Kansas

salim'sheadband · Post by **salim'sheadband** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 10:11 pm

Quite a game between the "9th" best team in the country, the Kansas Fightin' Fanny Packs, and their longtime nemesis TCU today. The Fannies were able to prevail.

Puerco · Post by **Puerco** » Fri Mar 13, 2015 1:02 am

Battle tested. In every game.

enfuego · Post by **enfuego** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 11:17 am

Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.

Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

qwertyus · Post by **qwertyus** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:06 pm

This Kansas-ISU game is absolutely torture to watch. Terrible both ways.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:12 pm

Down goes Kansas in some kind of technical win kind of way.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:14 pm

Another quality loss.

splitsecond · Post by **splitsecond** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:15 pm

How does Self so consistently take 5 star players and make them as soft as baby shit?

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:18 pm

splitsecond wrote:How does Self so consistently take 5 star players and make them as soft as baby shit?

It's a skill.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:19 pm

Kansas should be a 4 seed. But lunardi said they are a 2 even with this loss. I don't care if you play nothing but #1 teams...you don't deserve a 2 seed if you lose every game to good teams you play.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:19 pm

Step 1) Enfuego talks shit
Step 2) Kansas loses
Step 3) Repeat

AzDave · Post by **AzDave** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:21 pm

KU sews up a 2 seed with yet another quality loss!

What a joke....gonna be over seeded...again....and lose to a team like Stanford...again. But hey, back to back SOS champs! Way to go Jayhawks!

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:49 pm

p0 kansas

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 5:58 pm

Notre Dame should get the 2 seed over Kansas.

Bangkok Wildcat · Post by **Bangkok Wildcat** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:01 pm

I like when Kansas loses......but I can't tell most of my family that

. Have to be a closet KU hater....anyways, a good day already. BTFD and let's put a 3rd beatdown on the Ducks!

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:15 pm

catgrad97 wrote:Notre Dame should get the 2 seed over Kansas.

I'll be pretty surprised if Kansas ended up a two, but we will know soon enough.

enfuego · Post by **enfuego** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:34 pm

qwertyus wrote:This Kansas-ISU game is absolutely torture to watch. Terrible both ways.

Did you watch UA/UCLA last night? Maybe you're not used to watching two top 15 teams going at it. Good luck tonight against another in a long list of unranked teams Arizona has to "challenge" themselves against in Oregon. I may watch it to watch the Pac-12 POY get worked out of the game by the referees.

salim'sheadband · Post by **salim'sheadband** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:36 pm

Any games today?

salim'sheadband · Post by **salim'sheadband** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 7:27 pm

I see all these Sweet Sixteen caliber teams in the Big 12 are preparing Kansas for their Sweet Sixteen loss. That's kind of them.

WildcatStunner · Post by **WildcatStunner** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 11:45 pm

Guys, let's be honest, Iowa State would go undefeated in the Pac 12.

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Sat Mar 14, 2015 11:47 pm

Wow...8 losses. don't teams that lose that often usually go to the nit or cbi?

Puerco · Post by **Puerco** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 2:05 am

enfuego wrote:
Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.
Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

It's good to know you're already moving on emotionally, fuego. That'll help to lessen the blow this coming week.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:35 am

Damn, one more loss and Kansas could have played themselves into a #1 seed.

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:56 am

Ernst Stavro Blofeld wrote:One may blow up Kansas and the world may not hear about it.

Thomas Frank wrote:
There is something in the state that creates real geniuses of averageness. But it's also this weird kind of averageness. It's definitely the place where test-marketers go, but it's not a normal kind of averageness; it's almost an outraged 'averageness,' an exceptionally determined will to be 'average.'

salim'sheadband · Post by **salim'sheadband** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:22 pm

It is unbelievable how weak-minded this Kansas team is:

enfuego · Post by **enfuego** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 1:25 pm

Oregon - Kenpom 46
Iowa State - Kenpom 13

Keep crowing about that dominant win over a crappy team.

