lets talk '16

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:42 pm

He opened it up because his grandma passed away, hence why Baylor is trending.

Beachcat97 · Post by **Beachcat97** » Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:31 pm

What a crazy recruiting year. It seems we've usually had one big fish left to reel in this time of year, but I can't remember a year when CSM has had so many possibilities hanging in the balance this deep in the recruiting cycle. No idea how our final '16 class is going to look.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:01 pm

Ferguson is a Zach LaVine type. I would take him over Alkins, but JJ is still the big one.

Beachcat97 · Post by **Beachcat97** » Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:51 pm

Is a class of KS, LM, and JJ the best class CSM has had at AZ?

PennZona20 · Post by **PennZona20** » Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:18 am

Zach Lavine still can't shoot as well as Ferguson can today. Ferguson can shoot like Trier. If you leave him open he's pretty auto from distance.

Lavine may be slightly bouncier but not by much.

And yes, in order of talent of guys on our radar it goes :

JJ
TF
RA

I don't think many would debate that.

EOCT · Post by **EOCT** » Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:40 am

No debate. Any one of them would define next year as elite, and two of them would be plainly sick.

Such an interesting negotiating challenge for Coach, talking with all three of them at the same time without mortally nicking anyone's ego. To that challenge I bow deeply to CSM.

Beachcat97 · Post by **Beachcat97** » Wed Mar 02, 2016 1:22 pm

If we end up with JJ plus either TF or RA, I'm fairly sure it'd be the best class CSM has ever had.

rgdeuce · Post by **rgdeuce** » Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:47 pm

We get just JJ out of that and its probably the best class Arizona has ever had. Simmons on Twitter pushin the Ferguson thing

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Thu Mar 03, 2016 6:23 am

rgdeuce wrote:We get just JJ out of that and its probably the best class Arizona has ever had. Simmons on Twitter pushin the Ferguson thing

Simmons is really starting to grow on me. He is like the Khalil Tate of basketball

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:06 pm

How many of our games coming down the stretch were on ESPN/ESPN2? And how many post game interviews have our guys done on Sportscenter? Wasn't that Gabe York I just saw talking to Neil Everett?

Josh, Rawle, Terrance . . . take note. When you come to Arizona you play on the big stage and you get every opportunity to shine.

84Cat · Post by **84Cat** » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:24 pm

Chicat wrote:How many of our games coming down the stretch were on ESPN/ESPN2? And how many post game interviews have our guys done on Sportscenter? Wasn't that Gabe York I just saw talking to Neil Everett?

Josh, Rawle, Terrance . . . take note. When you come to Arizona you play on the big stage and you get every opportunity to shine.

Bangkok Wildcat · Post by **Bangkok Wildcat** » Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:58 pm

Correct me if I'm wrong here.....but it looks like we have 6 open schollies to fill assuming Zo leaves and Pitts doesn't return. We have big shoes to fill with Zeus, Anderson and York leaving (Tolly not so much). See below and correct me if I'm wrong please:

Committed:
1. LM = hoping he's at least 2 years+
2. KS = OND (One And Done) ?

Pursuing:
3. JJ = OND, no doubt
4. RA = OND
5. TF = OND?
6. Senior Grad Transfer = same as a OND

So, if we pull off a huge recruiting class, work out a good chemistry, we could have a great 2016-17. But with all these OND's, also a possibility that Dusan leaves after his junior year (Europe?), also maybe a Ray Smith departure....we would need another huge / gigantic 2017 class to fill our needs.

Thoughts?

rgdeuce · Post by **rgdeuce** » Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:46 pm

The 2017 draft class is loaded. Supposed to be one of the top classes of the last 20 years. So JJ would be the only for sure. Which is why if Trier returns for his soph season, he may as well stick around til his junior year... I wouldnt sweat losing a lot of guys to the draft after next season. If Miller finished this class like we think, we'll be very strong the next two seasons

Bangkok Wildcat · Post by **Bangkok Wildcat** » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:16 am

rgdeuce wrote:The 2017 draft class is loaded. Supposed to be one of the top classes of the last 20 years. So JJ would be the only for sure. Which is why if Trier returns for his soph season, he may as well stick around til his junior year... I wouldnt sweat losing a lot of guys to the draft after next season. If Miller finished this class like we think, we'll be very strong the next two seasons

Interesting.......hope you are right rgdeuce, thanks.

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Sat Mar 05, 2016 10:14 am

Come on Ohio state beat Sparty with JJ in the building

EVCat · Post by **EVCat** » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:11 pm

Chicat wrote:How many of our games coming down the stretch were on ESPN/ESPN2? And how many post game interviews have our guys done on Sportscenter? Wasn't that Gabe York I just saw talking to Neil Everett?

