Seriously CSM, John Mayer?
![Image](http://cbssports.com/images/CBSjukeboxsouthbracket.jpg)
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
And if you do find a mid-major with a resume like that, please tell me how many coaches they've had over the last ten years because they're definitely not going to be able to keep coaches who consistently get to the second weekend of the tourney.Alieberman wrote:Olsondogg wrote:Uh, what?Puerco wrote:That resume reads like that of an elite mid major. Unfortunately he's no longer at a mid-major program.
I was going to say the same thing. Show me a mid major with a resume anywhere close to that...
CSM is one of the top 5 recruiters in the nation, and he's been to 2 straight regional finals. He is a fiery but classy guy, and his players love him. Hard to ask for much more.Olsondogg wrote: I remember the years after Lute. I remember the circus it took to get Miller into Tucson. I may be a homer, but I don't kid myself that Arizona can do better than the coach they have.
THIS! Exactly BC97.... Would also add a great and passionate coach as well as a great ambassador for UA Basketball. Enough said. BTFD.Beachcat97 wrote:CSM is one of the top 5 recruiters in the nation, and he's been to 2 straight regional finals. He is a fiery but classy guy, and his players love him. Hard to ask for much more.Olsondogg wrote: I remember the years after Lute. I remember the circus it took to get Miller into Tucson. I may be a homer, but I don't kid myself that Arizona can do better than the coach they have.
It was a sign.CBCat wrote:wearing red even back then!!
I had no idea he was 6'2".AZCatGirl wrote:http://www.campusrush.com/sean-miller-a ... 92834.html
Really good article about his weight loss.
Well when you spend the last couple years around tarc, Ristic, Anderson, Stanley Johnson, Ashley, Gordon... You're going to look small.BearDown89 wrote:I had no idea he was 6'2".AZCatGirl wrote:http://www.campusrush.com/sean-miller-a ... 92834.html
Really good article about his weight loss.
Hey, Odogg. Instead of being a presumptuous asshole and answering your own question on my behalf, maybe you should let me answer the question myself? How's that sound? Nah, probably too difficult for you. But I'll answer anyway.Olsondogg wrote:I'll answer for Puerco...it's mid major cause of no Final 4.
Which is shit btw. So sick of this, I mean, Lute...a HOF coach, got to one in his 7th year of coaching at Iowa, and his 4th year of coaching at Arizona, his 14th year of coaching overall. That's impressive and is great for us. He reached the Final 4 again 6 years after that...
It takes time to do things sometimes. Perhaps it's the "on demand" nature of society today, but the mantra that Miller "needs to get us to the Final 4" is bullshit. It will happen eventually as it does with every coach worth anything in CBB, and a few not worth anything.
Furthermore, once Miller gets Arizona to the Final 4, and god forbid LOSES that game, the focus inevitably changes to "Miller needs to get us a natty".
I remember the years after Lute. I remember the circus it took to get Miller into Tucson. I may be a homer, but I don't kid myself that Arizona can do better than the coach they have.
This is going to be his biggest test since arriving in Tucson. WSU is a tough out for a first round game, and Miami is not a happy draw for us. Pretty odd, though. If you look at 538's predictions, they have us at a 31% chance of making the Sweet Sixteen, which isn't great. But if you break down the match-ups it looks like they would have us favored in a game with Miami, which seems bizarre. That means they think we have a better chance of beating Miami than we do WSU...97cats wrote:Sean Miller is 12-0 in the first weekend of the NCAA Tournament when seeded six or better
Wasn't Brandon Ashley 6'2 too?ASUHATER! wrote:Well when you spend the last couple years around tarc, Ristic, Anderson, Stanley Johnson, Ashley, Gordon... You're going to look small.BearDown89 wrote:I had no idea he was 6'2".AZCatGirl wrote:http://www.campusrush.com/sean-miller-a ... 92834.html
Really good article about his weight loss.
John Mayer is phenomenal when he plays the blues he was taught by Buddy Guy. The other 99.999% of the time he's a douchenozzle one step removed from Michael Bolton status.scumdevils86 wrote:Only person I know that likes John Mayer is my 60 year old mother
I'm mostly rap, with older r&b/soul and classic rock to round me out, so you wont catch me with anything outside of that outside of a few albums... But his debut album was actually very very good. Got it as a "remembrance" gift from a brief summer fling and actually gave it a lot of spin. Lot of blues and folk influence with some neo-soul (before it became overdone) thrown in. Top to bottom, only one or two songs most people will skip, and I probably throw it on once a year and still enjoy it. Even my father, who is a "anything after 1985 sucks" music snob liked it. I remember buying his second album and trading it in within a week. I'm sure he still has flashes of his old self, but it was easy to see the direction he took once "Your body is a wonderland" got all the girls moist and he blew up. He's a talented dude.Chicat wrote: John Mayer is phenomenal when he plays the blues he was taught by Buddy Guy. The other 99.999% of the time he's a douchenozzle one step removed from Michael Bolton status.
