That take is...well...terribleBosy Billups wrote:I'm would rather not say anything is official, but...
UCLA = UNLV at this point.
There is no revival coming for the foreseeable and unforeseeable future.
How do you revive that mess? It's close to impossible.
UCLA Basketball in trouble!
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
HEH.MrBug708 wrote:That take is...well...terribleBosy Billups wrote:I'm would rather not say anything is official, but...
UCLA = UNLV at this point.
There is no revival coming for the foreseeable and unforeseeable future.
How do you revive that mess? It's close to impossible.
Nice win, Zags. It's good that at least one other program out West is making strides.
- JMarkJohns
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:28 am
- Reputation: 174
- Location: VforVindication
- Contact:
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Depends on your definition of revival. Are they ever going to win multiple titles in a short window again? Doubtful. Not even Kentucky with all its talent has managed that. Can they, with the right coach (not this one), capitalize on the heavy saturation of local talent, utilize their Addidas contacts and LA market to draw one or two of the best national players, and make a few Final 4s in a short window? Sure. They've already done it recently. I'd even say they could win a Title here and there.Bosy Billups wrote:I'm would rather not say anything is official, but...
UCLA = UNLV at this point.
There is no revival coming for the foreseeable and unforeseeable future.
How do you revive that mess? It's close to impossible.
But the days of even the early 1990s dynasty teams of Duke, NC, UNLV, etc, they are gone because players don't stick around like that outside of the exception of Florida.
Not even Duke now can find sustained success for Final 4s, let alone Titles.
Modern coaches need to have a reasonable 5 year window with a down year, 1 Sweet 16, an Elite 8, a Final 4 or two or better. That's the best anyone will consistently achieve.
Will they do it with Alford? Hell no. It won't matter if Brown is there for a year. Alford is an average coach and tactician, and those types don't win big.
But can they with a legit coach? Prior to Howland burning LA connections to the ground, they already had. So, I'd say they can do it again. Short of a caring fanbase, they have everything a program would want.
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Prove me wrong please. Even if you had 5 five stars, you can see there is no chemistry. Alford is in over his head. He is used to coaching at the mid major level, but like Dunk City across the street, has no idea how competitive a major conference is.MrBug708 wrote:That take is...well...terribleBosy Billups wrote:I'm would rather not say anything is official, but...
UCLA = UNLV at this point.
There is no revival coming for the foreseeable and unforeseeable future.
How do you revive that mess? It's close to impossible.
Love how CSA congratulated Pangos towards the end of the game. Haven't seem him do that once toward his own team.
Just don't see a revival coming anytime soon.
Do you?
And how?
Minus blinders, you think at age 50+. CSA has something up his sleeve to all of a sudden become a world beater coach and in the talk for elite? Judging his hair and moles (sorry, not fair, but funny), it's not happening.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
You aren't really looking to be proved wrong. If you don't see it, whether you want to or not, that's fine. But basing it off this lost year is silly.Bosy Billups wrote: Prove me wrong please. Even if you had 5 five stars, you can see there is no chemistry. Alford is in over his head. He is used to coaching at the mid major level, but like Dunk City across the street, have no idea how competitive a major conference is.
Love how CSA congratulated Pangos towards the end of the game. Haven't seem him do that once toward his own team.
Just don't see a revival coming anytime soon.
Do you?
And how?
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
I agree wholeheartedly with Bug. UCLA's grand revival is right around the corner. They'll overtake UK and everyone else shortly, and anyone who predicts otherwise is simply foolish.MrBug708 wrote:You aren't really looking to be proved wrong. If you don't see it, whether you want to or not, that's fine. But basing it off this lost year is silly.Bosy Billups wrote: Prove me wrong please. Even if you had 5 five stars, you can see there is no chemistry. Alford is in over his head. He is used to coaching at the mid major level, but like Dunk City across the street, have no idea how competitive a major conference is.
Love how CSA congratulated Pangos towards the end of the game. Haven't seem him do that once toward his own team.
Just don't see a revival coming anytime soon.
Do you?
And how?
HEH! Go Zags!
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
I want to see it. I want to be wrong. Really, I do. I want UCLA to be picked first for the conference and have everyone try to battle them down. Not that fun of a position, to be honest. Still, forget this year, how do you see it changing, regardless of future recruits.MrBug708 wrote:You aren't really looking to be proved wrong. If you don't see it, whether you want to or not, that's fine. But basing it off this lost year is silly.Bosy Billups wrote: Prove me wrong please. Even if you had 5 five stars, you can see there is no chemistry. Alford is in over his head. He is used to coaching at the mid major level, but like Dunk City across the street, have no idea how competitive a major conference is.
