Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
ChooChooCat wrote:He meant RR bud.chiefzona wrote:jimson wrote:Yeah? Where's he going?chiefzona wrote:
Boone is the only possible move that I have heard and that is a reach. No matter what happens, it’s irrelevant. RR is gone.
I said that is a reach.
I don't thing Kiffin is realistic. Sumlin maybe but don't think Kiffin is. That 10 year extension was bound to drive that buyout up.PHXCATS wrote:I am curious why you think RR will be gone and when?
I am fully on the bring in Lane Train if RR doesnt get 9 wins no matter what next year. But do you have different ideas?
I don't think there's any way Kiffin would sign that extension if it had a huge increase in the buyout, that just wouldn't make any sense. He already had a 5-year deal I believe (4 remaining). That extension was purely PR for recruiting.btfd16 wrote:I don't thing Kiffin is realistic. Sumlin maybe but don't think Kiffin is. That 10 year extension was bound to drive that buyout up.PHXCATS wrote:I am curious why you think RR will be gone and when?
I am fully on the bring in Lane Train if RR doesnt get 9 wins no matter what next year. But do you have different ideas?
azcat49 wrote:PJ Johnson to AZ as expected. Loved the S&C program and his relationship with Vince Amey. I think the cats have about 12 NLI's in so far in the early period.
you really are a cancer to this programchiefzona wrote:azcat49 wrote:PJ Johnson to AZ as expected. Loved the S&C program and his relationship with Vince Amey. I think the cats have about 12 NLI's in so far in the early period.
Nasty story I heard about him with his Dad.
whatisee wrote:you really are a cancer to this programchiefzona wrote:azcat49 wrote:PJ Johnson to AZ as expected. Loved the S&C program and his relationship with Vince Amey. I think the cats have about 12 NLI's in so far in the early period.
Nasty story I heard about him with his Dad.
No, you said RR is gone, so where is he going?chiefzona wrote:ChooChooCat wrote:He meant RR bud.chiefzona wrote:jimson wrote:Yeah? Where's he going?chiefzona wrote:
Boone is the only possible move that I have heard and that is a reach. No matter what happens, it’s irrelevant. RR is gone.
I said that is a reach.
I think he meant Boone.
A cancer? Well, you can just count on him and a few others to spin every possible thing that RR does into a negative.whatisee wrote:you really are a cancer to this programchiefzona wrote:azcat49 wrote:PJ Johnson to AZ as expected. Loved the S&C program and his relationship with Vince Amey. I think the cats have about 12 NLI's in so far in the early period.
Nasty story I heard about him with his Dad.
Lane will get offered a bigger job than Arizona and he knows it. He's not coming here.prh wrote:I don't think there's any way Kiffin would sign that extension if it had a huge increase in the buyout, that just wouldn't make any sense. He already had a 5-year deal I believe (4 remaining). That extension was purely PR for recruiting.btfd16 wrote:I don't thing Kiffin is realistic. Sumlin maybe but don't think Kiffin is. That 10 year extension was bound to drive that buyout up.PHXCATS wrote:I am curious why you think RR will be gone and when?
I am fully on the bring in Lane Train if RR doesnt get 9 wins no matter what next year. But do you have different ideas?
Honestly, given all the reasons Lane likes FAU, Arizona sounds like a decent destination for him. Power 5 school with no expectations, but nothing structurally that would keep us in the basement (i.e. Vanderbilt, Oregon State, Kansas, Rutgers). Lane could recruit the hell out of UofA (weather, campus, scenery, etc). Arizona gives him a chance to stick it to USC every year, which he'd probably enjoy. And if nothing else, it can be a better stepping stone to a big time job than FAU. I'm not sure that big time programs are ready to give him a chance after one year at FAU. Proving himself somewhere like Arizona would be huge.
I think we all know that this is his last year at Arizona.jimson wrote:chiefzona wrote:ChooChooCat wrote:No, you said RR is gone, so where is he going?chiefzona wrote:[quote="jimson"
I think he meant Boone.
