Pac 12 Game Thread

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 5:48 pm

Yeah asu is on track to give up 300+ yards rushing to unm.

Salty · Post by **Salty** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 5:59 pm

asu does not have a good defense

illcat · Post by **illcat** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:01 pm

Lobos giving assu all they can handle.

prh · Post by **prh** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:17 pm

This Oregon game has been so strange. For 5 minutes in the first quarter Oregon looked like worldbeaters, then terrible for 35 minutes, then 5 worldbeating minutes to close the 3rd.

illcat · Post by **illcat** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:48 pm

Disregard my previous post about Lobos. It's getting ugly. Jury is still out on Mich St., don't think there are any doubts about the quacks.

Post by **UAdevil** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:58 pm

Thanks Oregon. Needed you by 13.5...just gotta kill a minute

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 8:22 pm

Pac 12 teams I'm not impressed by at all:
Ucla
Washington
Washington state
Colorado

Teams I am impressed by:
Oregon
Usc
Cal
Utah

Jury's out:
Asu
Stanford
Oregon state

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 8:36 pm

I realize that they have zero chance...but...I sure wouldn't mind seeing Memphis upset ucla

OSUCat · Post by **OSUCat** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:04 pm

I know it's only a half, but how is Memphis within 7 to UCLA? It's freaking Memphis.

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:16 pm

I dunno OSUCat. I've not watch the entire game.

But in my watchign the last 10-15 minutes of the game.....
ucla gets away with a ton of holding

::::

Aaaaaaaaaaaaand I think that does it for memphis
::::

ahahahah memphis just tied it. nice. still have zero chance, but it sure is funny.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:50 pm

What the fuckla?

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:52 pm

ASUHATER! wrote:Pac 12 teams I'm not impressed by at all:
Ucla
Washington
Washington state
Colorado

Teams I am impressed by:
Oregon
Usc
Cal
Utah

Jury's out:
Asu
Stanford
Oregon state

And Arizona?

Zona_Soccer10 · Post by **Zona_Soccer10** » Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:03 pm

UCLA is looking very vulnerable. Just as we did. But honestly, I think UTSA is a better team than Memphis. And as we know, Wazzu is Wazzu.

MrBug708 · Post by **MrBug708** » Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:32 am

I was wondering were all this Memphis magic was coming from

Nice try PoM

qwertyus · Post by **qwertyus** » Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:33 am

ASUHATER! wrote:Pac 12 teams I'm not impressed by at all:
Ucla
Washington
Washington state
Colorado
Stanford

Teams I am impressed by:
Oregon
Cal
Utah

Jury's out:
ASU
Oregon state
USC
Arizona

Changed to my own preferences.
I don't think Stanford can scrounge up 10 points at home and not be classified as 'unimpressive'.

Almost losing at home to Memphis? That'd be like if we were close to losing at home to UNLV. Not impressed with UCLA, no idea why they couldn't stop the run, I guess Barr was pretty key for them?

Washington's escaped unscathed from two games that they should be able to win much more comfortably.

WSU is in full-on "Coug'd it" mode already.

Colorado lost to CSU, so their win vs. lil' UMASS doesn't give them many brownie points with me.

Oregon ran all over MSU, although looking at how the rest of the B1G did, maybe this win won't be so big in a couple of weeks.

Cal's improved. I don't know if they'll bowl, but they're improved from last year.

Utah's looked pretty good beating up on some mediocre teams. Looks like they're at least better than LY.

ASU's defense has ? marks. Offense looks explosive though.

OSU has not done much.

I don't know how good USC actually is. They inexplicably ground out a win better than Stanford, I just don't think that 13 points will be anywhere close to what's needed when they face the spread PAC teams.

I don't know about us. We rolled a bad team, ground out a win vs. a decent non-Power 5 Conference team away, but we've still got a young QB. I don't know how he's going to hold up. I'll need to see the next two games before I make a judgement.

azthrillhouse · Post by **azthrillhouse** » Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:57 am

Good takes qwerty.

What's becoming clear after these first two weeks: outside of maybe Oregon, there are no unstoppable juggernauts in this conference. UCLA is still good, but a "great" team would not play the way they have these first 2 weeks.

USC is hard to read. I do think Stanford lost that game far more than USC won it.

Hard to extrapolate how these teams will be playing when we meet them but right now the only game I won't be pissed if we lose is Oregon.

Scummy Dick Douglas · Post by **Scummy Dick Douglas** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:14 am

azthrillhouse wrote:Good takes qwerty.

What's becoming clear after these first two weeks: outside of maybe Oregon, there are no unstoppable juggernauts in this conference. UCLA is still good, but a "great" team would not play the way they have these first 2 weeks.

USC is hard to read. I do think Stanford lost that game far more than USC won it.

Hard to extrapolate how these teams will be playing when we meet them but right now the only game I won't be pissed if we lose is Oregon.

^This. Stanford was inside the USC 30 something like 10 times yet only had 10 points to show for it. Had Stanford stuck to its traditional smashmouth, conservative style of play and not gotten cute with the playcalling, they would have won this comfortably.

Catstatic · Post by **Catstatic** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:51 am

That chop block call was atrocious. The offensive lineman was not engaged when the running back took out the guy on the blitz. If anything, the o lineman was diving at the guy trying to block him. Took 7 points off the board for Stanford. Huge, huge call. Happened after Haden was summoned to the sidelines. Wonder if coaches will add that previously unheard of wrinkle to their game plan?

Regardless, Stanford shot itself in the foot so many times it was laughable. I thought we had red zone issues, until I watched Stanford. They should have beaten SC by 2 TD's at least. Tough, tough loss for the Cardinal.

Go Cats!!

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:55 am

I don't fret over Furd tears.

Way to Go USC. Going to make our win over them that much sweeter.

the real dill · Post by **the real dill** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:34 am

Retweeted by FootballScoop Staff
Arash Markazi ‏@ArashMarkazi 4m
Larry Scott: "The conduct by both Sarkisian and Haden were in clear violation of our Conference’s Standards of Conduct policy."

gumby · Post by **gumby** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:43 am

TheBlackLodge wrote:Looks like Washington is going to hang on against EWU. 52 points is a lot to give up to an FCS team.

EWU scored 49 against the Beavers last year. Vernon Adams is a stud. Eleven TD passes and almost 900 yards against two Pac-12 teams. And cramped up in both games.

Reminds me of Russell Wilson. "Too short," but can make all the throws and can run.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:44 am

the real dill wrote:Retweeted by FootballScoop Staff
Arash Markazi ‏@ArashMarkazi 4m
Larry Scott: "The conduct by both Sarkisian and Haden were in clear violation of our Conference’s Standards of Conduct policy."

Translation: don't touch Larry Scott's Zebras.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:51 am

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:09 pm

azgreg wrote:

Haden and Miller should get together and plant the seeds for a coup.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:10 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:Haden and Miller should get together and plant the seeds for a coup.

"He touched the ref!!"

AZCatGirl · Post by **AZCatGirl** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:21 pm

What is with Larry Scott and $25,000 fines? Is that just the standard amount any coach gets if he's found to be inappropriate?

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:14 pm

WTF is this thing?

https://vine.co/v/OuEJie1eZXv

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:21 pm

azgreg wrote:WTF is this thing?

https://vine.co/v/OuEJie1eZXv

The monster that tongues your butthole in your worst nightmare.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:26 pm

Chicat wrote:
azgreg wrote:WTF is this thing?

https://vine.co/v/OuEJie1eZXv
The monster that tongues your butthole in your worst nightmare.

My worst nightmare is waking up without my dick, but that's not far behind.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:26 pm

"Oh the tree, its so out there, no other school can do what we do here at Furd. Crazy Tree"

fuck the tree.

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:43 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:"Oh the tree, its so out there, no other school can do what we do here at Furd. Crazy Tree"

fuck the tree.

You haven't seen "Treevenge" have you?

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:48 pm

ghostwhitehorse wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:"Oh the tree, its so out there, no other school can do what we do here at Furd. Crazy Tree"

fuck the tree.
You haven't seen "Treevenge" have you?

This?

LOL!

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Oregon beats Wyoming 48-14.

Army giving the Trees all they can handle.

Washington is handling Illinois.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 5:28 pm

UCLA won the coin flip and deferred.
Texas decided to kick.

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 5:45 pm

UAEebs86 wrote:UCLA won the coin flip and deferred.
Texas decided to kick.

That isn't something you see very often. Wow

OSUCat · Post by **OSUCat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 6:33 pm

Why is little Jerry playing QB for UCLA?

Sage&Silver · Post by **Sage&Silver** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 6:35 pm

OSUCat wrote:Why is little Jerry playing QB for UCLA?

Hundley has a numb arm, can't hold a football.

Sage&Silver · Post by **Sage&Silver** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 6:39 pm

USC trailing BC at half time.

Trojans have 13 yards on 16 rushing attempts

SCCat · Post by **SCCat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:10 pm

Sage&Silver wrote:USC trailing BC at half time.

Trojans have 13 yards on 16 rushing attempts

USC isn't scary. UCLA isn't scary.

Now we could still lose to both teams, but there doesn't seem to be a dominant team in the south.

devilswin99 · Post by **devilswin99** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:30 pm

Arizona State University = Winning!!!

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:34 pm

USC is in trouble.

Sage&Silver · Post by **Sage&Silver** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:39 pm

devilswin99 wrote:Arizona State University = Winning!!!

...against team with a combined three FBS wins last year.

Five if they can hold off Colorado.

SCCat · Post by **SCCat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:50 pm

Chicat wrote:USC is in trouble.

4 yards rushing on 28 attempts through the early part of the 4th.

Their yards per rush on the box score shows as .1

That's...wow.

[And just for some more perspective, BC has 46 rushes for 343 yards, 7.5 yards per rush

]

azcat49 · Post by **azcat49** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:53 pm

Granted there is s kot b of sea d on left but is anyone thinking the south might be WIDE open

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:54 pm

BC lost last year 35-7 . . . with only 184 yards of offence (101 yards rushing). Times change. . .

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:57 pm

azcat49 wrote:Granted there is s kot b of sea d on left but is anyone thinking the south might be WIDE open

Usually I can decipher your autocorrect and typos, but this one has me stumped.

SCCat · Post by **SCCat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:03 pm

USC put up a quick TD...still need another for the win. 30-24

SCCat · Post by **SCCat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:14 pm

SCCat wrote:USC put up a quick TD...still need another for the win. 30-24

And a very quick TD for BC should probably put that one away.

Nice, nice work USC. Real nice.

SCCat · Post by **SCCat** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:33 pm

So in the loss to BC, UCS gave up 451 rushing yards on 54 attempts for an 8.4 yards per rush average.

Fire your DC on the flight home?

azthrillhouse · Post by **azthrillhouse** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 9:30 pm

Chicat wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Granted there is s kot b of sea d on left but is anyone thinking the south might be WIDE open
Usually I can decipher your autocorrect and typos, but this one has me stumped.

I understood it perfectly, probably because I was thinking the same thing.

Login • Register