Love how CSA congratulated Pangos towards the end of the game. Haven't seem him do that once toward his own team.
Just don't see a revival coming anytime soon.
Do you?
And how?
It's strange, after 1.5 years, I still have no idea what defense he runs. Do you? Zone? Man? Mix?
Second, why does he allow Bryce, the PG, to be the #1 shooter on the team? PS - he will be there next year and the year after.
Third, why does Alford insist on using "Up tempo pace" in every interview, yet keeps losing. He needs to focus more on defense IMO.
Those are just quick objective thoughts. I'd ask the same about Arizona if Alford were the coach. Can you opine?
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
This is gonna be good.Bosy Billups wrote:I want to see it. I want to be wrong. Really, I do. I want UCLA to be picked first for the conference and have everyone try to battle them down. Not that fun of a position, to be honest. Still, forget this year, how do you see it changing, regardless of future recruits.MrBug708 wrote:You aren't really looking to be proved wrong. If you don't see it, whether you want to or not, that's fine. But basing it off this lost year is silly.Bosy Billups wrote: Prove me wrong please. Even if you had 5 five stars, you can see there is no chemistry. Alford is in over his head. He is used to coaching at the mid major level, but like Dunk City across the street, have no idea how competitive a major conference is.
Love how CSA congratulated Pangos towards the end of the game. Haven't seem him do that once toward his own team.
Just don't see a revival coming anytime soon.
Do you?
And how?
It's strange, after 1.5 years, I still have no idea what defense he runs. Do you? Zone? Man? Mix?
Second, why does he allow Bryce, the PG, to be the #1 shooter on the team? PS - he will be there next year and the year after.
Third, why does Alford insist on using "Up tempo pace" in every interview, yet keeps losing. He needs to focus more on defense IMO.
Those are just quick objective thoughts. I'd ask the same about Arizona if Alford were the coach. Can you opine?
Heh.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
At home, against a top 10 team, and that's all that shows up? yeesh.Katzenfreund wrote:Traffic must be murderous.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Your ignorance on UCLA, and your inability to separate the struggles of the team this year, are your undoing. It's obvious Bryce is a weak spot and it's not going to change, but he'll adapt and still improve through his senior year. The biggest problems right now is a lack of any sort of depth on the team and the lack of athletic ability. Outside of a talent influx, there wont be any sort of improvement on D. The team is usually playing hard, but you can't make something be what they aren't. And this team isn't a good defensive team.Bosy Billups wrote: I want to see it. I want to be wrong. Really, I do. I want UCLA to be picked first for the conference and have everyone try to battle them down. Not that fun of a position, to be honest. Still, forget this year, how do you see it changing, regardless of future recruits.
It's strange, after 1.5 years, I still have no idea what defense he runs. Do you? Zone? Man? Mix?
Second, why does he allow Bryce, the PG, to be the #1 shooter on the team? PS - he will be there next year and the year after.
Third, why does Alford insist on using "Up tempo pace" in every interview, yet keeps losing. He needs to focus more on defense IMO.
Those are just quick objective thoughts. I'd ask the same about Arizona if Alford were the coach. Can you opine?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Wow! That picture next to McKale against Gonzaga will be the first slide for Miller's presentation for any SoCal recruit.PieceOfMeat wrote:At home, against a top 10 team, and that's all that shows up? yeesh.Katzenfreund wrote:Traffic must be murderous.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Didn't realize that Miller was struggling vs UCLA in Socal recruiting..?
Attendance was 10,006. Must have counted staff as UCLA (and I believe the PAC-12 in general) counts turnstiles.
Attendance was 10,006. Must have counted staff as UCLA (and I believe the PAC-12 in general) counts turnstiles.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46562
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3930
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
He isn't, and he won't. Not with that kind of fan "support" in Westwood.MrBug708 wrote:Didn't realize that Miller was struggling vs UCLA in Socal recruiting..?
But guys, we should give UCLA fans a pass in regards to not showing up for this game. I heard it rained in LA this week.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
No kidding.Chicat wrote:He isn't, and he won't.MrBug708 wrote:Didn't realize that Miller was struggling vs UCLA in Socal recruiting..?
- Chicat
- Posts: 46562
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3930
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Just wait out the Bryce era. It'll get better.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
How many extensions does Guerrero give him though?