Considering Tennessee didn't offer him nor Arkansas or Kansas or Oregon I am not sure that will necessarily be the case. If UA starts on him early it can happen.ChooChooCat wrote:Lane will get offered a bigger job than Arizona and he knows it. He's not coming here.prh wrote:I don't think there's any way Kiffin would sign that extension if it had a huge increase in the buyout, that just wouldn't make any sense. He already had a 5-year deal I believe (4 remaining). That extension was purely PR for recruiting.btfd16 wrote:I don't thing Kiffin is realistic. Sumlin maybe but don't think Kiffin is. That 10 year extension was bound to drive that buyout up.PHXCATS wrote:I am curious why you think RR will be gone and when?
I am fully on the bring in Lane Train if RR doesnt get 9 wins no matter what next year. But do you have different ideas?
Honestly, given all the reasons Lane likes FAU, Arizona sounds like a decent destination for him. Power 5 school with no expectations, but nothing structurally that would keep us in the basement (i.e. Vanderbilt, Oregon State, Kansas, Rutgers). Lane could recruit the hell out of UofA (weather, campus, scenery, etc). Arizona gives him a chance to stick it to USC every year, which he'd probably enjoy. And if nothing else, it can be a better stepping stone to a big time job than FAU. I'm not sure that big time programs are ready to give him a chance after one year at FAU. Proving himself somewhere like Arizona would be huge.
In 2018, that Will be a different story.PHXCATS wrote:Considering Tennessee didn't offer him nor Arkansas or Kansas or Oregon I am not sure that will necessarily be the case. If UA starts on him early it can happen.ChooChooCat wrote:Lane will get offered a bigger job than Arizona and he knows it. He's not coming here.prh wrote:I don't think there's any way Kiffin would sign that extension if it had a huge increase in the buyout, that just wouldn't make any sense. He already had a 5-year deal I believe (4 remaining). That extension was purely PR for recruiting.btfd16 wrote:I don't thing Kiffin is realistic. Sumlin maybe but don't think Kiffin is. That 10 year extension was bound to drive that buyout up.PHXCATS wrote:I am curious why you think RR will be gone and when?
I am fully on the bring in Lane Train if RR doesnt get 9 wins no matter what next year. But do you have different ideas?
Honestly, given all the reasons Lane likes FAU, Arizona sounds like a decent destination for him. Power 5 school with no expectations, but nothing structurally that would keep us in the basement (i.e. Vanderbilt, Oregon State, Kansas, Rutgers). Lane could recruit the hell out of UofA (weather, campus, scenery, etc). Arizona gives him a chance to stick it to USC every year, which he'd probably enjoy. And if nothing else, it can be a better stepping stone to a big time job than FAU. I'm not sure that big time programs are ready to give him a chance after one year at FAU. Proving himself somewhere like Arizona would be huge.
He's only been at FAU for a year and he won 11 games. It won't take much longer. Plus if he ever took the Arizona job he'd be here for about 2 years as well max, it's what Lane does.PHXCATS wrote:Considering Tennessee didn't offer him nor Arkansas or Kansas or Oregon I am not sure that will necessarily be the case. If UA starts on him early it can happen.ChooChooCat wrote:Lane will get offered a bigger job than Arizona and he knows it. He's not coming here.prh wrote:I don't think there's any way Kiffin would sign that extension if it had a huge increase in the buyout, that just wouldn't make any sense. He already had a 5-year deal I believe (4 remaining). That extension was purely PR for recruiting.btfd16 wrote:I don't thing Kiffin is realistic. Sumlin maybe but don't think Kiffin is. That 10 year extension was bound to drive that buyout up.PHXCATS wrote:I am curious why you think RR will be gone and when?
I am fully on the bring in Lane Train if RR doesnt get 9 wins no matter what next year. But do you have different ideas?