Maybe CSM is into the 0.001% John Mayer...
Puerco wrote:Hey, Odogg. Instead of being a presumptuous asshole and answering your own question on my behalf, maybe you should let me answer the question myself? How's that sound? Nah, probably too difficult for you. But I'll answer anyway.Olsondogg wrote:I'll answer for Puerco...it's mid major cause of no Final 4.
Which is shit btw. So sick of this, I mean, Lute...a HOF coach, got to one in his 7th year of coaching at Iowa, and his 4th year of coaching at Arizona, his 14th year of coaching overall. That's impressive and is great for us. He reached the Final 4 again 6 years after that...
It takes time to do things sometimes. Perhaps it's the "on demand" nature of society today, but the mantra that Miller "needs to get us to the Final 4" is bullshit. It will happen eventually as it does with every coach worth anything in CBB, and a few not worth anything.
Furthermore, once Miller gets Arizona to the Final 4, and god forbid LOSES that game, the focus inevitably changes to "Miller needs to get us a natty".
I remember the years after Lute. I remember the circus it took to get Miller into Tucson. I may be a homer, but I don't kid myself that Arizona can do better than the coach they have.
This:
Record vs Kenpom top 10: 2-7
Record vs Kenpom 11-30: 7-0
Record vs Kenpom 31-50: 1-1
Record vs Kenpom 51+: 7-0
Is not the record of an elite major program. Now, before you go getting all defensive, please remember that Sean Miller has been, in fact, the coach of an elite mid-major program for half his career. You know, I know, and every UA basketball fan knows that until recently he'd never lost to a lower seeded team, and we all know he's never been to the Final Four. His record above pretty much reads exactly like you would expect knowing those facts.
So, what would you expect from an elite mid-major coach? I'd expect him to dominate against the middle and lower seeded teams in the tourney. Miller? Check. I'd expect him to post a good record against the high but not top seeds in the tourney? Miller? Check, and then some. I'd also expect him to struggle beyond the Sweet Sixteen when you've narrowed the field down to the top 5-10 teams in the country. Miller? Check.
So what's your argument against that? Miller has a very, very good tournament record. He's beaten all but the very best of the best in the tournament, but do you think for one minute that Kensas or Kentucky fans would be happy about it? I don't. The record vs. Kenpom 1-10 is what needs to improve for Arizona to achieve its (and I dare say Miller's) goals. Argue if you like, but I can assure you that none of us (including Miller) are going to be satisfied until he hangs his first banner. He will do it some day, I have no doubt. I just hope it's in Tucson.
EDIT: and how on earth are you lumping me in with your mythical 'UA needs a better coach' crowd? I don't believe that. I've never said that, and quite frankly the only one who keeps banging on about it is you. I have literally never heard anyone on this site claiming any such thing. Except maybe Rise and Fire and even he says he likes Miller. So you're tilting at windmills as usual with your last sentence. But hey, keep on doing your thing: making crap up, trying to stifle conversation, and generally being a jerk. We're used to it.
Maybe being into John Mayer is why we have not broken into the Final Four yet. If he was into DMX, it's hard to imagine losing in the Elite Eight.Chicat wrote:John Mayer is phenomenal when he plays the blues he was taught by Buddy Guy. The other 99.999% of the time he's a douchenozzle one step removed from Michael Bolton status.scumdevils86 wrote:Only person I know that likes John Mayer is my 60 year old mother
Maybe CSM is into the 0.001% John Mayer...
Nick wanted to tell him he was committing in person at McKale.Olsondogg wrote:If this is true, and Mayer is Sean's (not Amy's) favorite...consider this. Wasn't he driving to a concert Mayer gave in PHX and did a U-turn cause Nick Johnson wanted to visit McKale?
I didn't either until I met him two years ago. I was shocked he was a little taller than I am. I had thought for sure he was shorter.BearDown89 wrote:I had no idea he was 6'2".AZCatGirl wrote:http://www.campusrush.com/sean-miller-a ... 92834.html
Really good article about his weight loss.