- Chicat
- Posts: 46562
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3930
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Hopefully no more than 1 a year.MrBug708 wrote:How many extensions does Guerrero give him though?
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Bruin Nation wanted the anti-Howland. Got it. Worst D in the league, and soft.
Right where I want to be.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Get Jimmy Connors' autograph. Neil Everett behind the Zag bench. Spokane kid.3goggles wrote:I'm sorry but why would any recruit would want to play for FUCLA!
Right where I want to be.
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
I hear you, really, but my question goes back to leadership and coaching. You're talking about the players running the program. I'm talking about Alford and staff. What is his defensive philosophy? Please answer that. Then, let me know how that philosophy will win championships and bring UCLA out of the hole.MrBug708 wrote:Your ignorance on UCLA, and your inability to separate the struggles of the team this year, are your undoing. It's obvious Bryce is a weak spot and it's not going to change, but he'll adapt and still improve through his senior year. The biggest problems right now is a lack of any sort of depth on the team and the lack of athletic ability. Outside of a talent influx, there wont be any sort of improvement on D. The team is usually playing hard, but you can't make something be what they aren't. And this team isn't a good defensive team.Bosy Billups wrote: I want to see it. I want to be wrong. Really, I do. I want UCLA to be picked first for the conference and have everyone try to battle them down. Not that fun of a position, to be honest. Still, forget this year, how do you see it changing, regardless of future recruits.
It's strange, after 1.5 years, I still have no idea what defense he runs. Do you? Zone? Man? Mix?
Second, why does he allow Bryce, the PG, to be the #1 shooter on the team? PS - he will be there next year and the year after.
Third, why does Alford insist on using "Up tempo pace" in every interview, yet keeps losing. He needs to focus more on defense IMO.
Those are just quick objective thoughts. I'd ask the same about Arizona if Alford were the coach. Can you opine?
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
You're going to make poor widdle Bug's head explode, BB.Bosy Billups wrote:I hear you, really, but my question goes back to leadership and coaching. You're talking about the players running the program. I'm talking about Alford and staff. What is his defensive philosophy? Please answer that. Then, let me know how that philosophy will win championships and bring UCLA out of the hole.MrBug708 wrote:Your ignorance on UCLA, and your inability to separate the struggles of the team this year, are your undoing. It's obvious Bryce is a weak spot and it's not going to change, but he'll adapt and still improve through his senior year. The biggest problems right now is a lack of any sort of depth on the team and the lack of athletic ability. Outside of a talent influx, there wont be any sort of improvement on D. The team is usually playing hard, but you can't make something be what they aren't. And this team isn't a good defensive team.Bosy Billups wrote: I want to see it. I want to be wrong. Really, I do. I want UCLA to be picked first for the conference and have everyone try to battle them down. Not that fun of a position, to be honest. Still, forget this year, how do you see it changing, regardless of future recruits.
It's strange, after 1.5 years, I still have no idea what defense he runs. Do you? Zone? Man? Mix?
Second, why does he allow Bryce, the PG, to be the #1 shooter on the team? PS - he will be there next year and the year after.
Third, why does Alford insist on using "Up tempo pace" in every interview, yet keeps losing. He needs to focus more on defense IMO.
Those are just quick objective thoughts. I'd ask the same about Arizona if Alford were the coach. Can you opine?
I wonder if UCLA can stay within 30 of UK next weekend.
HEH!
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
You mean does he want to stop the other team? I'd imagine so, but I can tell that Powell is already sick of Bryce and even he isn't trying much anymore. Last year he was pretty solid and his Sophomore year, he was really trying on defense, but this team is just so poorly constructed that anything they try just pretty much fails. It's hard to tell if Bryce can't play defense or doesnt want to. I suspect it's more the former but sometimes it looks that way. Isaac Hamilton has totally changed his style of play, but he's just not athletic enough to play in anything but a zone. Just need to work through this year and hope that Bryce makes some strides and once he's an upperclassmen, most of the kids coming in already know the deal with Alford's kid and will probably be more "understanding" about nepotism. I'd say right now Alford is adjusting his scheme to personnel. He has the ability to adjust his style to his team. His defense is bad, mostly because the team just isn't that good right now. He's trying to make style of play as attractive as he can, hence the AAU style, because that's the best way to get talent in right now.Bosy Billups wrote: I hear you, really, but my question goes back to leadership and coaching. You're talking about the players running the program. I'm talking about Alford and staff. What is his defensive philosophy? Please answer that. Then, let me know how that philosophy will win championships and bring UCLA out of the hole.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Seriously Bug what do you think about Alford? Can he actually build a program or will he just be getting pit stop talent like Zimmerman or what Adidas funnels him?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
I'd say he's probably not the answer. We would have had more of a picture had he been able to get Octeus and Bolden or if Bryce was 3 inches taller
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
And we would have won the national title if Ashley hadn't gotten injured. And UCLA would've won every single tourney in the 80s if they'd cloned Wooden.MrBug708 wrote:We would have had more of a picture had he been able to get Octeus and Bolden or if Bryce was 3 inches taller
HEH!
