ChooChooCat wrote:I must have missed R&F's demands that Miller "evolve" after the thirteen games we've won so far this season. Can anyone point me to those posts?
Are we puffing up our chests about our #94 SOS here? Is that what we're doing. Um ok. We would have lost to SANTA CLARA if they didn't brick 2 gift FTs at the last second of the game.
Chicat wrote:How are we not still bitching about Miller being a crap offensive coach? I mean we've scored over 80 points 7 games in a row now. Unacceptable! When is Miller going to adapt?
-Credit Miller for doing whatever he did with York individually to improve his 3-point shooting AMAZING
-Credit Miller for recruiting some players that are more offensivey-oriented (Allen, Trier) to replace a few lottery pick defenders RHJ and Gordon 2 yrs ago. RHJ and Gordon are still massive shoes to fill but lets be honest they didn't have jumpshots that scared anybody and mostly relied on elite athleticism to score.
-Credit a shorter shot clock for forcing us to play more uptempo than in past seasons with the longer clock. We have great athletes that can run for the most part, a higher tempo game suits them. Trier and Allen are pretty damn solid on the fast break you know.
catgrad97 wrote:It's called the pack line, not straightforward man, moron.
It involves help recovery, and players are supposed to switch off screens, not defend whoever's closest. How long have you been watching this team?
And this is the second of two ridiculously stupid, reactionary posts by you today--thanks to your copy-and-paste approach to a non-point.
The point is having a kamikaze-pilot like dedication to one flavor of defense (out of dozens at our disposal) puts any team at a strategic disadvantage time and time again. This is something mediocre opposing coaches exploit very easily. Case in point: the last shot vs UCLA where our 7-footer must (according to the defensive scheme) leave the area of the court where he is naturally most effective (the paint) because his man is setting a high ball screen for that very reason. You know one way to completely eliminate the possibility of the 7-footer switching onto Bryce Alford out at the 3-point line? Keep his 7-foot ass in the paint where it belongs and let the guards and wings guard the perimeter. Oh no-no, that would require zone principles, which is outside our comfort zone. A box-1 would be one (of many) option(s). That would put extra attention on Alford since everyone in the entire western U.S. knew Alford was going to shoot a 3. Or did you not know that, moron.
No, do what we do. The players didn't try hard enough. The players are the worst defensively since ever! That doesn't seem like a very fair performance appraisal to me, but that's what we do, trash players and rarely take any responsibility for the coaches
Ever stop to think that when freak athlete defenders such as RHJ and Gordon are replaced with more offensively-oriented players like Trier and Allen that perhaps the same cookie-cutter defense might not suit the new group of players as well? Every think of molding the defense to what players you have to work with, instead of expecting Tollefson to be the new RHJ? (lol at that thought!)
Nah, can't be. Do what we do. Tollefson, you need to perform like RHJ did or we're just going to plain suck on defense. Sorry if you can't hack it, that's your problem. Not enough nastiness
Jordan Brownridge is single-handedly torching us for 44 points? Sorry Elliott, you didn't have enough nastiness and there's no way to help you out. Do what we do! FYI Brownridge's has only scored more than 30 points once since then....hmmmm