My uncle met Steve Kerr when Kerr was still playing in the NBA. That was his first reaction, that you think he's small because of who surrounds him, then you meet him in person and realize 6'3 is a pretty big guy when there aren't a bunch of 6'10 guys surrounding him.Bear Down Vegas wrote:I didn't either until I met him two years ago. I was shocked he was a little taller than I am. I had thought for sure he was shorter.BearDown89 wrote:I had no idea he was 6'2".AZCatGirl wrote:http://www.campusrush.com/sean-miller-a ... 92834.html
Really good article about his weight loss.
Also - that weight loss article was really cool - thanks for that.
that's my dad. he literally won't give anything after 1986 a chance.rgdeuce wrote:I'm mostly rap, with older r&b/soul and classic rock to round me out, so you wont catch me with anything outside of that outside of a few albums... But his debut album was actually very very good. Got it as a "remembrance" gift from a brief summer fling and actually gave it a lot of spin. Lot of blues and folk influence with some neo-soul (before it became overdone) thrown in. Top to bottom, only one or two songs most people will skip, and I probably throw it on once a year and still enjoy it. Even my father, who is a "anything after 1985 sucks" music snob liked it. I remember buying his second album and trading it in within a week. I'm sure he still has flashes of his old self, but it was easy to see the direction he took once "Your body is a wonderland" got all the girls moist and he blew up. He's a talented dude.Chicat wrote: John Mayer is phenomenal when he plays the blues he was taught by Buddy Guy. The other 99.999% of the time he's a douchenozzle one step removed from Michael Bolton status.
Maybe CSM is into the 0.001% John Mayer...
This is mind boggling stupid, most mid-major coaches would be happy to just participate in 25 NCAA Tournament games for their entire career.Puerco wrote:Hey, Odogg. Instead of being a presumptuous asshole and answering your own question on my behalf, maybe you should let me answer the question myself? How's that sound? Nah, probably too difficult for you. But I'll answer anyway.Olsondogg wrote:I'll answer for Puerco...it's mid major cause of no Final 4.
Which is shit btw. So sick of this, I mean, Lute...a HOF coach, got to one in his 7th year of coaching at Iowa, and his 4th year of coaching at Arizona, his 14th year of coaching overall. That's impressive and is great for us. He reached the Final 4 again 6 years after that...
It takes time to do things sometimes. Perhaps it's the "on demand" nature of society today, but the mantra that Miller "needs to get us to the Final 4" is bullshit. It will happen eventually as it does with every coach worth anything in CBB, and a few not worth anything.
Furthermore, once Miller gets Arizona to the Final 4, and god forbid LOSES that game, the focus inevitably changes to "Miller needs to get us a natty".
I remember the years after Lute. I remember the circus it took to get Miller into Tucson. I may be a homer, but I don't kid myself that Arizona can do better than the coach they have.
This:
Record vs Kenpom top 10: 2-7
Record vs Kenpom 11-30: 7-0
Record vs Kenpom 31-50: 1-1
Record vs Kenpom 51+: 7-0
Is not the record of an elite major program. Now, before you go getting all defensive, please remember that Sean Miller has been, in fact, the coach of an elite mid-major program for half his career. You know, I know, and every UA basketball fan knows that until recently he'd never lost to a lower seeded team, and we all know he's never been to the Final Four. His record above pretty much reads exactly like you would expect knowing those facts.
So, what would you expect from an elite mid-major coach? I'd expect him to dominate against the middle and lower seeded teams in the tourney. Miller? Check. I'd expect him to post a good record against the high but not top seeds in the tourney? Miller? Check, and then some. I'd also expect him to struggle beyond the Sweet Sixteen when you've narrowed the field down to the top 5-10 teams in the country. Miller? Check.
So what's your argument against that? Miller has a very, very good tournament record. He's beaten all but the very best of the best in the tournament, but do you think for one minute that Kensas or Kentucky fans would be happy about it? I don't. The record vs. Kenpom 1-10 is what needs to improve for Arizona to achieve its (and I dare say Miller's) goals. Argue if you like, but I can assure you that none of us (including Miller) are going to be satisfied until he hangs his first banner. He will do it some day, I have no doubt. I just hope it's in Tucson.