Honestly, given all the reasons Lane likes FAU, Arizona sounds like a decent destination for him. Power 5 school with no expectations, but nothing structurally that would keep us in the basement (i.e. Vanderbilt, Oregon State, Kansas, Rutgers). Lane could recruit the hell out of UofA (weather, campus, scenery, etc). Arizona gives him a chance to stick it to USC every year, which he'd probably enjoy. And if nothing else, it can be a better stepping stone to a big time job than FAU. I'm not sure that big time programs are ready to give him a chance after one year at FAU. Proving himself somewhere like Arizona would be huge.
He's only been at FAU for a year and he won 11 games. It won't take much longer. Plus if he ever took the Arizona job he'd be here for about 2 years as well max, it's what Lane does.[/quote]PHXCATS wrote:Considering Tennessee didn't offer him nor Arkansas or Kansas or Oregon I am not sure that will necessarily be the case. If UA starts on him early it can happen.ChooChooCat wrote:Lane will get offered a bigger job than Arizona and he knows it. He's not coming here.prh wrote:I don't think there's any way Kiffin would sign that extension if it had a huge increase in the buyout, that just wouldn't make any sense. He already had a 5-year deal I believe (4 remaining). That extension was purely PR for recruiting.btfd16 wrote:I don't thing Kiffin is realistic. Sumlin maybe but don't think Kiffin is. That 10 year extension was bound to drive that buyout up.PHXCATS wrote:I am curious why you think RR will be gone and when?
I am fully on the bring in Lane Train if RR doesnt get 9 wins no matter what next year. But do you have different ideas?
Honestly, given all the reasons Lane likes FAU, Arizona sounds like a decent destination for him. Power 5 school with no expectations, but nothing structurally that would keep us in the basement (i.e. Vanderbilt, Oregon State, Kansas, Rutgers). Lane could recruit the hell out of UofA (weather, campus, scenery, etc). Arizona gives him a chance to stick it to USC every year, which he'd probably enjoy. And if nothing else, it can be a better stepping stone to a big time job than FAU. I'm not sure that big time programs are ready to give him a chance after one year at FAU. Proving himself somewhere like Arizona would be huge.
We'll see, I'd love to have him, but I just think he's destined for greener pastures.PHXCATS wrote:
I don't think you are gonna find a hot name that won't leave after a few years.
Also Lane has an act that won't work well at big time football schools. UA could use his act
You don't know this at allchiefzona wrote:I think we all know that this is his last year at Arizona.jimson wrote:chiefzona wrote:ChooChooCat wrote:No, you said RR is gone, so where is he going?chiefzona wrote:[quote="jimson"
I think he meant Boone.
Unless attendance is so bad the athletic department loses money on the season....again.btfd16 wrote:
You don't know this at all
Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
You think they fire a guy after winning nine games because of attendance? If we can't fill the stadium with a successful season and preseason Heisman contender then that is our own fault.ChooChooCat wrote:Unless attendance is so bad the athletic department loses money on the season....again.btfd16 wrote:
You don't know this at all
Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
If Tate stays healthy, and does well, then why would Tate stay? A body can only take so much pounding. If if Tate goes, then why would RichRod stay?btfd16 wrote: Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
Maybe because there is someone else on the team he is fairly close with... Like his son.Merkin wrote:If Tate stays healthy, and does well, then why would Tate stay? A body can only take so much pounding. If if Tate goes, then why would RichRod stay?btfd16 wrote: Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
After this next season he'd have one year remaining on his contract. You either have to A. Extend him for another 4 years where you tie your hands completely to him with whatever buyout (always overpriced) and continue to have another line of years where you lose money on football (since fans couldn't be bothered to show up for a 9 win team led by a Heisman candidate) or B. You let him go, move on, rally around a "new fresh start" with a new coach who has a brand new indoor facility and vision to sell to recruits who can promise day in and day out that he can get us to the Rose Bowl and yada yada yada. Technically there is a C. option as well where you leave RR as head coach to coach the final year of his contract where you'll for sure have a shit recruiting class because there's no guarantee he's the coach the following season and fans will once again remain apathetic and you'll for sure lose money on the season again.btfd16 wrote:You think they fire a guy after winning nine games because of attendance? If we can't fill the stadium with a successful season and preseason Heisman contender then that is our own fault.ChooChooCat wrote:Unless attendance is so bad the athletic department loses money on the season....again.btfd16 wrote:
You don't know this at all
Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
If the fans drive a winner out of town because he flirted with South Carolina (a step up) while giving Miller a total pass on Maryland (step down) then that is 100% patheticChooChooCat wrote:Unless attendance is so bad the athletic department loses money on the season....again.btfd16 wrote:
You don't know this at all
Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
Tate does not have NFL game. No way he gets drafted in the first 5 or 6 rounds no matter what.Merkin wrote:If Tate stays healthy, and does well, then why would Tate stay? A body can only take so much pounding. If if Tate goes, then why would RichRod stay?btfd16 wrote: Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
16-15PHXCATS wrote:If the fans drive a winner out of town because he flirted with South Carolina (a step up) while giving Miller a total pass on Maryland (step down) then that is 100% patheticChooChooCat wrote:Unless attendance is so bad the athletic department loses money on the season....again.btfd16 wrote:
You don't know this at all
Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
PHXCATS wrote:Tate does not have NFL game. No way he gets drafted in the first 5 or 6 rounds no matter what.Merkin wrote:If Tate stays healthy, and does well, then why would Tate stay? A body can only take so much pounding. If if Tate goes, then why would RichRod stay?btfd16 wrote: Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
Heisman winners have gone undrafted before
He has to pay for numerous projects. You can't expect him to let a normal source of revenue continue to be a drain on the athletic department and put us further into debt with zero hope of paying for anything do you? The man runs a damn business, he has to make money in the places he's supposed to i.e. basketball and football. If he doesn't then football will always remain mediocre at best and basketball will suffer, because it'll have to pay for fricken football now too. If he allows RR to stay and the attendance numbers are still falling short 15K of capacity I'd put that on Heeke more than RR.btfd16 wrote:Do you honestly believe we fire a guy if he wins 9 games because of attendance? I put that more on Heeke than RR.
I can pretty much say with confidence that if we're winning 8 and 9 games and we have a Heisman candidate and the attendance is still down. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with the coach. This has been hashed over anyway. The polls and discussion groups have all pointed to other reasons.ChooChooCat wrote:He has to pay for numerous projects. You can't expect him to let a normal source of revenue continue to be a drain on the athletic department and put us further into debt with zero hope of paying for anything do you? The man runs a damn business, he has to make money in the places he's supposed to i.e. basketball and football. If he doesn't then football will always remain mediocre at best and basketball will suffer, because it'll have to pay for fricken football now too. If he allows RR to stay and the attendance numbers are still falling short 15K of capacity I'd put that on Heeke more than RR.btfd16 wrote:Do you honestly believe we fire a guy if he wins 9 games because of attendance? I put that more on Heeke than RR.
You have to at least try to turn things around and doing the same god damn thing with the same god leadership is lunacy. I've mentioned it before that Arizona leads the conference in basketball, baseball, and softball attendance. The passion is there in Tucson for the University let's not act as if it's not (student body issues not withstanding of course). 7-8 win seasons with the same guy that nobody seems to like who continues to recruit all 3 star recruiting classes isn't going to make more people show up. If RR made less money then it's something the Athletic Department could stomach, but he gets paid a shit ton especially based on the overall results he provides. You can't extend him and pay him more for the same results with the attendance being where it's at you just can't, whether you think he's the root cause of attendance issues or not.tgrumpy2 wrote:I can pretty much say with confidence that if we're winning 8 and 9 games and we have a Heisman candidate and the attendance is still down. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with the coach. This has been hashed over anyway. The polls and discussion groups have all pointed to other reasons.ChooChooCat wrote:He has to pay for numerous projects. You can't expect him to let a normal source of revenue continue to be a drain on the athletic department and put us further into debt with zero hope of paying for anything do you? The man runs a damn business, he has to make money in the places he's supposed to i.e. basketball and football. If he doesn't then football will always remain mediocre at best and basketball will suffer, because it'll have to pay for fricken football now too. If he allows RR to stay and the attendance numbers are still falling short 15K of capacity I'd put that on Heeke more than RR.btfd16 wrote:Do you honestly believe we fire a guy if he wins 9 games because of attendance? I put that more on Heeke than RR.
