I would take it but I think Cincinnati and UCF and WVU would sue and likely win
23 teams would make no sense for football or basketball
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
I would take it but I think Cincinnati and UCF and WVU would sue and likely win
This one?azcat49 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 7:28 pm Saw a tweet where it was said Fox is driving this merger so it’s about brand. And by brand, I mean football brand.
ESPIN drove the last round of realignment and this time it’s Fox. They vs will be selecting teams that fit their agenda, after all they are the ones paying for it
We'll probably end up the same place as ASU and we don't necessarily have any football rivals besides them but imagining us going years or decades without playing UCLA or Stanford or Washington is just bizarre.
What would be funny would be if UA, ASU, Utah and Colorado bolt and then UW, and Oregon are stuck with their counterparts and the Bay area in the PAC 12 north.
Unfortunately, the BYU fans in the Big12 will more than make up for the BruinsRichardCranium wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 4:37 am I do see a positive. Unless UA joins the B1G too Bruins will be less likely to post here.
Wow. As if I needed another reason to want to join the Big 12.RichardCranium wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 4:37 am I do see a positive. Unless UA joins the B1G too Bruins will be less likely to post here.
I would be totally okay with the SEC. Big 12 just makes more sense geographically.CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 10:59 am Would never happen but arizona to SEC would be the tits from a basketball fandom perspective
I think that we want UW/UO to get picked up by the B1G. If they don't I see two scenarios, neither of which are particularly good for the UA:CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 12:15 pm Lol. Canzano changing his tune and beginning to come around to UO and UW to BIG.
We fucked.
No problem splitting up with them if our AAU status saves us if the big ten expand beyond 20 (Colorado and Arizona as a package) and to make every big ten team a continuous linePHXCATS wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 12:03 pm ACC has 15 currently but rumors are Florida St and Clemson and UNC are candidates to go to the SEC and Big Ten
Stanford
Oregon
Washington
Florida St
Clemson
Miami
Notre Dame
UNC
Baylor
I think those would all be more desired than UA solo
UA would never ever ever get into the Big Ten with asu. Big Ten is already fuming mad about Nebraska academically
The UA isn't in Phoenix. And I would not count on a UA/asu package. In this game its every man/school for themselves.CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 12:59 pm I respect your opinion and agree on some parts, but I don’t the hardon for Uw.
Garbage football team, garbage basketball team, and the Phoenix market is bigger. Not sure I see the “ national reasoning” why they are better then a UofA asu package.
ABOR doesn’t see it this way.dmjcat wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:15 pmThe UA isn't in Phoenix. And I would not count on a UA/asu package. In this game its every man/school for themselves.CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 12:59 pm I respect your opinion and agree on some parts, but I don’t the hardon for Uw.
Garbage football team, garbage basketball team, and the Phoenix market is bigger. Not sure I see the “ national reasoning” why they are better then a UofA asu package.
The metro population of Seattle is north of 4 million.........Tucson around 1 million. I suspect Fox/ESPN value the Seattle market more than Tucson. I agree that UW has been garbage in everything recently but their football program has historically been better than the UA.
The Arizona/asu package deal? Oklahoma and Oklahoma state had a similar one and look what happened.CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:28 pmABOR doesn’t see it this way.dmjcat wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:15 pmThe UA isn't in Phoenix. And I would not count on a UA/asu package. In this game its every man/school for themselves.CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 12:59 pm I respect your opinion and agree on some parts, but I don’t the hardon for Uw.
Garbage football team, garbage basketball team, and the Phoenix market is bigger. Not sure I see the “ national reasoning” why they are better then a UofA asu package.
The metro population of Seattle is north of 4 million.........Tucson around 1 million. I suspect Fox/ESPN value the Seattle market more than Tucson. I agree that UW has been garbage in everything recently but their football program has historically been better than the UA.
If you believe that football fans outside of Tucson are eagerly tuning into UA football games then you are sadly mistaken. Most football fans outside of Tucson haven't given a rats ass about the UA for more than a decade........and for the last several years neither have people in Tucson for that matter. There are many rankings of College football teams based on TV markets. They all share 1 thing in that the UA is near the bottom.CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:29 pm Also news flash, uofa grads populate all major west coast markets not just Tucson.
The UA doesn't drive TV eyeballs.........we consistently rank in the 60's or lower.AzCatFan2 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:38 pm TV market size was paramount a decade ago. Today? With streaming options and less broadcast over the air only, TV eyeballs are becoming more and more important. And when it comes to eyeballs, Arizona has a good brand. Would be great if we had any semblance of a football program.