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Truthfully, hiding their names and faces, I don't see much difference between Alford and Pastner. Except, Alford has the ability to discipline and be respected, but my gut tells me he's more concerned about being liked by his players. Which may be inaccurate, but that's the only reason why I can fathom why he would want to play AAU ball against the top bball programs in the nation...they will eat that shit up.MrBug708 wrote:You mean does he want to stop the other team? I'd imagine so, but I can tell that Powell is already sick of Bryce and even he isn't trying much anymore. Last year he was pretty solid and his Sophomore year, he was really trying on defense, but this team is just so poorly constructed that anything they try just pretty much fails. It's hard to tell if Bryce can't play defense or doesnt want to. I suspect it's more the former but sometimes it looks that way. Isaac Hamilton has totally changed his style of play, but he's just not athletic enough to play in anything but a zone. Just need to work through this year and hope that Bryce makes some strides and once he's an upperclassmen, most of the kids coming in already know the deal with Alford's kid and will probably be more "understanding" about nepotism. I'd say right now Alford is adjusting his scheme to personnel. He has the ability to adjust his style to his team. His defense is bad, mostly because the team just isn't that good right now. He's trying to make style of play as attractive as he can, hence the AAU style, because that's the best way to get talent in right now.Bosy Billups wrote: I hear you, really, but my question goes back to leadership and coaching. You're talking about the players running the program. I'm talking about Alford and staff. What is his defensive philosophy? Please answer that. Then, let me know how that philosophy will win championships and bring UCLA out of the hole.
FTR, Bryce is good, great shooter, quick, nice stroke. He's also cocky and can be a punk to his peers at times. Maybe he's a less talented version of nigel gross, but for this team, you need an upper class boss. Seriously, someone like Momo Jones, to grab the jerseys of the players and get them playing hard.
This year's a pass, but for Alford and UCLA's sake, hope CSA gets back to what made him successful at UNM and worry less about being Mr. Uptempo.
PS - It's fine if CSA will play zone with his hand picked players, it works for Cuse. As long as it's practiced and disciplined, it can be effective. Maybe I'm just too used to Miller, because he used his system and Man to Man, even without the right players, even though that cost us games, and even though that ended the NCAA tourney streak. He didn't care, because he knew for the future, the best choice was to become very good at the pack line defense, and practice over and over, until you get good.
PPS - Back to AAU ball, may be the best way to get talent in right now, but may not be the talent you want. The cream of the crop want to become the best and get tough love from their coach. Howland was brilliant in his prime.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Granted I've only been surfing Bruins Nation since early this past year, but man, do those guys have it out for Alford and the AD. No filter at all.gumby wrote:Bruin Nation wanted the anti-Howland. Got it. Worst D in the league, and soft.
Found a post back when Alford was hired, where the BN staff recruited Iowa's main blogger to introduce Alford to the Bruin fanbase on pretty bitter terms.
And I said, ‘That last thing is what you can't get...Nobody can get to that last thing. We keep on living in hopes of catching it once and for all.’ Jack Kerouac, On The Road
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
So what's the stance over there on attendance? If you could fire fans, they'd be gone. As it is, looks like they resigned.CatsbyAZ wrote:Granted I've only been surfing Bruins Nation since early this past year, but man, do those guys have it out for Alford and the AD. No filter at all.gumby wrote:Bruin Nation wanted the anti-Howland. Got it. Worst D in the league, and soft.
Found a post back when Alford was hired, where the BN staff recruited Iowa's main blogger to introduce Alford to the Bruin fanbase on pretty bitter terms.
Right where I want to be.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
What does it say that in the interim between Olson and Miller that UA still led the PAC in attendance? I mean, there is one major freeway in Tucson, and I know traffic is a pain...so...what is uCla's excuse?
I can't believe how the fan base has changed. I have a buddy who is a uCla grad and huge supporter of them, and he hasn't been interested in basketball at all for the past 3 years. Pretty sad.