I can't tell you a single person I know that their make-or-break reason to go to a football game is who is coaching the game (except Chief). It's game experience and convenience. Basketball is easy and shorter games, plus were good. Baseball is nice stadium, you can sit down and relax, and you can drink beer (only reason majority of us students went). Softball is right on campus, you can sit and relax the whole game, and easy to get in and out with minimal traffic (mostly adults, I don't know many people who went to a single softball game). Football is a nightmare.ChooChooCat wrote:You have to at least try to turn things around and doing the same god damn thing with the same god leadership is lunacy. I've mentioned it before that Arizona leads the conference in basketball, baseball, and softball attendance. The passion is there in Tucson for the University let's not act as if it's not (student body issues not withstanding of course). 7-8 win seasons with the same guy that nobody seems to like who continues to recruit all 3 star recruiting classes isn't going to make more people show up. If RR made less money then it's something the Athletic Department could stomach, but he gets paid a shit ton especially based on the overall results he provides. You can't extend him and pay him more for the same results with the attendance being where it's at you just can't, whether you think he's the root cause of attendance issues or not.tgrumpy2 wrote:I can pretty much say with confidence that if we're winning 8 and 9 games and we have a Heisman candidate and the attendance is still down. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with the coach. This has been hashed over anyway. The polls and discussion groups have all pointed to other reasons.ChooChooCat wrote:He has to pay for numerous projects. You can't expect him to let a normal source of revenue continue to be a drain on the athletic department and put us further into debt with zero hope of paying for anything do you? The man runs a damn business, he has to make money in the places he's supposed to i.e. basketball and football. If he doesn't then football will always remain mediocre at best and basketball will suffer, because it'll have to pay for fricken football now too. If he allows RR to stay and the attendance numbers are still falling short 15K of capacity I'd put that on Heeke more than RR.btfd16 wrote:Do you honestly believe we fire a guy if he wins 9 games because of attendance? I put that more on Heeke than RR.
Believe me I understand the dynamics that come with attending football games right now, but you have to attempt to flip that around. All my points still stand and you've got to stop blaming the fans for the entirety of this situation. If you can have great attendance when Mike Stoops is your coach you can do it again.btfd16 wrote:I can't tell you a single person I know that their make-or-break reason to go to a football game is who is coaching the game (except Chief). It's game experience and convenience. Basketball is easy and shorter games, plus were good. Baseball is nice stadium, you can sit down and relax, and you can drink beer (only reason majority of us students went). Softball is right on campus, you can sit and relax the whole game, and easy to get in and out with minimal traffic (mostly adults, I don't know many people who went to a single softball game). Football is a nightmare.ChooChooCat wrote:You have to at least try to turn things around and doing the same god damn thing with the same god leadership is lunacy. I've mentioned it before that Arizona leads the conference in basketball, baseball, and softball attendance. The passion is there in Tucson for the University let's not act as if it's not (student body issues not withstanding of course). 7-8 win seasons with the same guy that nobody seems to like who continues to recruit all 3 star recruiting classes isn't going to make more people show up. If RR made less money then it's something the Athletic Department could stomach, but he gets paid a shit ton especially based on the overall results he provides. You can't extend him and pay him more for the same results with the attendance being where it's at you just can't, whether you think he's the root cause of attendance issues or not.tgrumpy2 wrote:I can pretty much say with confidence that if we're winning 8 and 9 games and we have a Heisman candidate and the attendance is still down. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with the coach. This has been hashed over anyway. The polls and discussion groups have all pointed to other reasons.ChooChooCat wrote:He has to pay for numerous projects. You can't expect him to let a normal source of revenue continue to be a drain on the athletic department and put us further into debt with zero hope of paying for anything do you? The man runs a damn business, he has to make money in the places he's supposed to i.e. basketball and football. If he doesn't then football will always remain mediocre at best and basketball will suffer, because it'll have to pay for fricken football now too. If he allows RR to stay and the attendance numbers are still falling short 15K of capacity I'd put that on Heeke more than RR.btfd16 wrote:Do you honestly believe we fire a guy if he wins 9 games because of attendance? I put that more on Heeke than RR.
sure and hang the recruiting banner next to all of Miller's final four ones.ChooChooCat wrote:16-15PHXCATS wrote:If the fans drive a winner out of town because he flirted with South Carolina (a step up) while giving Miller a total pass on Maryland (step down) then that is 100% patheticChooChooCat wrote:Unless attendance is so bad the athletic department loses money on the season....again.btfd16 wrote:
You don't know this at all
Khalil stays healthy and does well, wins 9 games, he isn't going anywhere and you know it.
30-8
23-12
27-8
33-5
34-4
25-9
32-5
vs
8-5
8-5
10-4
7-6
3-9
7-5
One of these things is not like the other....
Should I compare recruiting classes while I'm at it?
PHXCATS wrote: sure and hang the recruiting banner next to all of Miller's final four ones.
good riddance. with your ridiculous takes and shit attitude toward other fans that you grade and want to feel "lesser" than you. don't need your kind of "fandom" around the program that we all want to succeed anyway.UALoco wrote:If a fanbase doesn't show up for an Arizona Football Team that wins 9, I don't think I want to count myself a member of that fanbase. I want to be part of something bigger and better than that.
That would free up time in 2020 to start hitting the Raider games in Vegas. Maybe reconsider Cardinal season tickets.
I love me some Wildcat Football but that level of apathy plus the vitriol on this board may just put me over the edge.
I only have a shit attitude towards you scumdevil.scumdevils86 wrote:good riddance. with your ridiculous takes and shit attitude toward other fans that you grade and want to feel "lesser" than you. don't need your kind of "fandom" around the program that we all want to succeed anyway.UALoco wrote:If a fanbase doesn't show up for an Arizona Football Team that wins 9, I don't think I want to count myself a member of that fanbase. I want to be part of something bigger and better than that.
That would free up time in 2020 to start hitting the Raider games in Vegas. Maybe reconsider Cardinal season tickets.
I love me some Wildcat Football but that level of apathy plus the vitriol on this board may just put me over the edge.
No it's a pretty shit attitude toward the program and anything you think is beneath you. It's you.UALoco wrote:I only have a shit attitude towards you scumdevil.scumdevils86 wrote:good riddance. with your ridiculous takes and shit attitude toward other fans that you grade and want to feel "lesser" than you. don't need your kind of "fandom" around the program that we all want to succeed anyway.UALoco wrote:If a fanbase doesn't show up for an Arizona Football Team that wins 9, I don't think I want to count myself a member of that fanbase. I want to be part of something bigger and better than that.
That would free up time in 2020 to start hitting the Raider games in Vegas. Maybe reconsider Cardinal season tickets.
I love me some Wildcat Football but that level of apathy plus the vitriol on this board may just put me over the edge.
Oh, I forgot about you Hater..I have a shit attitude towards you too.ASUHATER! wrote:No it's a pretty shit attitude toward the program and anything you think is beneath you. It's you.UALoco wrote:I only have a shit attitude towards you scumdevil.scumdevils86 wrote:good riddance. with your ridiculous takes and shit attitude toward other fans that you grade and want to feel "lesser" than you. don't need your kind of "fandom" around the program that we all want to succeed anyway.UALoco wrote:If a fanbase doesn't show up for an Arizona Football Team that wins 9, I don't think I want to count myself a member of that fanbase. I want to be part of something bigger and better than that.