Josh, Rawle, Terrance . . . take note. When you come to Arizona you play on the big stage and you get every opportunity to shine.

That was excellent. Though I winced when Gabe answered their "name the top 4 teams in the PAC other than Arizona?" question. He went by the book, but that is best answered with a "I can't do that" or a "you know, we have a really strong conference top to bottom which is what makes winning here so difficult" answer.

Main Event · Post by **Main Event** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:48 am

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:01 am

Main Event wrote:

And it would appear that we lead...

azcat34 · Post by **azcat34** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:06 am

FightWildcatsFight · Post by **FightWildcatsFight** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:09 am

Lots of people still hanging on to the notion that if we get Atkins then that means no JJ.

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:13 am

FightWildcatsFight wrote:Lots of people still hanging on to the notion that if we get Atkins then that means no JJ.

Which is stupid

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:14 am

Welcome to wildcat family Rawle!

Main Event · Post by **Main Event** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:14 am

If it really meant no JJ, Miller wouldn't be recruiting him. JJ is his guy.

rgdeuce · Post by **rgdeuce** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:28 am

Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.

azcat49 · Post by **azcat49** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:33 am

That is a crowded back court if Zo stays.

dcZONAfan · Post by **dcZONAfan** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:36 am

rgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.

Yeah, and if that's the case the Ferguson decommit really was perfect timing. Before we were salivating at the prospect of getting BOTH RA and JJ. Now it feels almost inevitable that we will get two more top 20 recruits, one way or another

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:37 am

This is the weirdest recruiting year ever.

Main Event · Post by **Main Event** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:40 am

rgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.

Sean supposedly wants all 3. Obviously convincing the 3rd guy would the hardest, but he's in fuck it i'm loading up mode right now

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:41 am

rgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.

If we are still alive with JJ, I don't know how we could squeeze in him and Ferguson. If Zo returns and we get Simon, we're 4 deep of McD's AA level guys on the wing plus Simon. I don't think Alkins influences JJ negatively, but unless Trier is gone, I don't see how it isn't him or Ferguson.

3goggles · Post by **3goggles** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:42 am

Spaceman Spiff wrote:This is the weirdest recruiting year ever.

True statement after the Leaf decommited people were losing there minds!

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:03 am

FightWildcatsFight wrote:Lots of people still hanging on to the notion that if we get Atkins then that means no JJ.

Pundits on Twitter says there is no relationship.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:11 am

Merkin wrote:
FightWildcatsFight wrote:Lots of people still hanging on to the notion that if we get Atkins then that means no JJ.
Pundits on Twitter says there is no relationship.

Yeah, multiple outlets are saying the same thing, so that must be what's coming from inside the program.

Just wondering if that's based on word from JJ's camp or just hopeful thinking.

rgdeuce · Post by **rgdeuce** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:18 am

Spaceman Spiff wrote:
rgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.
If we are still alive with JJ, I don't know how we could squeeze in him and Ferguson. If Zo returns and we get Simon, we're 4 deep of McD's AA level guys on the wing plus Simon. I don't think Alkins influences JJ negatively, but unless Trier is gone, I don't see how it isn't him or Ferguson.

That's how I see it too. And Miller may be all in for all three like some have said, but I'm sure Alkins is looking at it like we are. Ferguson too. It either tells me that Miller knows Trier is taking his shot at the next level no matter what, he is uncertain about landing JJ and/or Trier leaving and wants the backup plan in place before those decisions are made, or that absolutely no "F's" are given on his part. Even looking at it like this, in absolutes, guys playing the below define positions and not using the versatility we have to play a Kadeem off ball, or Zo at the 3 and Simon at the 2, Comanche at 4, etc.

C Ristic, Comanche
PF Lauri, Smith
SF JJ, Simon
SG Trier, Alkins
PG Kadeem, Simmons, PJC

Not sure where Ferguson fits into that equation. Two guys arent getting many minutes if he comes. Probably PJC and Simon, and even then, a 10 man rotation with that star power means a few reserves arent getting many minutes too. Obviously if JJ chooses Michigan State, Ferguson slides in fairly easily and we are still loaded. Same if Trier leaves.

pokinmik · Post by **pokinmik** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:22 am

Even if we only have 5 out of these 7 players at the 2,3,4 spots holy shit. Alkins, Trier, Ferguson, Jackson, Smith, Simon, Markannen. Have 6 of those, however likely or not, and I'll be in heaven for the next 12 months plus. Seems unlikely we could bring in Alkins, Ferguson, and Jackson without losing Trier. The freshman possibly coming in all bring some needed attitude too which is nice...I love what I see, as I'm sure everyone here does haha.

