catgrad97 wrote:I fully expect to see Damon Stoudamire and Richard Jefferson on the Deuce before this decade is out. Luke Walton too, if his dad can ever let go.
Is Sean Elliott on Fox Sports only?
I am with you on everything but Damon. I love Mighty Mouse, but his skills do not translate into speaking in front of the camera.
If we want to look far out into the future, Gordon and Solomon would be naturals... Ashley, too - if he couod gain some more name recognition playing the game. BAsh is soft-spoken, but articulate as can be.
Could kind of get the sense who his favorite is. Interesting he said it is going the distance and he is going to probably wait to see who declares when he would start and star for any team in the country.
rgdeuce wrote:Could kind of get the sense who his favorite is. Interesting he said it is going the distance and he is going to probably wait to see who declares when he would start and star for any team in the country.
MSU fans will interpret that as confirmation of him wanting to see their roster availability first.
RS gonna need time to shake off that rust and build confidence in that knee back up. As time progresses, we will see. We will also see how well LM and RS defend too
rgdeuce wrote:RS gonna need time to shake off that rust and build confidence in that knee back up. As time progresses, we will see. We will also see how well LM and RS defend too
My hope for Ray (if he doesn't die) would be essentially what we saw from Dillon Brooks the other day. He's got the size and skill set to be a matchup nightmare for 4's if he can hold his own defensively
rgdeuce wrote:RS gonna need time to shake off that rust and build confidence in that knee back up. As time progresses, we will see. We will also see how well LM and RS defend too
This. I don't see why a natural 3 coming off a long period of inactivity would immediately start at the 4. Let him have time and the rotation will shake its way out.
What's interesting is that LM isn't ranked by US recruiting sites (Rivals, ESPN, etc.). If he were, I don't know how highly he'd be ranked. But if he's as good as CSM and others are saying, he'd probably be ranked at least in the top 20, if not higher, which would mean our *current* recruiting class (sans JJ) is already in the top 10.
Beachcat97 wrote:What's interesting is that LM isn't ranked by US recruiting sites (Rivals, ESPN, etc.). If he were, I don't know how highly he'd be ranked. But if he's as good as CSM and others are saying, he'd probably be ranked at least in the top 20, if not higher, which would mean our *current* recruiting class (sans JJ) is already in the top 10.
Scout has Lauri as a 5 star prospect, which pretty much means he's a top 25 player in the class.
rgdeuce wrote:Could kind of get the sense who his favorite is. Interesting he said it is going the distance and he is going to probably wait to see who declares when he would start and star for any team in the country.
He's more concerned with who he will be playing with. If he's going to play college ball he wants to win.
Beachcat97 wrote:What's interesting is that LM isn't ranked by US recruiting sites (Rivals, ESPN, etc.). If he were, I don't know how highly he'd be ranked. But if he's as good as CSM and others are saying, he'd probably be ranked at least in the top 20, if not higher, which would mean our *current* recruiting class (sans JJ) is already in the top 10.
Scout has Lauri as a 5 star prospect, which pretty much means he's a top 25 player in the class.
I hadn't seen Scout. Thanks. So we're looking at 3 top 25 recruits, plus whatever else CSM has up his sleeve.
Beachcat97 wrote:What's interesting is that LM isn't ranked by US recruiting sites (Rivals, ESPN, etc.). If he were, I don't know how highly he'd be ranked. But if he's as good as CSM and others are saying, he'd probably be ranked at least in the top 20, if not higher, which would mean our *current* recruiting class (sans JJ) is already in the top 10.
Scout has Lauri as a 5 star prospect, which pretty much means he's a top 25 player in the class.
Players who have played only in Europe generally do not get ranked. Jakob Poetyl (spell check pelase) is a good example of a very highly regarded kid who did not get ranked vs US prospects.
Beachcat97 wrote:What's interesting is that LM isn't ranked by US recruiting sites (Rivals, ESPN, etc.). If he were, I don't know how highly he'd be ranked. But if he's as good as CSM and others are saying, he'd probably be ranked at least in the top 20, if not higher, which would mean our *current* recruiting class (sans JJ) is already in the top 10.
Scout has Lauri as a 5 star prospect, which pretty much means he's a top 25 player in the class.
Players who have played only in Europe generally do not get ranked. Jakob Poetyl (spell check pelase) is a good example of a very highly regarded kid who did not get ranked vs US prospects.
Yep, but they will still give them an arbitrary star ranking based on their skill level.
Lol so Kansas magically leapfrogged both Arizona and MSU because Arizona is now the apparent favorite to land Alkins, a guy who Jackson can play along side with, ok...
ChooChooCat wrote:Lol so Kansas magically leapfrogged both Arizona and MSU because Arizona is now the apparent favorite to land Alkins, a guy who Jackson can play along side with, ok...
ChooChooCat wrote:Lol so Kansas magically leapfrogged both Arizona and MSU because Arizona is now the apparent favorite to land Alkins, a guy who Jackson can play along side with, ok...
If Josh cares about my feelings, he'll commit to Arizona right now so I can stop worrying.
ChooChooCat wrote:Lol so Kansas magically leapfrogged both Arizona and MSU because Arizona is now the apparent favorite to land Alkins, a guy who Jackson can play along side with, ok...
One person's unjustified bullshit is another person's "content."
And if they can sell that bullshit...I mean "content", more power to em.
With both JJ and Rawle both these guys can realistically share the immense benefit of a probable FF and very possible NC. It's hard to see any way getting Rawle, if we do, can do anything but benefit JJ; and the special national visibility would translate to more $s later in the League for both.
But hey, who cares about the future bucks potential?
I hope we fans don't underestimate Rawle. Unless my eyes are suddenly failing I see him as near-Julius Randle copy potential. And the skillset seems to be nearly in place already. Would any of you guys care to try to cover him once he hits a lane?