WildcatStunner · Post by **WildcatStunner** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 1:30 pm

enfuego wrote:Oregon - Kenpom 46
Iowa State - Kenpom 13

Keep crowing about that dominant win over a crappy team.

You keep on crowing about those moral victories.

dirtbags · Post by **dirtbags** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 1:39 pm

Arizona - kenpom 2
ku - fell out of the kenpom top 10

shrug.

Zero · Post by **Zero** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 1:47 pm

Whichever 1 seed gets Kansas as it's 2 is going to be very happy. They won't even make it to the second weekend. Notre Dame should be getting that 2 seed.

pokinmik · Post by **pokinmik** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 1:48 pm

Zero wrote:Whichever 1 seed gets Kansas as it's 2 is going to be very happy. They won't even make it to the second weekend. Notre Dame should be getting that 2 seed.

Def. Kansas as a 2 is a gift from the gods for whichever 1 is with them.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 2:51 pm

salim'sheadband wrote:It is unbelievable how weak-minded this Kansas team is:

I was assured Kansas knew how to put teams away.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:04 pm

Weakest 2 seed. Should have been a 3.

azcat34 · Post by **azcat34** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:05 pm

Won't make it out of 2nd round, Wichita State will beat them.

enfuego · Post by **enfuego** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:13 pm

enfuego wrote:
SCCats wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:How about a side bet that a seven-loss team isn't getting a 2 seed.
Of course for Kansas that's the bet I'm proposing. But Enfuego will say he didn't come back today or tomorrow or whatever other day he needs to say to not technically be a part of the bet because he knows what will happen.

The important lesson here actually is for the lower boards: when you know what a person's disposition is, when you know what a nation is going to do, you can use that against them. Here, there, wherever: I know what your disposition is, and I can use it against you to trap you. To put you in an untenable place.

Here Enfuego will NEVER respond to my bet. He can't; he's in a lose/lose spot. And what's the worse case for me? I lose $100?

I've won before he's even responded because I've trapped him into saying Kansas is a 2 seed.
Kansas deserves a 2 seed. Why would I bet on something which the team can't control (no, they can't control the politics of the committee member's bias). It's been a while since KU last played Arizona and gave your team a beat down. Maybe Arizona will be the three seed in our Bracket in the Midwest Region this March?

Someone owes me $100.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:19 pm

Someone doesn't know how bets work.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:19 pm

enfuego wrote:
enfuego wrote:
SCCats wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:How about a side bet that a seven-loss team isn't getting a 2 seed.
Of course for Kansas that's the bet I'm proposing. But Enfuego will say he didn't come back today or tomorrow or whatever other day he needs to say to not technically be a part of the bet because he knows what will happen.

The important lesson here actually is for the lower boards: when you know what a person's disposition is, when you know what a nation is going to do, you can use that against them. Here, there, wherever: I know what your disposition is, and I can use it against you to trap you. To put you in an untenable place.

Here Enfuego will NEVER respond to my bet. He can't; he's in a lose/lose spot. And what's the worse case for me? I lose $100?

I've won before he's even responded because I've trapped him into saying Kansas is a 2 seed.
Kansas deserves a 2 seed. Why would I bet on something which the team can't control (no, they can't control the politics of the committee member's bias). It's been a while since KU last played Arizona and gave your team a beat down. Maybe Arizona will be the three seed in our Bracket in the Midwest Region this March?
Someone owes me $100.

This is when I wish we still had that rolling/laughing emoticon.

enfuego · Post by **enfuego** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:24 pm

Chicat wrote:
enfuego wrote:
enfuego wrote:
SCCats wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:How about a side bet that a seven-loss team isn't getting a 2 seed.
Of course for Kansas that's the bet I'm proposing. But Enfuego will say he didn't come back today or tomorrow or whatever other day he needs to say to not technically be a part of the bet because he knows what will happen.

The important lesson here actually is for the lower boards: when you know what a person's disposition is, when you know what a nation is going to do, you can use that against them. Here, there, wherever: I know what your disposition is, and I can use it against you to trap you. To put you in an untenable place.