gronk4heisman · Post by **gronk4heisman** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:36 am

No one thinks that the timing of this is at all weird? Word was he was planning on waiting, and then the Monday after JJ's MSU official he decides he is announcing. Maybe I am a pessimist, but I do believe that the staff is doubtful they will get JJ after hearing things post visit and told Alkins such. Alkin's was probably reluctant to commit when JJ was likely because, although they play different positions it would be naive to think JJ would not effect Alkins minutes. I hope I am way off base here because I want JJ more than any recruit I can remember.

rgdeuce · Post by **rgdeuce** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:47 am

gronk4heisman wrote:No one thinks that the timing of this is at all weird? Word was he was planning on waiting, and then the Monday after JJ's MSU official he decides he is announcing. Maybe I am a pessimist, but I do believe that the staff is doubtful they will get JJ after hearing things post visit and told Alkins such. Alkin's was probably reluctant to commit when JJ was likely because, although they play different positions it would be naive to think JJ would not effect Alkins minutes. I hope I am way off base here because I want JJ more than any recruit I can remember.

I highly doubt an official visit to a school in Jackson's home state is going to change anything. This isn't a case of a guy coming from back east and saying, wow, the atmosphere in McKale is insane, the weather is gorgeous, the locker rooms and facilities are top of the line, and the women are beautiful. While Michigan State does have nice facilities, he has probably already been in that arena for a game, if not seen all of it before. Everything else he has experienced in his home state. What could Michigan State give him outside of a suitcase full of money to suddenly change his opinion or make it final?

This also completely ignores the one thing that has changed: Ferguson opened his recruiting up, Arizona is going after him and are in his top 5. Ferguson does play his position. I don't think Alkins was ever reluctant to come because of JJ. He knew JJ was in the mix before and after we shot to the top for him (at least from the opinions of many others). If that were the case, he would have to worry about Ferguson and Trier, and his buddy Simmons who is already here.

Main Event · Post by **Main Event** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:48 am

The Goat · Post by **The Goat** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:01 am

Markanen, Simmons, and Alkins. Swoon. Add Jackson and it turns into a cleanup time. Add Ferguson and well we all better go check our lease because we're living in fuck city.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:07 am

gronk4heisman wrote:No one thinks that the timing of this is at all weird? Word was he was planning on waiting, and then the Monday after JJ's MSU official he decides he is announcing. Maybe I am a pessimist, but I do believe that the staff is doubtful they will get JJ after hearing things post visit and told Alkins such. Alkin's was probably reluctant to commit when JJ was likely because, although they play different positions it would be naive to think JJ would not effect Alkins minutes. I hope I am way off base here because I want JJ more than any recruit I can remember.

He doesn't play the same position as Jackson, and he cannot swing to the 4. JJ is a natural 3, who if we want additional minutes for, we can play small with him at 4.

If J backs up Lauri at the 4, even if Chance plays both 4 and 5, JJ can easily get 10 mpg at the 4. Add a 20/20 split or even 24/16 with JJ getting the 16 and you're left with JJ pulling 26-30 mpg.

I agree with RG that Ferguson and potentially Trier have a far larger effect on Alkins's minutes. Although we may still want Ferguson, I think Alkins is smart enough to know that if we land him and JJ, Ferguson probably isn't coming to Tucson.

gronk4heisman · Post by **gronk4heisman** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:30 am

Spaceman Spiff wrote:
gronk4heisman wrote:No one thinks that the timing of this is at all weird? Word was he was planning on waiting, and then the Monday after JJ's MSU official he decides he is announcing. Maybe I am a pessimist, but I do believe that the staff is doubtful they will get JJ after hearing things post visit and told Alkins such. Alkin's was probably reluctant to commit when JJ was likely because, although they play different positions it would be naive to think JJ would not effect Alkins minutes. I hope I am way off base here because I want JJ more than any recruit I can remember.
He doesn't play the same position as Jackson, and he cannot swing to the 4. JJ is a natural 3, who if we want additional minutes for, we can play small with him at 4.

If J backs up Lauri at the 4, even if Chance plays both 4 and 5, JJ can easily get 10 mpg at the 4. Add a 20/20 split or even 24/16 with JJ getting the 16 and you're left with JJ pulling 26-30 mpg.

I agree with RG that Ferguson and potentially Trier have a far larger effect on Alkins's minutes. Although we may still want Ferguson, I think Alkins is smart enough to know that if we land him and JJ, Ferguson probably isn't coming to Tucson.

My point was that JJ would effect Alkins minutes, not the other way around. Alkins will not effect JJ's minutes. Which is why I think it would take Alkin's hearing something for him to change his mind and commit early. Alkins would be toward the bottom of the totum pole. JJ would be at the top.

HiCat · Post by **HiCat** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:30 am

78% hope the math is right

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-ch ... 50602.html" target="_blank

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:33 am

The Goat wrote:Markanen, Simmons, and Alkins. Swoon. Add Jackson and it turns into a cleanup time. Add Ferguson and well we all better go check our lease because we're living in fuck city.

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:36 am

In case you hear the repeated assertion that it's questionable that Alkins will meet Initial Eligibility requirements and be cleared to play by the NCAA, just shut down the conversation right there. There's nothing to it. His qualifications are no more at issue than any student athlete.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:27 am

Longhorned wrote:In case you hear the repeated assertion that it's questionable that Alkins will meet Initial Eligibility requirements and be cleared to play by the NCAA, just shut down the conversation right there. There's nothing to it. His qualifications are no more at issue than any student athlete.

I think there are still questions out there.

ChooChooCat · Post by **ChooChooCat** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:40 am

Chicat wrote:
Longhorned wrote:In case you hear the repeated assertion that it's questionable that Alkins will meet Initial Eligibility requirements and be cleared to play by the NCAA, just shut down the conversation right there. There's nothing to it. His qualifications are no more at issue than any student athlete.
I think there are still questions out there.

Yeah there will be questions until the NCAA says ok.

rgdeuce · Post by **rgdeuce** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:43 am

gronk4heisman wrote:
My point was that JJ would effect Alkins minutes, not the other way around. Alkins will not effect JJ's minutes. Which is why I think it would take Alkin's hearing something for him to change his mind and commit early. Alkins would be toward the bottom of the totum pole. JJ would be at the top.

It's questionable JJ will even play the 2 though and there probably isnt a need, at least at this point. This isnt a Stanley Johnson situation, where you have Zeus, Ashley and Rondae, so Stanley moves to the 2 so you can have your five best players starting/finishing games. And remember, some of that season involved Rondae coming off the bench too. Its going to take a lot from Ristic, a freshman Lauri, and a RS freshman coming off two years of missed ball to make that happen. JJ only affects his minutes if he was hoping for a three guard lineup/Trier at the 3. If Trier doesnt come back, Alkins has a good shot at starting no matter what decision JJ makes and there will also be a lot of PT if he does what he needs to do.

Dave · Post by **Dave** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:08 pm

I will welcome him with open arms. He is a man among boys.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:13 pm

rgdeuce wrote:
gronk4heisman wrote:
My point was that JJ would effect Alkins minutes, not the other way around. Alkins will not effect JJ's minutes. Which is why I think it would take Alkin's hearing something for him to change his mind and commit early. Alkins would be toward the bottom of the totum pole. JJ would be at the top.
It's questionable JJ will even play the 2 though and there probably isnt a need, at least at this point. This isnt a Stanley Johnson situation, where you have Zeus, Ashley and Rondae, so Stanley moves to the 2 so you can have your five best players starting/finishing games. And remember, some of that season involved Rondae coming off the bench too. Its going to take a lot from Ristic, a freshman Lauri, and a RS freshman coming off two years of missed ball to make that happen. JJ only affects his minutes if he was hoping for a three guard lineup/Trier at the 3. If Trier doesnt come back, Alkins has a good shot at starting no matter what decision JJ makes and there will also be a lot of PT if he does what he needs to do.

The big effect for Alkins is Trier. If Trier returns, Alkins isn't starting at the 2. If Trier leaves, Alkins is the presumptive guy there.

The timing thing I don't get for Alkins is why he doesn't wait to confirm whether Trier is gone if he is seriously considering us.

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Mon Mar 07, 2016 12:31 pm

The Goat wrote:Markanen, Simmons, and Alkins. Swoon. Add Jackson and it turns into a cleanup time. Add Ferguson and well we all better go check our lease because we're living in fuck city.

I want them all, and I think Miller is in "gloves off" mode now too after the Rabb recruitment.

No conference ref hand-picked by Scott would be able to stop that roster, and I would love to see it play like it and just blow away every barrier. Tweet away, guys, we've got three others ready on the bench.

Plus, we wouldn't be UK if we got 'em all...we'd know better and run things better. Miller's in a different league than Calipari as far as bench coaches go IMHO.

Login • Register