvement over the last few games since he's been taking the first team reps.

Did anu get pulled again ?

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:28 pm

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:28 pm

Merkin wrote:UA player closest to the ball was held

is that even a penalty that's callable on an onside kick?

AZarchery · Post by **AZarchery** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:28 pm

Why are we so far off the ball on defense?

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:28 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:
Gladiator Cat wrote:Calstate, JR has really improved. He has played well today.
That's great you could really see the improvement over the last few games since he's been taking the first team reps.

Did anu get pulled again ?

Yup

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:28 pm

there's the game. damn turnover.

dirtbags · Post by **dirtbags** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:29 pm

yeah, anu got yanked

Gladiator Cat · Post by **Gladiator Cat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:29 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:
Gladiator Cat wrote:Calstate, JR has really improved. He has played well today.
That's great you could really see the improvement over the last few games since he's been taking the first team reps.

Did anu get pulled again ?

Yes, and I don't think it was because of injury.

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:29 pm

Still a 3 man line

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:29 pm

;aoer ]
sagl[riep]ear]p9 r

cordera89 · Post by **cordera89** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:29 pm

Well that game. they fought back hard but defense didn't help, And I guess it time to start randall

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:30 pm

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:30 pm

michcat wrote:Looks like we have a new center.

Bundage really needs to go back to the line.

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:30 pm

3goggles wrote:Still a 3 man line

This is why a person should not be wedded to a system. In/outside football.

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:31 pm

How the hell do you line up in a 3 man front?

Gladiator Cat · Post by **Gladiator Cat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:31 pm

May be time for old Karliwek to think about retirement.

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:31 pm

That defensive effort was wow.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:32 pm

If we are running the 3-3-5 next year, I'll just totally ignore football altogether. I'm not one to subject myself to watching a good team lose winnable games because someone mistakenly thinks a gimmick defense will someday actually work.

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:32 pm

*sigh* 45-42 'Cougs. UGH.

dirtbags · Post by **dirtbags** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:32 pm

yeah, so many lapses on D. again.

AZarchery · Post by **AZarchery** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:33 pm

I can't wait to see an entire game of no bundage at center

Gladiator Cat · Post by **Gladiator Cat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:35 pm

AZarckery, in truth its on the coaches, not Bundage.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:36 pm

Chicat wrote:If we are running the 3-3-5 next year, I'll just totally ignore football altogether. I'm not one to subject myself to watching a good team lose winnable games because someone mistakenly thinks a gimmick defense will someday actually work.

I was defending the defense and casteel a long time... But I agree. We need a real defense

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:36 pm

Chicat wrote:If we are running the 3-3-5 next year, I'll just totally ignore football altogether. I'm not one to subject myself to watching a good team lose winnable games because someone mistakenly thinks a gimmick defense will someday actually work.

I'm kind of there too at this point, but for me the more damning thing is the 4th down situation late in the game, or that final 3rd down, our defensive front is set up to lose. You're not putting the players in the best possible position to win. It's embarrassing.

michcat · Post by **michcat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:36 pm

Gladiator Cat wrote:AZarckery, in truth its on the coaches, not Bundage.

You're right. Bondage should never been in there with his past fuck ups.

cordera89 · Post by **cordera89** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:44 pm

Chicat wrote:If we are running the 3-3-5 next year, I'll just totally ignore football altogether. I'm not one to subject myself to watching a good team lose winnable games because someone mistakenly thinks a gimmick defense will someday actually work.

Saying that is basically saying we as fan have no faith in the scheme. I mean we were playing against a team that pass the ball 100% of the time and are defense is riddle with injury and were mostly playing with inexperience guys that had to step up. But when I all set in done what could we really do in this situation. RR isn't going to make defensive staff change anytime soon. Casteel isn't going to change how he prepared it.

TuiTouchdown · Post by **TuiTouchdown** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:50 pm

cordera89 wrote:
Chicat wrote:If we are running the 3-3-5 next year, I'll just totally ignore football altogether. I'm not one to subject myself to watching a good team lose winnable games because someone mistakenly thinks a gimmick defense will someday actually work.
Saying that is basically saying we as fan have no faith in the scheme. I mean we were playing against a team that pass the ball 100% of the time and are defense is riddle with injury and were mostly playing with inexperience guys that had to step up. But when I all set in done what could we really do in this situation. RR isn't going to make defensive staff change anytime soon. Casteel isn't going to change how he prepared it.

I think we're all very disappointed with how the season has went so far. But there's no way we're going to change anything up. We're really green at the DB position, which made them sitting ducks for WSU today. Our LB depth is absolutely shredded. This year just wasn't our year to repeat as South champs. Next year, we'll be better.

cordera89 · Post by **cordera89** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:54 pm

TuiTouchdown wrote:
cordera89 wrote:
Chicat wrote:If we are running the 3-3-5 next year, I'll just totally ignore football altogether. I'm not one to subject myself to watching a good team lose winnable games because someone mistakenly thinks a gimmick defense will someday actually work.
Saying that is basically saying we as fan have no faith in the scheme. I mean we were playing against a team that pass the ball 100% of the time and are defense is riddle with injury and were mostly playing with inexperience guys that had to step up. But when I all set in done what could we really do in this situation. RR isn't going to make defensive staff change anytime soon. Casteel isn't going to change how he prepared it.
I think we're all very disappointed with how the season has went so far. But there's no way we're going to change anything up. We're really green at the DB position, which made them sitting ducks for WSU today. Our LB depth is absolutely shredded. This year just wasn't our year to repeat as South champs. Next year, we'll be better.

It not that, playing 12 week without bye and playing injury free. Kind of expect something of this magnitude was going to happen.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 6:08 pm

cordera89 wrote:
Chicat wrote:If we are running the 3-3-5 next year, I'll just totally ignore football altogether. I'm not one to subject myself to watching a good team lose winnable games because someone mistakenly thinks a gimmick defense will someday actually work.
Saying that is basically saying we as fan have no faith in the scheme. I mean we were playing against a team that pass the ball 100% of the time and are defense is riddle with injury and were mostly playing with inexperience guys that had to step up. But when I all set in done what could we really do in this situation. RR isn't going to make defensive staff change anytime soon. Casteel isn't going to change how he prepared it.

I have no faith in the scheme. Doesn't stop the run. Doesn't stop the pass. If Casteel can't recognize that his scheme sucks donkey balls, then maybe he shouldn't be coaching major college football.

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 24, 2015 6:13 pm

cordera89 wrote: Saying that is basically saying we as fan have no faith in the scheme

No we don't. I fully understand the injury situation, but you can't drop 8 guys back in coverage and still leave the middle of the field wide open.

Login • Register