I hope Miller can pull it off. I'll wait to see if Brown visits before I get too excited. Would be magic if he lands b-will and BrownChooChooCat wrote:The read I'm getting on Williams is that Arizona sold him and his family so damn well on playing alongside another PG that he pretty much prefers it at this point. He will have that situation at Oregon, Gonzaga, and from what it looks like Arizona as well. I'm not sure any school has a perceived edge at this point regardless whatever Oregon insiders believe. We'll know soon enough thankfully.EVCat wrote:ChooChoo...any talk at all about Williams or, to a crazier extent, Brown?
It seems the chatter has started to subside, but that might just be because there is nothing to talk about. Again, I don't begrudge BW doing this...he was with us even with a 5* Quinnerly, and was with us early, and all of this of course caused him to consider looking, and that looking will be 4 months, maybe, when most recruits are much longer for the game. Timing sucks, but I still think we have the most attractive situation for him. We can win with one or two pieces, we have no established PG in front of him for 1 (zags) or 2 (ducks) years...but how much has his relationship with Sean been hurt, if at all, and was he close to Book at all?
Brown? That seems like a longshot, but so did fielding a team of more than 7 this year.
I have to think that maybe a humble Sean Miller, or at least a Sean Miller who already could close who can now sell a "humble" narrative...is a more potent Sean Miller?
On Brown, Arizona has done very well here, but I don't know if it's enough. It looks like Stanford is out at the moment and it's probably a 3 school race. Arizona has to get him on campus with that last official visit and if it does it probably has a great shot. This will go into May before it's done.
let's talk '18
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Re: let's talk '18
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
I'm making the pitch for Gonzaga, or for why Williams might choose Gonzaga. Maybe that's to get ahead of any eventual heartbreak in this recruitment. But it's certainly not a prognostication.EVCat wrote:YoDeFoe wrote:An update in the Brandon Williams saga...
Gonzaga starting PG Josh Perkins just had shoulder surgery last week... which means that for the next six months there's a wide open hole at starting PG for the Zags. Official practice begins around September 25, 2018 for the coming season... which is about five months from now.
Perkins should be back at full strength by the time the season starts, but the risk that he might not return to 100% and the opportunity for Williams to run the team over the summer and in early practices without Perkins breathing down his neck might make Gonzaga an even more appealing option than before.
I'd previously stated that I liked Gonzaga as an option for Williams given that he'd play off ball in his first season and would move to PG as a sophomore following the graduation of Perkins. Now there is an opportunity for Williams to step in as the day one starting PG for the Zags.
Just another wrinkle in a complicated decision.
This seems more like wishful thinking. Even if there is some time early, Perkins is a 3 year starter and will be taking the offense back from a freshman, even BW. BW is a very good freshman, but he is not a superstar One and Done lock who is going to unseat the best player with 3 years experience. And off ball speculation is the whole point of why BW might re-commit here...he wants to be the point. Like there were much better suitors for Khalil Tate in football, but we got him because...QB. BW wants...PG. He can play SG a lot of places.
He may go to Gonzaga. But I really think it is a battle between the lure of the super-class and Oregon and knowing he might sit vs the issues at Arizona but likely playing time in bunches/starter minutes and, in the end, little actual sanction that affects him. This reads like a writer trying to talk him into coming to Gonzaga, not an actual prognostication. The "opportunity to step in from day 1 at PG" is fools gold, because it might be over on day 20 or whenever Perkins comes back. "Step in from Day 1" generally infers finishing...
I don't do recruiting forecasts - rightfully you've asked Choo to step in for that task.
And FWIW - I think it will take wishful thinking for Williams to see great opportunity at any of the three schools. He has to hope that Arizona escapes meaningful sanctions and that unproven players elevate their game. He has to hope to beat out a collection of similarly ranked guards for both of his two years at Oregon, and that Pritchard shares the lead guard duties. And he has to hope that Gonzaga puts the ball in his hands this season despite owning an exceptional senior PG.
- RichardCranium
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:53 pm
- Reputation: 180
- Location: The Wonderful Land Of Oz
Re: let's talk '18
Sorry to pick at a scab, but WTF is "SJW"?
Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook.
Re: let's talk '18
"Social Justice Warrior"RichardCranium wrote:Sorry to pick at a scab, but WTF is "SJW"?
