Comparing Miller and Lloyd to Robbins and Heeke, you see what real leaders look like.EastCoastCat wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 12:40 pm You nailed it Spiff...the transition was virtually seamless and drama free.
Both Miller and Lloyd deserve props for allowing Arizona basketball to be bigger than them.
From my own playing days, loyalty is huge deal in college coaching. If Miller told Murphy he was disloyal to go with Lloyd, it would have severely altered Murphy's career. It certainly seems like Miller let him go without any static. Same with the players, there were never rumblings Miller put pressure on them to leave.
Lloyd was good about welcoming Miller's guys. He retained Murphy and Rounds because they were good choices. The players were an easy choice (you're not turning Mathurin down) but he never did anything like punish Kerr for putting his name in the portal.
Compare that to petty BS like Robbins and Heeke pulling a tourney ban to keep Miller from saving his job or stringing out the firing for a month and lying about Miller's status. Miller and Lloyd put the people around them first and the program benefitted. Robbins and Heeke pulled an incestuous power trip.
I'd lay heavy money that's because Miller and Lloyd actually know what it means to lead a successful program. The buzz was always that people inside the program liked Miller much more than Robbins and the press. The internal part of the program seems strong under Lloyd too. Those guys get it in a way Robbins and Heeke don't.