Washington and Oregon won't stay in a watered down PAC if all we do is add UNLV and SDSU. We would need to add more, like OK State and a big program from Texas, like Baylor. Add in TTech plus Boise St, which would mean watering down academic standards in the PAC, but that would be a 16 team PAC with some solid brands.
Right now, I think patience is needed. We need to try and hitch our wagon to Oregon and Washington if possible. They have more value to us than any school in the current iteration of the BIG 12. I also don't see Oregon and UW bolting for the BIG 12. BIG 10 calls, and they are gone.
We should also see what the Cougs and Beavs are doing. There is already proposed legislation in WA to keep WSU and UW in the same conference. Would make things interesting.
In the end, I don't see us being completely left out. Football is king, but compare Arizona football to ASu or Colorado, there isn't much of a difference. But throw in all other athletics that draw eyeballs, like men's and women's basketball, baseball, softball, etc., Arizona shines. And our academics aren't a drawback either.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... n-playoff/With or without Notre Dame, one industry source doubted there was value for the Big Ten in inviting Oregon and/or Washington. That source went so far as to call the two schools "tweeners," not big enough to justify the $80 million-$100 million annual media rights fees but clearly better than other Pac-12 schools.
Think of Oregon and Washington more attractive to the Big 12 if the Pac-12 doesn't stick together. Speaking of that …
Football is king. No doubt. But football only runs for four months. TV networks need to fill 12 months worth of programming. Add in all TV viewership from non-football sports, and total eyeballs for Arizona games are similar to Utah, Colorado, ASu, etc.dmjcat wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:27 pmThe UA doesn't drive TV eyeballs.........we consistently rank in the 60's or lower.AzCatFan2 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:38 pm TV market size was paramount a decade ago. Today? With streaming options and less broadcast over the air only, TV eyeballs are becoming more and more important. And when it comes to eyeballs, Arizona has a good brand. Would be great if we had any semblance of a football program.
Washington and Oregon won't stay in a watered down PAC if all we do is add UNLV and SDSU. We would need to add more, like OK State and a big program from Texas, like Baylor. Add in TTech plus Boise St, which would mean watering down academic standards in the PAC, but that would be a 16 team PAC with some solid brands.
Right now, I think patience is needed. We need to try and hitch our wagon to Oregon and Washington if possible. They have more value to us than any school in the current iteration of the BIG 12. I also don't see Oregon and UW bolting for the BIG 12. BIG 10 calls, and they are gone.
We should also see what the Cougs and Beavs are doing. There is already proposed legislation in WA to keep WSU and UW in the same conference. Would make things interesting.
In the end, I don't see us being completely left out. Football is king, but compare Arizona football to ASu or Colorado, there isn't much of a difference. But throw in all other athletics that draw eyeballs, like men's and women's basketball, baseball, softball, etc., Arizona shines. And our academics aren't a drawback either.
https://medium.com/run-it-back-with-zac ... c03c689e50
ESPN/FOX/ABC/CBS/NBC don't give a rats ass about womens basketball, baseball, and certainly not academics. Its all about the $$$$$$$
The current realignment is entirely driven by $$$$ Money $$$$$$. This a brutal money grab, pure and simple.
Completely agree. Arizona had to do what’s good for arizona and let the other follow.RondaeShimmy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:27 pmhttps://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... n-playoff/With or without Notre Dame, one industry source doubted there was value for the Big Ten in inviting Oregon and/or Washington. That source went so far as to call the two schools "tweeners," not big enough to justify the $80 million-$100 million annual media rights fees but clearly better than other Pac-12 schools.
Think of Oregon and Washington more attractive to the Big 12 if the Pac-12 doesn't stick together. Speaking of that …
Yikes
I'm thinking if the two Arizona schools and the mountains secure their places in the big 12, Oregon and Washington would have to follow instead of waiting on the big ten. Could also lead to a merger of the two conferences like the article says.
I'm not sure its that simple. The Big12 will pick whomever they think benefits the Big12 the most........which I believe would be Oregon/Washington. I'm thinking that the Big12 will wait to see if the B1G rejects UO/UW before moving to gobble up the PAC12.RondaeShimmy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:27 pmhttps://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... n-playoff/With or without Notre Dame, one industry source doubted there was value for the Big Ten in inviting Oregon and/or Washington. That source went so far as to call the two schools "tweeners," not big enough to justify the $80 million-$100 million annual media rights fees but clearly better than other Pac-12 schools.
Think of Oregon and Washington more attractive to the Big 12 if the Pac-12 doesn't stick together. Speaking of that …
Yikes
I'm thinking if the two Arizona schools and the mountains secure their places in the big 12, Oregon and Washington would have to follow instead of waiting on the big ten. Could also lead to a merger of the two conferences like the article says.