For some reason right wing nut jobs think it is some sort of derogatory term they can use to sneer at liberals and progressives for caring about other people. It is part of the alpha/beta/cuck language group. I personally don't see how being called a warrior for social justice is a bad thing at all.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
Re: let's talk '18
well it's pretty obvious that they use it as a way to say that certain people are making a cause/conflict out of something that doesn't deserve it.ASUHATER! wrote:"Social Justice Warrior"RichardCranium wrote:Sorry to pick at a scab, but WTF is "SJW"?
For some reason right wing nut jobs think it is some sort of derogatory term they can use to sneer at liberals and progressives for caring about other people. It is part of the alpha/beta/cuck language group. I personally don't see how being called a warrior for social justice is a bad thing at all.
Re: let's talk '18
Yeah causes like equal rights for women and LGBT people and minorities and advocating for less racism and similar things. They can't stand things like that.SunnyAZ wrote:well it's pretty obvious that they use it as a way to say that certain people are making a cause/conflict out of something that doesn't deserve it.ASUHATER! wrote:"Social Justice Warrior"RichardCranium wrote:Sorry to pick at a scab, but WTF is "SJW"?
For some reason right wing nut jobs think it is some sort of derogatory term they can use to sneer at liberals and progressives for caring about other people. It is part of the alpha/beta/cuck language group. I personally don't see how being called a warrior for social justice is a bad thing at all.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: let's talk '18
Fellas.... let's get this discussion back on topic please.
When is BW announcing that he will become a Wildcat?
When is BW announcing that he will become a Wildcat?
- dovecanyoncat
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
- Reputation: 2144
- Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts
Re: let's talk '18
You mean we mustn't conjugate nutjob nomenclature in respect of possible meanings for BW?Alieberman wrote:Fellas.... let's get this discussion back on topic please.
When is BW announcing that he will become a Wildcat?
Killjoy.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
~ Wilhoit's Law
~ Wilhoit's Law
Re: let's talk '18
Lol you are either dealing with trolls or silly people. I would advise not concerning yourself with them.ASUHATER! wrote:Yeah causes like equal rights for women and LGBT people and minorities and advocating for less racism and similar things. They can't stand things like that.SunnyAZ wrote:well it's pretty obvious that they use it as a way to say that certain people are making a cause/conflict out of something that doesn't deserve it.ASUHATER! wrote:"Social Justice Warrior"RichardCranium wrote:Sorry to pick at a scab, but WTF is "SJW"?
For some reason right wing nut jobs think it is some sort of derogatory term they can use to sneer at liberals and progressives for caring about other people. It is part of the alpha/beta/cuck language group. I personally don't see how being called a warrior for social justice is a bad thing at all.
I'm talking about people that get mad at that teacher for going to school on the 'white people day of absence so we can appreciate people of color' day. And the Google guy who wrote that essay saying there are reasons a disproportionate number of women and men are involved in tech, and even included a list of ways to reach women. Stuff like that.
Re: let's talk '18
30thAlieberman wrote:Fellas.... let's get this discussion back on topic please.
When is BW announcing that he will become a Wildcat?
Book it.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
Repping
Re: let's talk '18
Thank youAlieberman wrote:Fellas.... let's get this discussion back on topic please.
When is BW announcing that he will become a Wildcat?
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
-
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
- Reputation: 1180
Re: let's talk '18
Justin Coleman is on campus today btw.
Re: let's talk '18
Wish you didnt say bookSunnyAZ wrote:30thAlieberman wrote:Fellas.... let's get this discussion back on topic please.
When is BW announcing that he will become a Wildcat?
Book it.
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
Coleman is visiting Arizona and also considering Saint Louis, UAB, Texas Southern, Northern Kentucky and SMU. One of those things is not like the others.ChooChooCat wrote:Justin Coleman is on campus today btw.
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: let's talk '18
How favorably does JC compare to other transfer PGs we've had?YoDeFoe wrote:Coleman is visiting Arizona and also considering Saint Louis, UAB, Texas Southern, Northern Kentucky and SMU. One of those things is not like the others.ChooChooCat wrote:Justin Coleman is on campus today btw.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: let's talk '18
Not very. Hopefully serviceable.Beachcat97 wrote:How favorably does JC compare to other transfer PGs we've had?YoDeFoe wrote:Coleman is visiting Arizona and also considering Saint Louis, UAB, Texas Southern, Northern Kentucky and SMU. One of those things is not like the others.ChooChooCat wrote:Justin Coleman is on campus today btw.
- Merkin
- Posts: 43424
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: let's talk '18
Spiff, being that the last 2 transfers TJ McConnell and Kadeem Allen are in the NBA, would you say that Coleman is Arizona good?
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
My previous thoughts on Coleman. I was probably too harsh calling him a poor man's PJC. He's probably just PJC.YoDeFoe wrote:Basically the exact same shooting splits and scoring style, with PJC being a 5 percentage point better three point shooter and Coleman being a 5 percentage point better finisher at the rim and at the line.ChooChooCat wrote:Based on what exactly?YoDeFoe wrote:and Coleman is very much a poor man's PJC.
Same size, both 5'10" 170lbs.
Both posted about .90 points per possession scoring and 1.4ppp scoring + assists, both with ~2.4 A:TO. Similar offensive rating (Coleman v PJC). Coleman was a higher usage offensive player, for what its worth.
But oh boy - defensive rating.
PJC held opponents to a decent 0.869ppp, good for about 50th percentile. Coleman gave up 1.051ppp - which is in the bottom 10% of players in division 1 basketball. In man to man defensive sets, Coleman ranked in the bottom 5%.
All of the above is with PJC playing for Arizona with a top 50 strength of schedule and Coleman playing for Samford - just outside the top 200 in SOS.
Samford was one of the worst defensive teams in the country last year (346th of 351) and defense is a team effort. But when Coleman was isolated, he ranked in the bottom 4%. When Coleman was tasked with defending catch and shoot jumpers, he ranked in the bottom 15%. Those are individual defensive plays.
So he's PJC on offense and probably a shadow of PJC on defense. Is that the solution we're looking for?
Last edited by YoDeFoe on Wed Apr 25, 2018 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
Choo's previous thoughts on Coleman.ChooChooCat wrote:So to sum it up Coleman is better in the P&R, Isolation, and Hand off. They both suck in transition i.e. they're both short, and Parker was a better spot up shooter (the only thing he ever did good on offense). As far as defense goes Samford obviously gave zero shits about playing any, so I don't take it too seriously. Regardless our defense is in the hands of our wings and that goes for even if we land Williams. If the wings can't play D effectively then we're screwed already, so I couldn't care less about his defense at a program who had zero interest in playing any. The same size argument is crap, Parker was never 5'10. Hell the way Arizona lists heights I bet we list Coleman at 6'0 if he were to come here.
Either way we need him or Williams. You don't go into next season with Alex Barcello who played sparingly being your sole option at the 1. I'm in agreement with you overall on Johnson, but we need somebody to handle the rock.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: let's talk '18
YDF and Choo have good takes, IMO. Comparing him to others:Merkin wrote:Spiff, being that the last 2 transfers TJ McConnell and Kadeem Allen are in the NBA, would you say that Coleman is Arizona good?
Best case scenario: Mark Lyons.
Worst case scenario: PG version of Mark Tollefsen.
I think he winds up being a starter by default and we wind up wishing he was better than he actually is. Maybe he can be solid, hopefully it's enough for a tournament. The awful defensive stats concern me the most.
Re: let's talk '18
Coleman is ours
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: let's talk '18
Source?CatHoops wrote:Coleman is ours
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
I've come around to "this is fine" on Coleman. He's PJC.
* Given our current situation, would I take another year of PJC? Yep.
* Does taking Coleman hurt us in getting Williams? Nope.
* If Barcello or Akot is good enough will he earn the start? Yep.
It's fine. I'd honestly rather take the chance and possibly crash and burn with Barcello + Akot at point if we miss on Williams but I realize that's not our program.
* Given our current situation, would I take another year of PJC? Yep.
* Does taking Coleman hurt us in getting Williams? Nope.
* If Barcello or Akot is good enough will he earn the start? Yep.
It's fine. I'd honestly rather take the chance and possibly crash and burn with Barcello + Akot at point if we miss on Williams but I realize that's not our program.
Last edited by YoDeFoe on Wed Apr 25, 2018 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: let's talk '18
By this time next week, BW could be committed to AZ. And our prospects for '19 will rise considerably.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
Source?Beachcat97 wrote:By this time next week, BW could be committed to AZ. And our prospects for '19 will rise considerably.
-
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:21 pm
- Reputation: 1
Re: let's talk '18
We'll need Coleman in case Barcello and Akot can't handle the ball and/or run the offense effectively. Right now BW is mostly a scorer. He averaged 2.9 assists to 2.7 turnovers this HS season.
