Does this mean he's gone for the rest of the season?
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
That's not a suit. That's a free blazer from Joseph A. Bank ("Buy 1, get 6 free!") and some wrinkled Dockers. It's the I Don't Give A Fuck, Just Let My Son Shoot The Ball look and he's perfected it.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
4 minutes left in the first half and UCLA has 3 made shots and 9 turnovers.
Alford does realize he was supposed to be a step up from Howland right?
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Just now noticed this game (UCLA-Alabama) was on, after finishing the Packers game. Nice filler before I tune into the late NFL game.
And I said, ‘That last thing is what you can't get...Nobody can get to that last thing. We keep on living in hopes of catching it once and for all.’ Jack Kerouac, On The Road
Parker & Hamilton are playing well; very productive with the touches they've had. But all I see is Alford Jr dragging the ball up the floor and coughing in up. Ball should be fed a lot more into Parker. Anyone else see Parker giving us fits in the middle?
And I said, ‘That last thing is what you can't get...Nobody can get to that last thing. We keep on living in hopes of catching it once and for all.’ Jack Kerouac, On The Road
CatsbyAZ wrote:Parker & Hamilton are playing well; very productive with the touches they've had. But all I see is Alford Jr dragging the ball up the floor and coughing in up. Ball should be fed a lot more into Parker. Anyone else see Parker giving us fits in the middle?
Anyone else noticing that the only player Alford talks to (aka coaches up) during the game is his kid? The rest of his roster off to themselves on the bench.
And I said, ‘That last thing is what you can't get...Nobody can get to that last thing. We keep on living in hopes of catching it once and for all.’ Jack Kerouac, On The Road
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
I'm starting to wonder if you might start seeing some really bad things as the season goes on. As an example of a "really bad thing", I might put forward something like Norman Powell just walking away from the team during the season. Things on that level are starting to seem possible.
Feel bad for Powell playing on this trainwreck of a team. Alford goes 3-13 yet it seemed he was 3-23. Hamilton almost gets a triple double with 15-5 and 7. Problem is the 7 was turnovers. 2 points from the bench which is down to what, 3 guys?
It really is a sad state of affairs in bruin land and for the conference. Just don't understand how the AD keeps his job (although Howland and Mora produced)
Last edited by azcat49 on Sun Dec 28, 2014 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
SCCat wrote:I'm starting to wonder if you might start seeing some really bad things as the season goes on. As an example of a "really bad thing", I might put forward something like Norman Powell just walking away from the team during the season. Things on that level are starting to seem possible.
Considering how much UCLA would have to pony up to cut Alford's contract loose, it's already really bad.
Norman Powell can't carry any Division I team, let alone UCLA. Bryce Alford might get 'em to the NIT.
They'll have to back up the dumptruck of cash in Westwood just to start over. That's Michigan football-level bad.
This is beachcat's glory season. uCla starts off on the road in the mountains, and I expect Rado will have some sort of resurgence...and Tah is good.
8-7 in a week, with 5 straight losses?
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
azcat49 wrote:Feel bad for Powell playing on this trainwreck of a team. Alford goes 3-13 yet it seemed he was 3-23. Hamilton almost gets a triple double with 15-5 and 7. Problem is the 7 was turnovers. 2 points from the bench which is down to what, 3 guys?
It really is a sad state of affairs in bruin land and for the conference. Just don't understand how the AD keeps his job (although Howland and Mora produced)
Even more sad, word on the street was he really wanted to go to SDSU and play for Fisher. But "things" made him go to UCLA/Howland.
If he went to SDSU, he'd probably be a lottery pick already.
Absolutely. It's nice to see UCLA basketball rearing its ugly head. There are some built-in disadvantages with UCLA hoops that will keep them stuck in the 2nd or 3rd tier for the time being, and if they strike out with Brown and Zimmerman, you can expect more of the same next year.
Why would anyone want to play for Steve freaking Alford at UCLA?
Katzenfreund wrote:They'll play out of their minds on February 21st and upset us at McKale. And at the P-12 tournament.
i know it's tounge in cheeck but I've watched enough ucla for one season and I just don't see that happening. Now if Az let's Ballhogford go off than we have bigger issues than I thought.
I still smile knowing that they forced out a really good basketball coach, only to get Alford.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Bosy Billups wrote:Who can UCLA realistically have gotten if it weren't for Alford? (no, not Gregg Marshall)
Who can UCLA realistically get if Alford gets hired? (no, not Gregg Marshall)
Some faithful still believe Brad Stevens is attainable. What in tarnation?
There are multiple reasons they haven't been able to attract an elite coach. Not sure why so few can see it. Zero fan support, students don't care, UCLA is more interested in academics than athletics, etc. It's up to the Jim Moras and Steve Alfords of the world to carry their flagship athletic programs.
Bosy Billups wrote:Who can UCLA realistically have gotten if it weren't for Alford? (no, not Gregg Marshall)
Who can UCLA realistically get if Alford gets hired? (no, not Gregg Marshall)
Some faithful still believe Brad Stevens is attainable. What in tarnation?
There are multiple reasons they haven't been able to attract an elite coach. Not sure why so few can see it. Zero fan support, students don't care, UCLA is more interested in academics than athletics, etc. It's up to the Jim Moras and Steve Alfords of the world to carry their flagship athletic programs.
HEH!
If there's enough damage done, it may become interesting as a turnaround story, and the fan base would be desperate for anything just a little bit better. It'd have to be someone younger, a rising star. That's my prediction how it shakes out. But needs to hit bottom first.
Bosy Billups wrote:Who can UCLA realistically have gotten if it weren't for Alford? (no, not Gregg Marshall)
Who can UCLA realistically get if Alford gets hired? (no, not Gregg Marshall)
Some faithful still believe Brad Stevens is attainable. What in tarnation?
There are multiple reasons they haven't been able to attract an elite coach. Not sure why so few can see it. Zero fan support, students don't care, UCLA is more interested in academics than athletics, etc. It's up to the Jim Moras and Steve Alfords of the world to carry their flagship athletic programs.
HEH!
If there's enough damage done, it may become interesting as a turnaround story, and the fan base would be desperate for anything just a little bit better. It'd have to be someone younger, a rising star. That's my prediction how it shakes out. But needs to hit bottom first.
Where exactly is bottom? UCLA is a third tier program nationally, and currently about the same in their own conference. UK beat them by 40. Is "bottom" losing by 50?