EDIT: and how on earth are you lumping me in with your mythical 'UA needs a better coach' crowd? I don't believe that. I've never said that, and quite frankly the only one who keeps banging on about it is you. I have literally never heard anyone on this site claiming any such thing. Except maybe Rise and Fire and even he says he likes Miller. So you're tilting at windmills as usual with your last sentence. But hey, keep on doing your thing: making crap up, trying to stifle conversation, and generally being a jerk. We're used to it.
I was at the urinal next to Jason Kidd at the Blackhawks game on Monday night. Couldn't believe how tall he was, and that he wasn't in a suite. Also couldn't understand why he was dressed like he was homeless.Spaceman Spiff wrote:My uncle met Steve Kerr when Kerr was still playing in the NBA. That was his first reaction, that you think he's small because of who surrounds him, then you meet him in person and realize 6'3 is a pretty big guy when there aren't a bunch of 6'10 guys surrounding him.Bear Down Vegas wrote:I didn't either until I met him two years ago. I was shocked he was a little taller than I am. I had thought for sure he was shorter.BearDown89 wrote:I had no idea he was 6'2".AZCatGirl wrote:http://www.campusrush.com/sean-miller-a ... 92834.html
Really good article about his weight loss.
Also - that weight loss article was really cool - thanks for that.
This is a high quality, informative post. We have just not had breaks. Even within those games, we caught a UConn team on a crazy hot streak, got the best game of Kaminsky's career to that point and then Wisky had the best offensive half in NCAA tournament history.rgdeuce wrote:Puero, don't be ridiculous. The tournament is such a crap shoot to begin with, and all things aren't equal. Sean Miller at Arizona is a perfect example. He is 2-4 at Arizona, but lets look at the below scenarios and see how his battle has been more uphill than a lot of others. Again, not all things are equal and for many teams, a lot of luck and help from "others" helps dictate deep runs and final fours. Kenpom rankings in parenthesis.
2015: Wisconsin (3) beat Arizona (2); Kentucky (1) beat Notre Dame (9); Michigan State (15) beat Louisville (16); (4) Duke beat Gonzaga (7). So conveniently, we draw by far the worst elite possible 8 match up compared to the winners. Only Kentucky, a 1 vs 2 matchup, would have been a worse draw than the #3 team. Look who the winners had to play compared to us...
2014: Wisconsin (6) beat Arizona (2); Florida (3) beat Dayton (38); UCONN (8) beat Michigan State (9); Kentucky (11) beat Michigan (10). Is this 2015 all over again? Again, only one possible worst case scenario, a 3 vs 2 matchup w Florida. But instead, Florida gets a team almost outside the top 40. The other two winners were equally matched, but again, per kenpom, more favorable matchups.
2013: Sweet 16 loss: Ohio State (7) beats Arizona (15). Out of the remaining teams we could have played in the sweet 16, only 5 were better that Ohio State per Kenpom, so essentially we were on the wrong side of 33% odds. It happens, but I see a pattern here of us not getting the breaks as so many others..
2011: Beat Duke (4) and Texas (6). UCONN (9) beats Arizona (23) in Elite 8. Name one other team in that tournament who played three kenpom 10 teams before the final 4 that year? Or the whole tournament period? The most I see is one up through after the elite 8 games (multiple teams). UCONN played a total of two the entire tournament (Kentucky and San Diego St), second to only us. Again, see a pattern here?
So yea, Miller is 2-4. That record is probably a lot different with some actual "breaks" and we probably have a few more banners hanging up.
Possibly because he was homeless.Chicat wrote:I was at the urinal next to Jason Kidd at the Blackhawks game on Monday night. Couldn't believe how tall he was, and that he wasn't in a suite. Also couldn't understand why he was dressed like he was homeless.Spaceman Spiff wrote:My uncle met Steve Kerr when Kerr was still playing in the NBA. That was his first reaction, that you think he's small because of who surrounds him, then you meet him in person and realize 6'3 is a pretty big guy when there aren't a bunch of 6'10 guys surrounding him.Bear Down Vegas wrote:I didn't either until I met him two years ago. I was shocked he was a little taller than I am. I had thought for sure he was shorter.BearDown89 wrote:I had no idea he was 6'2".AZCatGirl wrote:http://www.campusrush.com/sean-miller-a ... 92834.html
Really good article about his weight loss.
Also - that weight loss article was really cool - thanks for that.
Damn, never thought of that...Olsondogg wrote:Possibly because he was homeless.Chicat wrote:I was at the urinal next to Jason Kidd at the Blackhawks game on Monday night. Couldn't believe how tall he was, and that he wasn't in a suite. Also couldn't understand why he was dressed like he was homeless.
I was talking to a friend about this the other day. IMO and before the "then who should we hire!! fire Miller!!" crowd jumps up in arms, Miller up to this point at Arizona is a coach that hasn't really overachieved, hasn't really underachieve, he performs kinda to what you expect. By expect, I mean pre-season forecast and talent that he recruits. The record above and his tournament record falls in line with that narrative.Puerco wrote:Hey, Odogg. Instead of being a presumptuous asshole and answering your own question on my behalf, maybe you should let me answer the question myself? How's that sound? Nah, probably too difficult for you. But I'll answer anyway.Olsondogg wrote:I'll answer for Puerco...it's mid major cause of no Final 4.
Which is shit btw. So sick of this, I mean, Lute...a HOF coach, got to one in his 7th year of coaching at Iowa, and his 4th year of coaching at Arizona, his 14th year of coaching overall. That's impressive and is great for us. He reached the Final 4 again 6 years after that...
It takes time to do things sometimes. Perhaps it's the "on demand" nature of society today, but the mantra that Miller "needs to get us to the Final 4" is bullshit. It will happen eventually as it does with every coach worth anything in CBB, and a few not worth anything.
Furthermore, once Miller gets Arizona to the Final 4, and god forbid LOSES that game, the focus inevitably changes to "Miller needs to get us a natty".
I remember the years after Lute. I remember the circus it took to get Miller into Tucson. I may be a homer, but I don't kid myself that Arizona can do better than the coach they have.
This:
Record vs Kenpom top 10: 2-7
Record vs Kenpom 11-30: 7-0
Record vs Kenpom 31-50: 1-1
Record vs Kenpom 51+: 7-0
Is not the record of an elite major program. Now, before you go getting all defensive, please remember that Sean Miller has been, in fact, the coach of an elite mid-major program for half his career. You know, I know, and every UA basketball fan knows that until recently he'd never lost to a lower seeded team, and we all know he's never been to the Final Four. His record above pretty much reads exactly like you would expect knowing those facts.
So, what would you expect from an elite mid-major coach? I'd expect him to dominate against the middle and lower seeded teams in the tourney. Miller? Check. I'd expect him to post a good record against the high but not top seeds in the tourney? Miller? Check, and then some. I'd also expect him to struggle beyond the Sweet Sixteen when you've narrowed the field down to the top 5-10 teams in the country. Miller? Check.
So what's your argument against that? Miller has a very, very good tournament record. He's beaten all but the very best of the best in the tournament, but do you think for one minute that Kensas or Kentucky fans would be happy about it? I don't. The record vs. Kenpom 1-10 is what needs to improve for Arizona to achieve its (and I dare say Miller's) goals. Argue if you like, but I can assure you that none of us (including Miller) are going to be satisfied until he hangs his first banner. He will do it some day, I have no doubt. I just hope it's in Tucson.
EDIT: and how on earth are you lumping me in with your mythical 'UA needs a better coach' crowd? I don't believe that. I've never said that, and quite frankly the only one who keeps banging on about it is you. I have literally never heard anyone on this site claiming any such thing. Except maybe Rise and Fire and even he says he likes Miller. So you're tilting at windmills as usual with your last sentence. But hey, keep on doing your thing: making crap up, trying to stifle conversation, and generally being a jerk. We're used to it.
This, a thousand times this. When Miller took over, if you told me he'd have 3 Elite Eights in his first 6 years, I would have peed my pants in happiness. Arizona was pretty much Nic Wise, Kyle Fogg, Jamelle Horne and zero recruits in the pipeline.EVCat wrote:but the "performs up to expectations" are the expectations he helped set.
We were a crater in 2010. If he had built slowly, we would be saying "wow...so glad coach Miller got us back to making the tournament."
Instead he got to an Elite Eight in 2 years, and 3 in 5 years. The expectations were set by his program overachieving early. In 2014, we were down a big piece. The only year I think we might have failed to hit the mark was last year. Otherwise, 2011 overachieved, 2013 was probably where it should have been but a big shot from another overachieving Elite Eight, 2014 was just about right after losing Brandon and having to play AG out of position, and last year was a coin flip game that we lost.
But the fact that the program is where it is so quickly is, to me, overachievement. Yeah, Miller has room to grow. He is still young, and has a lot of room for improvement. I also think the fanbase making this magical one more game into a holy grail is creation of a false achievement...winning 3 games in the NCAA is an achievement in itself. I get the Final Four is the marketing piece, but that is not indicative of some kind of special achievement...it is one more win.