That would free up time in 2020 to start hitting the Raider games in Vegas. Maybe reconsider Cardinal season tickets.
I love me some Wildcat Football but that level of apathy plus the vitriol on this board may just put me over the edge.
This is not saying anyone is a better or worse fan but it find it incredibly funny that people who dont go to games are crapping on the fans who doUALoco wrote:Oh, I forgot about you Hater..I have a shit attitude towards you too.ASUHATER! wrote:No it's a pretty shit attitude toward the program and anything you think is beneath you. It's you.UALoco wrote:I only have a shit attitude towards you scumdevil.scumdevils86 wrote:good riddance. with your ridiculous takes and shit attitude toward other fans that you grade and want to feel "lesser" than you. don't need your kind of "fandom" around the program that we all want to succeed anyway.UALoco wrote:If a fanbase doesn't show up for an Arizona Football Team that wins 9, I don't think I want to count myself a member of that fanbase. I want to be part of something bigger and better than that.
That would free up time in 2020 to start hitting the Raider games in Vegas. Maybe reconsider Cardinal season tickets.
I love me some Wildcat Football but that level of apathy plus the vitriol on this board may just put me over the edge.
I love the program..sad it has so may albatross fans like you two. BearDown Cabrones.
You're absolutely the worst kind of fan.UALoco wrote:Oh, I forgot about you Hater..I have a shit attitude towards you too.ASUHATER! wrote:No it's a pretty shit attitude toward the program and anything you think is beneath you. It's you.UALoco wrote:I only have a shit attitude towards you scumdevil.scumdevils86 wrote:good riddance. with your ridiculous takes and shit attitude toward other fans that you grade and want to feel "lesser" than you. don't need your kind of "fandom" around the program that we all want to succeed anyway.UALoco wrote:If a fanbase doesn't show up for an Arizona Football Team that wins 9, I don't think I want to count myself a member of that fanbase. I want to be part of something bigger and better than that.
That would free up time in 2020 to start hitting the Raider games in Vegas. Maybe reconsider Cardinal season tickets.
I love me some Wildcat Football but that level of apathy plus the vitriol on this board may just put me over the edge.
I love the program..sad it has so may albatross fans like you two. BearDown Cabrones.
tgrumpy2 wrote:You people need to go back and look at football attendance. When we win, people come to the games. When we lose, they don't. It always lags a year. We lost last year and people didn't show up this year. We won this year and attendance will pick up. If we keep winning next year I expect it will even get better. For people to sit back and say its all because of a coach they don't like, I'm not buying it. The bottom line is win.
yea and who else has taken us to a P12 South championship and five bowl games in six years. I'll say it again, I don't think the fans as a whole care what the conference record is. If we're winning they'll be watching. You can sit there and stir your shit pot all you want but the truth is what it is.chiefzona wrote:tgrumpy2 wrote:You people need to go back and look at football attendance. When we win, people come to the games. When we lose, they don't. It always lags a year. We lost last year and people didn't show up this year. We won this year and attendance will pick up. If we keep winning next year I expect it will even get better. For people to sit back and say its all because of a coach they don't like, I'm not buying it. The bottom line is win.
Isn’t winning on the coach? 24-30 Conference record.
tgrumpy2 wrote:yea and who else has taken us to a P12 South championship and five bowl games in six years. I'll say it again, I don't think the fans as a whole care what the conference record is. If we're winning they'll be watching. You can sit there and stir your shit pot all you want but the truth is what it is.chiefzona wrote:tgrumpy2 wrote:You people need to go back and look at football attendance. When we win, people come to the games. When we lose, they don't. It always lags a year. We lost last year and people didn't show up this year. We won this year and attendance will pick up. If we keep winning next year I expect it will even get better. For people to sit back and say its all because of a coach they don't like, I'm not buying it. The bottom line is win.
Isn’t winning on the coach? 24-30 Conference record.