Here Enfuego will NEVER respond to my bet. He can't; he's in a lose/lose spot. And what's the worse case for me? I lose $100?

I've won before he's even responded because I've trapped him into saying Kansas is a 2 seed.
Kansas deserves a 2 seed. Why would I bet on something which the team can't control (no, they can't control the politics of the committee member's bias). It's been a while since KU last played Arizona and gave your team a beat down. Maybe Arizona will be the three seed in our Bracket in the Midwest Region this March?
Someone owes me $100.
This is when I wish we still had that rolling/laughing emoticon.

I didn't take the bet, because I knew this guy wouldn't pay up. I bumped this merely for the comedic stupidity of his purported "lesson for the lower boards" babbling which in retrospect he put himself into a custom fit clown suit.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:26 pm

The only clown here is you enflamo.

enfuego · Post by **enfuego** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:42 pm

I think UA got a gift for staying in the West. Kansas in the toughest region top to bottom. South the weakest region. Bad overall seeding by the committee this year.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:43 pm

enfuego wrote:I think UA got a gift for staying in the West. Kansas in the toughest region top to bottom. South the weakest region. Bad overall seeding by the committee this year.

What double digit seed is beating you guys this year?

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:45 pm

Wsu or Indiana are bouncing Kansas next weekend

dirtbags · Post by **dirtbags** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:48 pm

congrats to ku for the extremely favorable draw. no excuse for the jaywalks to not make a deep deep run. see u in indy, kansans.

enfuego · Post by **enfuego** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:52 pm

dirtbags wrote:congrats to ku for the extremely favorable draw. no excuse for the jaywalks to not make a deep deep run. see u in indy, kansans.

Favorable draw? BS. Everyone is calling it the toughest region. I think Arizona should be worried as a #2 seed. I believe Arizona holds the record for the number of first and second round flame outs as a #2 seed.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 4:03 pm

enfuego wrote:
dirtbags wrote:congrats to ku for the extremely favorable draw. no excuse for the jaywalks to not make a deep deep run. see u in indy, kansans.
Favorable draw? BS. Everyone is calling it the toughest region. I think Arizona should be worried as a #2 seed. I believe Arizona holds the record for the number of first and second round flame outs as a #2 seed.

Oh yeah?

dirtbags · Post by **dirtbags** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 4:11 pm

for a team like ku? pfft. easy peasy! i've got kansas penciled in to at least the ff for all the reasons you've outlined in this thread. and everyone knows omaha + cleveland = lawrence, so enjoy the home crowd advantage. i know i will be hugely disappointed if ku falls short of hardware in indy. chalk rock jaywalk and such!

Main Event · Post by **Main Event** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 4:16 pm

enfuego wrote:
Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.
Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.

lol

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=13732227

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 4:18 pm

Main Event wrote:
enfuego wrote:
Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.
Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.
lol

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=13732227

His own fan base thinks he's a dipshit.

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 4:29 pm

azgreg wrote: His own fan base thinks he's a dipshit.

They're right.

Harvey Specter · Post by **Harvey Specter** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 5:31 pm

Main Event wrote:
enfuego wrote:
Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.
Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.
lol

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=13732227

Enfuego seems to have a similar mindset to KU & Arizona as BeachCat has to Arizona and UCLA.

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:27 pm

Harvey Specter wrote:
Main Event wrote:
enfuego wrote:
Puerco wrote:Battle tested. In every game.
Are you talking about Arizona's performance against UCLA last night? This is Arizona's year to do something, because next year is a rebuilding year. You lose McConnell to the business world, Tarczewski to Europe, Ashley to the NBDL, and Jefferson and Johnson to the NBA. I don't care who your incoming class is that is a lot of experience to replace.
lol

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=13732227
Enfuego seems to have a similar mindset to KU & Arizona as BeachCat has to Arizona and UCLA.

That was my thought exactly.

Login • Register