So he is damned by his own level of achievement. Like Lute losing so often in the first round, discounting that he created a program that lost in the first round on their worst year, rather than missing the tournament altogether. 1992 and 1993 aside, were any of the first round losses shocking? Or were we overseeded for what we had?
Miller took a disaster and fixed it immediately. And has gotten to the Elite Eight 3 times in 5 years. And with 2011 came increased expectations of the return of Arizona. It created a false narrative that almost bit us when Miller started reaching on talented knuckleheads. I don't see a single year where we lost a game we clearly should have won, but I have seen us win when we weren't expected to. And that early success led to a level of expectation/seeding where you can't really exceed expectations...you can only fail or meet them. I have no problems with anything our program has done in the last 5 years, and am amazed at how many of our fans forget just how close we were to total irrelevance...
HiCat wrote:"We're in for one heckuva battle ...
http://www.kansas.com/sports/article66508832.html" target="_blank
This is all I've seenCBCat wrote:HiCat wrote:"We're in for one heckuva battle ...
http://www.kansas.com/sports/article66508832.html" target="_blank
Anybody have a link to CSM and players full presser in Providence?
Exactly my point. Where do you get the stats? I hunted all over for them and couldn't find anything similar. For the record, when I thought of elite mid-major coach, I was thinking Brad Stevens minus the Final Fours. Few actually has a worse overall record (glaringly so against KP11-30), but his record against the top and bottom looks similar.thenewazcats wrote:I dont post often but in my experience Puerco has been a solid poster with intelligent commentary. It is worth the time to hear what he is trying to say. I hear elite mid major coach and immediately think of Mark Few:
vs Kenpom top 10 in the tournament: 0-8
vs Kenpom 11-20: 1-5
vs Kenpom 21+: 13-1
Miller actually has won only one game in the 11-20 range, just like Few. Miller has had more success and typically advances further than Gonzaga. He has also faced all but two of his top 10 opponents beyond the second round. Few has actually had the disadvantage of working AT a mid major, so his seeding and tournament path has suffered.
Miller's resume looks great, hence Puerco's use of "elite" when linking the look of his resume to that of a coach at a mid major, but he has work to do, and I don't think any of us doubt that he is on his way.
I also believe that enough of the games versus top 10 teams were very close and could have gone the other way. But once a game is in the books, it is in the books. Miller's resume may be deceiving but it is what it is until he gets that much deserved breakthrough.
The reason I begin putting those numbers together was to illustrate the fact that despite an inconsistent season with what were probably predictable results, there is still some serious hope for Arizona to make some noise in this tournament.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes! Thank you.EVCat wrote:but the "performs up to expectations" are the expectations he helped set.
We were a crater in 2010. If he had built slowly, we would be saying "wow...so glad coach Miller got us back to making the tournament."
Instead he got to an Elite Eight in 2 years, and 3 in 5 years. The expectations were set by his program overachieving early. In 2014, we were down a big piece. The only year I think we might have failed to hit the mark was last year. Otherwise, 2011 overachieved, 2013 was probably where it should have been but a big shot from another overachieving Elite Eight, 2014 was just about right after losing Brandon and having to play AG out of position, and last year was a coin flip game that we lost.
But the fact that the program is where it is so quickly is, to me, overachievement. Yeah, Miller has room to grow. He is still young, and has a lot of room for improvement. I also think the fanbase making this magical one more game into a holy grail is creation of a false achievement...winning 3 games in the NCAA is an achievement in itself. I get the Final Four is the marketing piece, but that is not indicative of some kind of special achievement...it is one more win.
So he is damned by his own level of achievement. Like Lute losing so often in the first round, discounting that he created a program that lost in the first round on their worst year, rather than missing the tournament altogether. 1992 and 1993 aside, were any of the first round losses shocking? Or were we overseeded for what we had?
Miller took a disaster and fixed it immediately. And has gotten to the Elite Eight 3 times in 5 years. And with 2011 came increased expectations of the return of Arizona. It created a false narrative that almost bit us when Miller started reaching on talented knuckleheads. I don't see a single year where we lost a game we clearly should have won, but I have seen us win when we weren't expected to. And that early success led to a level of expectation/seeding where you can't really exceed expectations...you can only fail or meet them. I have no problems with anything our program has done in the last 5 years, and am amazed at how many of our fans forget just how close we were to total irrelevance...