Chicat wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 11:35 am
Beachcat97 wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 11:24 am
I completely understand how the NIL is likely the most ethical course of action for these athletes, but this is going to quickly destroy whatever's left of traditional college athletics culture, right? How do you build team chemistry when 15 of the guys on the football team are already millionaires and the rest are living off of ramen and bad pizza?
Not even at Alabama will there be 15 millionaires on any team.
Does college athletics culture suffer because kids come from different backgrounds? Some kids come to school already well-to-do. Does that destroy teams from the inside?
I think certain players making money off their likeness will actually boost performance. Imagine you are behind a guy making 6 figures on the depth chart. Isn’t that an even greater incentive to play your way into the starting lineup so you can make money AND to prove you’re better than the guy making bank?
Chi: I think coming from a rich family is very different from making one's own millions at 18 or 19 years old. Rich kids on the football team aren't necessarily financially independent in the same way we're now going to see with the NIL.
And why can't there by 15 millionaires at Alabama? How many guys does Bama send to the NFL every year? How about Ohio State? Maybe 15 is a little high, but the point is that we're now in a situation where it is *possible* for a roster to have several kids earning more money at 18 than I am in my 40s.
As for whether this will boost performance, I guess we'll see. Maybe it'll work in the way you're envisioning.
Lastly, I think this gives an even greater advantage to schools located in/near major sports cities like Los Angeles, Dallas, Atlanta, Oakland/SF, and it potentially makes things rougher for schools in smaller college towns, like Tucson. The greatest marketing opportunities -- even in the Internet age -- are always going to be in the large metro hubs.