-
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
- Reputation: 1180
Re: let's talk '18
I wouldn't look too much into this past year's HS stats. His team didn't have anybody else that could really score, so he was pretty much demanded to be the team's offense. I will concede that he's probably more of a shoot first PG at this point.TatetheGreat wrote:We'll need Coleman in case Barcello and Akot can't handle the ball and/or run the offense effectively. Right now BW is mostly a scorer. He averaged 2.9 assists to 2.7 turnovers this HS season.
Either way fwiw with or without BW I'd expect Arizona to take two point guards this class.
- FreeSpiritCat
- Posts: 4572
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:22 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: Lebanon, New Hampshire
Re: let's talk '18
Agree with this take. High scool stats are very misleading. The level of play is a huge jump from high school to college. The competition in AAU may help with plaing more talented individuals but still isn’t played at a DI college level. As an example, Barcello was a good high school player but is having problems adjusting to college. There may be stars in front of the recruits name, but ultimately, all bets are off until we can see how the freshman adjusts to the college level of play.ChooChooCat wrote:I wouldn't look too much into this past year's HS stats. His team didn't have anybody else that could really score, so he was pretty much demanded to be the team's offense. I will concede that he's probably more of a shoot first PG at this point.TatetheGreat wrote:We'll need Coleman in case Barcello and Akot can't handle the ball and/or run the offense effectively. Right now BW is mostly a scorer. He averaged 2.9 assists to 2.7 turnovers this HS season.
Either way fwiw with or without BW I'd expect Arizona to take two point guards this class.
IMO, what is just as important as talent, is the ability and desire of the player to develop. What good is talent if it isn’t being used properly?
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:49 am
- Reputation: 33
Re: let's talk '18
Interesting. If not Bwill, who could the 2nd PG be (assuming Coleman commits)? Looking international maybe? Grad transfer obviously a possibility but doesn't seem to be a ton of options that we're linked to.ChooChooCat wrote:I wouldn't look too much into this past year's HS stats. His team didn't have anybody else that could really score, so he was pretty much demanded to be the team's offense. I will concede that he's probably more of a shoot first PG at this point.TatetheGreat wrote:We'll need Coleman in case Barcello and Akot can't handle the ball and/or run the offense effectively. Right now BW is mostly a scorer. He averaged 2.9 assists to 2.7 turnovers this HS season.
Either way fwiw with or without BW I'd expect Arizona to take two point guards this class.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: let's talk '18
Who does #2 play for?ChooChooCat wrote:I wouldn't look too much into this past year's HS stats. His team didn't have anybody else that could really score, so he was pretty much demanded to be the team's offense. I will concede that he's probably more of a shoot first PG at this point.TatetheGreat wrote:We'll need Coleman in case Barcello and Akot can't handle the ball and/or run the offense effectively. Right now BW is mostly a scorer. He averaged 2.9 assists to 2.7 turnovers this HS season.
Either way fwiw with or without BW I'd expect Arizona to take two point guards this class.
I assume Coleman is #1.
-
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
- Reputation: 1180
Re: let's talk '18
I can't name names and you will only hear of the guy if Williams goes elsewhere. Even if I told you his name you very very likely never would've heard of him and that's certainly not a shot at you my man. He's not a grad transfer though.goslingswagg wrote:Interesting. If not Bwill, who could the 2nd PG be (assuming Coleman commits)? Looking international maybe? Grad transfer obviously a possibility but doesn't seem to be a ton of options that we're linked to.ChooChooCat wrote:I wouldn't look too much into this past year's HS stats. His team didn't have anybody else that could really score, so he was pretty much demanded to be the team's offense. I will concede that he's probably more of a shoot first PG at this point.TatetheGreat wrote:We'll need Coleman in case Barcello and Akot can't handle the ball and/or run the offense effectively. Right now BW is mostly a scorer. He averaged 2.9 assists to 2.7 turnovers this HS season.
Either way fwiw with or without BW I'd expect Arizona to take two point guards this class.
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:49 am
- Reputation: 33
Re: let's talk '18
Would think that means Juco or International?...interesting. Appreciate the insight Choo.ChooChooCat wrote:I can't name names and you will only hear of the guy if Williams goes elsewhere. Even if I told you his name you very very likely never would've heard of him and that's certainly not a shot at you my man. He's not a grad transfer though.goslingswagg wrote:Interesting. If not Bwill, who could the 2nd PG be (assuming Coleman commits)? Looking international maybe? Grad transfer obviously a possibility but doesn't seem to be a ton of options that we're linked to.ChooChooCat wrote:I wouldn't look too much into this past year's HS stats. His team didn't have anybody else that could really score, so he was pretty much demanded to be the team's offense. I will concede that he's probably more of a shoot first PG at this point.TatetheGreat wrote:We'll need Coleman in case Barcello and Akot can't handle the ball and/or run the offense effectively. Right now BW is mostly a scorer. He averaged 2.9 assists to 2.7 turnovers this HS season.
Either way fwiw with or without BW I'd expect Arizona to take two point guards this class.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: let's talk '18
Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
Re: let's talk '18
Miller will most likely be at Williams home on Sunday after his Gonzaga visit.YoDeFoe wrote:Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: let's talk '18
The Witch about to put in work.Irish27 wrote:Miller will most likely be at Williams home on Sunday after his Gonzaga visit.YoDeFoe wrote:Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
Re: let's talk '18
Miller should go on the Gonzaga visit with him and point out everything that's better at Arizona.Irish27 wrote:Miller will most likely be at Williams home on Sunday after his Gonzaga visit.YoDeFoe wrote:Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
Re: let's talk '18
Yes please!!!azgreg wrote:Miller should go on the Gonzaga visit with him and point out everything that's better at Arizona.Irish27 wrote:Miller will most likely be at Williams home on Sunday after his Gonzaga visit.YoDeFoe wrote:Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: let's talk '18
The more chances Miller gets, the better I feel. Williams was with us before the outside shit hit the fan. I doubt it would have been like that unless his relationship with Miller was solid. Every visit is a chance to show him the path forwards from the weirdness.Irish27 wrote:Miller will most likely be at Williams home on Sunday after his Gonzaga visit.YoDeFoe wrote:Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
- Merkin
- Posts: 43424
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: let's talk '18
75 in Spokane right now and 84 tomorrow.azgreg wrote:Miller should go on the Gonzaga visit with him and point out everything that's better at Arizona.Irish27 wrote:Miller will most likely be at Williams home on Sunday after his Gonzaga visit.YoDeFoe wrote:Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
Too bad it wasn't snowing.
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: let's talk '18
Was Gonzaga even involved with BW before he de-committed? Or are they yet another program who could benefit from the AZ smear job?Merkin wrote:75 in Spokane right now and 84 tomorrow.azgreg wrote:Miller should go on the Gonzaga visit with him and point out everything that's better at Arizona.Irish27 wrote:Miller will most likely be at Williams home on Sunday after his Gonzaga visit.YoDeFoe wrote:Williams is likely packing for Spokane tonight. Last official visit on Saturday... Hopefully we get an answer next week (that's me hoping, not me speculating).
Too bad it wasn't snowing.
-
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
- Reputation: 1180
Re: let's talk '18
Gonzaga was probably the most involved school not named Arizona in his original recruitment
Re: let's talk '18
Lock that last visit up Sean
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
-
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
- Reputation: 1180
Re: let's talk '18
Nevada is the one that worries me here. Gotta get that last visit.
Re: let's talk '18
FBI invest be damned we can’t lose a kid to Neveda!ChooChooCat wrote:Nevada is the one that worries me here. Gotta get that last visit.
Re: let's talk '18
Really cheap all you can eat buffet breakfasts may be tough to compete with.
Re: let's talk '18
Lol true!KaibabKat wrote:Really cheap all you can eat buffet breakfasts may be tough to compete with.
Re: let's talk '18
I mean, they add him and that's a legit FF contender next year. No shame, in this specific instance, in losing this recruiting battle.3goggles wrote:FBI invest be damned we can’t lose a kid to Neveda!ChooChooCat wrote:Nevada is the one that worries me here. Gotta get that last visit.
Re: let's talk '18
Nevada's Caleb Martin is testing the NBA waters. I think he stays in the draft. He's a top 20 pick. Certainly more draftable than Alkins or Trier who are long gone.
-
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
- Reputation: 1180
Re: let's talk '18
They play different positions. If Brown went to Nevada he'd be their center as they don't have anyone over 6'8 on their roster.zonagrad wrote:Nevada's Caleb Martin is testing the NBA waters. I think he stays in the draft. He's a top 20 pick. Certainly more draftable than Alkins or Trier who are long gone.