I can't believe how the fan base has changed. I have a buddy who is a uCla grad and huge supporter of them, and he hasn't been interested in basketball at all for the past 3 years. Pretty sad.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Interest has been higher in UCLA football the past two seasons than at any time during Howland's three FF seasons.Olsondogg wrote:What does it say that in the interim between Olson and Miller that UA still led the PAC in attendance? I mean, there is one major freeway in Tucson, and I know traffic is a pain...so...what is uCla's excuse?
I can't believe how the fan base has changed. I have a buddy who is a uCla grad and huge supporter of them, and he hasn't been interested in basketball at all for the past 3 years. Pretty sad.
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
That was impressive to still have that fanfare. But that is 100% a result of Lute and his 20 year dominance. It became habit. Yes, having a college town helps, but that was Lute Olson's doing for keeping the Cats the show in town for over 2 decades.Olsondogg wrote:What does it say that in the interim between Olson and Miller that UA still led the PAC in attendance? I mean, there is one major freeway in Tucson, and I know traffic is a pain...so...what is uCla's excuse?
I can't believe how the fan base has changed. I have a buddy who is a uCla grad and huge supporter of them, and he hasn't been interested in basketball at all for the past 3 years. Pretty sad.
Attendance was an issue with the media when Miller for started. Not a huge issue, but think we were around the 12,000-13,000 range? We also sucked, but that was a fun time.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46562
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3930
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
The story we heard during the Howland years was that all those empty seats were some form of protest against the direction of the program and an effort to get Howland fired. Mission accomplished. But then why haven't those protesters come back now that they got what they wanted?
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
^
Bingo! That was what Walton, among others, claimed.
Bingo! That was what Walton, among others, claimed.
Right where I want to be.
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Because no one gives a sh*t about UCLA basketball. I'm not sure why this is so difficult to recognize.Chicat wrote: But then why haven't those protesters come back now that they got what they wanted?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
"Most active topic for this poster." One-third of all posts.Beachcat97 wrote:Because no one gives a sh*t about UCLA basketball. I'm not sure why this is so difficult to recognize.Chicat wrote: But then why haven't those protesters come back now that they got what they wanted?
Right where I want to be.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Hilarious coming from you.Beachcat97 wrote:Because no one gives a sh*t about UCLA basketball. I'm not sure why this is so difficult to recognize.Chicat wrote: But then why haven't those protesters come back now that they got what they wanted?
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
So with a 13 point loss to the Zags we just need a nice 22 point Kentucky beatdown (spread is -14.5) to hit the guess on the nose.SCCat wrote:So UCLA's next two games are at home against Gonzaga and in Chicago against Kentucky.
The game is to guess how much UCLA loses the two games by in total. My guess is 35 points (about a ten point loss to the Zags and a 25 point loss to UK).
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
THANKS, ADIDAS
looking forward to seeing the new UCLA ANTEATERS warmups this season!
- 77HoyaCat4Ever
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:07 am
- Reputation: 0
- Location: In transit
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Kentucky looks like an NBA team.
UCLA like a junior high squad.
UCLA like a junior high squad.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
This game is going even better than I had hoped.
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
16-0 start is77HoyaCat4Ever wrote:Kentucky looks like an NBA team.
UCLA like a junior high squad.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Don't look Ethel.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Mercy rule!
Bruins not used to playing in front of a crowd
Bruins not used to playing in front of a crowd
Right where I want to be.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
UCLA is an embarrassment to the Pac-12.
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
- Main Event
- Posts: 2756
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
freshman vs varsity. BRO threads should be funny
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Embarrassing. Alford may take the worst shots in all of NCAAB
- FreeSpiritCat
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:22 pm
- Reputation: 467
- Location: Augusta, Maine
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
This is the most embarrassing game I've ever seen. The question is will UCLA score at all.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
I assume that was a historic start. Other team scores 24 before UCLA scores their first point? UCLA misses 17 shots to start a game?
My assumption is neither of those things have ever happened before.
My assumption is neither of those things have ever happened before.
Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?
Hey guys, which freeway do you think is the best one for me to walk across blindfolded?
History says, Don't hope
On this side of the grave,
But then, once in a lifetime
The longed-for tidal wave
Of justice can rise up
And hope and history rhyme.
Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth.
On this side of the grave,
But then, once in a lifetime
The longed-for tidal wave
Of justice can rise up
And hope and history rhyme.
Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth.