Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:56 am
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
I didn't read this thread but can tell by it's length and the title that is bullshit.
Can we stop making stupid fucking threads like this.
Can we stop making stupid fucking threads like this.
-
- Posts: 30198
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
- Reputation: 1849
- Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Amen.luteformayor2 wrote:I didn't read this thread but can tell by it's length and the title that is bullshit.
Can we stop making stupid fucking threads like this.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Just be prepared because people will dig and find something to complain about when there's nothing on the surface to focus on.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
As soon as I saw who started this thread I knew it was all bullshit.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Come on, you guys! This one is obvious. I mean a guy who lead his HS team to four straight championships, while playing whichever position on the court, potentially to the detriment of his national rankings, has GOT to be a me-first ball-hogging chemistry issue, right? Next thing you know, ODogg will start posting photos of him stoned in bed.
'A parent is the one person who is supposed to make their kid think they can do anything. Says they're beautiful even when they're ugly. Thinks they're smart even when they go to Arizona State.' -- Jack Donaghy
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
NEW RULES FOR THIS FORUM
No open discussion
No opinions or thoughts that are anti-consensus
No not being a homer
No speculation, ever, without blood proof
No questioning anything, just to question it.
Nice guys, I mean girls.
No open discussion
No opinions or thoughts that are anti-consensus
No not being a homer
No speculation, ever, without blood proof
No questioning anything, just to question it.
Nice guys, I mean girls.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
This thread is idiotic. The season can't start soon enough, so we can have some real discussion on here.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Spare us the Drama Queen act.Bosy Billups wrote:NEW RULES FOR THIS FORUM
No open discussion
No opinions or thoughts that are anti-consensus
No not being a homer
No speculation, ever, without blood proof
No questioning anything, just to question it.
Nice guys, I mean girls.
You don't want "open discussion", you want people who agree with you. I see plenty of "open discussion" in this thread, but when you get some blow back for your topic/post you suddenly take the role of victim! OH NO! I WAS JUST HAVING AN OPINION! WHY CAN'T I HAVE AN OPINION!
Nonsense.
Oh...and this?....
Is junk.Bosy Billups wrote:But bottom line, as of today, there is an issue, or a potential issue, and it's probably w/ SJ.
as of today, _____ is true, or potentially true.
you can fill in the blanks with anything and you've got a 'true' statement.
I'm not even talking about whether there IS an issue, just the way you've chosen to phrase it is junk. Again, you don't want a discussion, you want to be right and you want people to agree with you.
gumby wrote:Actually, you haven't demonstrated this yet. But I love how you constructed that escape hatch with "potentially."Bosy Billups wrote:But bottom line, as of today, there is an issue, or a potential issue, and it's probably w/ SJ.
Funny isn't it.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
- Chicat
- Posts: 46656
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3988
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Discuss anything you want. Just be prepared to be ridiculed if your opinion/theory is wholly without merit.Bosy Billups wrote:NEW RULES FOR THIS FORUM
No open discussion
No opinions or thoughts that are anti-consensus
No not being a homer
No speculation, ever, without blood proof
No questioning anything, just to question it.
Nice guys, I mean girls.
And speculation is fine, but if it's based on nothing more than the foul emanations of your own anus, then be prepared to see people tell you that your shit stinks.
Did you honestly think that you were just going to throw out this theory and everyone was going to tell you what a genius you are?
This. Thread. Is. An. Abortion. Don't get butthurt when people point that out. There's far more evidence that this thread sucks a syphilitic penis than Stanley Johnson is some kind of bad teammate.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Just so you know, when you submit this post, you sign up for Percy status.Bosy Billups wrote:NEW RULES FOR THIS FORUM
No open discussion
No opinions or thoughts that are anti-consensus
No not being a homer
No speculation, ever, without blood proof
No questioning anything, just to question it.
Nice guys, I mean girls.
As if it's the board's fault for being some kind of "herd" when, in fact, you're the one creating consensus by claiming something so baseless that there's no option but for everyone to agree that there's no real open discussion to be had. It isn't about "blood proof." You could argue for an unpopular opinion. Many of us do that all the time, and we disagree with one another. But you're just speculating on a circumstance without giving any reason for our consideration. If I start a thread arguing that Miller's comments about chemistry point to the unwillingness of York, Pitts, and Allen to accept their roles on this year's team, that discussion won't go anywhere, either.
Last edited by Longhorned on Sun Oct 26, 2014 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
We need a thread about Mayes. Or Kreal.
'A parent is the one person who is supposed to make their kid think they can do anything. Says they're beautiful even when they're ugly. Thinks they're smart even when they go to Arizona State.' -- Jack Donaghy
-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:56 am
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
The new board has developed enough where we have are beginning to get Percys. YES! SUCCESS!Bosy Billups wrote:NEW RULES FOR THIS FORUM
No open discussion
No opinions or thoughts that are anti-consensus
No not being a homer
No speculation, ever, without blood proof
No questioning anything, just to question it.
Nice guys, I mean girls.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
What a joke.
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
The responses from some of you in this thread is making me think twice about starting a"Sean Miller may have herpes" thread
I am entitled to my opinion!!!
I am entitled to my opinion!!!
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Larry Scott has hemorrhoids.
I am entitled to my opinion!!!!
I am entitled to my opinion!!!!
- Chicat
- Posts: 46656
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3988
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Larry Scott is a hemorrhoid.
Stanley Johnson is a great teammate by all accounts.
Stanley Johnson is a great teammate by all accounts.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
I heard he just drank the last of the milk and put it back in the fridge and didn't refill the Brita pitcher. We are doomed and will flame out in the first round.
Damn you Stanley!
Damn you Stanley!
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Still strokin that hard on for me eh, Puerco?Puerco wrote:Come on, you guys! This one is obvious. I mean a guy who lead his HS team to four straight championships, while playing whichever position on the court, potentially to the detriment of his national rankings, has GOT to be a me-first ball-hogging chemistry issue, right? Next thing you know, ODogg will start posting photos of him stoned in bed.
I know there aren't chemistry issues or other issues with SJ, aside from the fact that he is a highly regarded freshman with alot of attention on him.
If you or others are looking for Josiah-ish problems, there aren't any there.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Yeah, but Johnson is the problem, based on stuff people are hearing, which is based on ... I dunno .. free-basing.97cats wrote:FTR -- Johnson lives with Ristic and Allen
Right where I want to be.
- JMarkJohns
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:28 am
- Reputation: 174
- Location: VforVindication
- Contact:
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Underrated and underappreciated aspect of Chemistry is, while important to structure on offense, helping to create open shots, defensive scrambling chaos, and precision passing, it's actually of much more importance to defense, it's timing, rotations, exactness and type of help, the spacing and positioning for rebounding positioning, and secondary recovery should an offensive board be given up.
Knowing Miller, his emphasis on defense, and exactly who Arizona lost defensively last year, I think it's incredibly superficial to think of Miller's stressing of chemistry as an offensive issue stemming from selfishness, and not defensive issues stemming from losing two of the top-5 defenders in the nation, unfamiliarity to new roles and positions, and developed timing and precision to defend at an elite level without fouling.
Last year spoiled us. The defense will never come that easily again.
Playing structured defense as a unit of 8 rotation players is difficult. Add to this the turnover, the evolution of roles, and Miller's emphasis on contesting without reckless abandon or fouls, and you have my interpretation of Millers early chemistry emphasis.
Defense
Not offense.
But that's just my opinion.
Knowing Miller, his emphasis on defense, and exactly who Arizona lost defensively last year, I think it's incredibly superficial to think of Miller's stressing of chemistry as an offensive issue stemming from selfishness, and not defensive issues stemming from losing two of the top-5 defenders in the nation, unfamiliarity to new roles and positions, and developed timing and precision to defend at an elite level without fouling.
Last year spoiled us. The defense will never come that easily again.
Playing structured defense as a unit of 8 rotation players is difficult. Add to this the turnover, the evolution of roles, and Miller's emphasis on contesting without reckless abandon or fouls, and you have my interpretation of Millers early chemistry emphasis.
Defense
Not offense.
But that's just my opinion.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Sarcasm, ODogg. Miss me, don't you?Olsondogg wrote:Still strokin that hard on for me eh, Puerco?Puerco wrote:Come on, you guys! This one is obvious. I mean a guy who lead his HS team to four straight championships, while playing whichever position on the court, potentially to the detriment of his national rankings, has GOT to be a me-first ball-hogging chemistry issue, right? Next thing you know, ODogg will start posting photos of him stoned in bed.
I know there aren't chemistry issues or other issues with SJ, aside from the fact that he is a highly regarded freshman with alot of attention on him.
If you or others are looking for Josiah-ish problems, there aren't any there.
'A parent is the one person who is supposed to make their kid think they can do anything. Says they're beautiful even when they're ugly. Thinks they're smart even when they go to Arizona State.' -- Jack Donaghy
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Nope. But me being referenced by you in several posts over different threads shows you do.
I am so honored.
I am so honored.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
At the R&B game it felt like SJ was out of sync with his teammates. They didn't seem to pass much to him and vice versa. You can just tell when a team is happy and playing together and I def got the SJ against the world vibe. Good news is everyone else look to be working together besides parker.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Good. My mission is complete then.Olsondogg wrote:Nope. But me being referenced by you in several posts over different threads shows you do.
I am so honored.
'A parent is the one person who is supposed to make their kid think they can do anything. Says they're beautiful even when they're ugly. Thinks they're smart even when they go to Arizona State.' -- Jack Donaghy
- Merkin
- Posts: 43424
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Miller agrees with you, and what he said about SJ after the game (from above):elriop20 wrote:At the R&B game it felt like SJ was out of sync with his teammates. They didn't seem to pass much to him and vice versa. You can just tell when a team is happy and playing together and I def got the SJ against the world vibe. Good news is everyone else look to be working together besides parker.
"What we're trying to teach him is all the intricacies of college defense and how to play with other good players and utilize our offense to create good opportunities," Miller said. "If you watch us 10 days from now or three weeks from now, I would hope you'd see him using our offense to be more efficient and be a better defender. And he'll do that every day."
But Johnson is just 18, and has been "the man" his whole life on the court. He'll adjust.
- Bear Down Vegas
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:39 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
JMarkJohns wrote:Underrated and underappreciated aspect of Chemistry is, while important to structure on offense, helping to create open shots, defensive scrambling chaos, and precision passing, it's actually of much more importance to defense, it's timing, rotations, exactness and type of help, the spacing and positioning for rebounding positioning, and secondary recovery should an offensive board be given up.
Knowing Miller, his emphasis on defense, and exactly who Arizona lost defensively last year, I think it's incredibly superficial to think of Miller's stressing of chemistry as an offensive issue stemming from selfishness, and not defensive issues stemming from losing two of the top-5 defenders in the nation, unfamiliarity to new roles and positions, and developed timing and precision to defend at an elite level without fouling.
Last year spoiled us. The defense will never come that easily again.
Playing structured defense as a unit of 8 rotation players is difficult. Add to this the turnover, the evolution of roles, and Miller's emphasis on contesting without reckless abandon or fouls, and you have my interpretation of Millers early chemistry emphasis.
Defense
Not offense.
But that's just my opinion.
Thank you very much for this JMJ. I didn't read into it the way some have but even if there is a hint of the reference there - this makes much more sense. It's too early to say it any other way. In my very uneducated but not so humble opinion.
- RichardCranium
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:53 pm
- Reputation: 180
- Location: The Wonderful Land Of Oz
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
As a freshman, Johnson won't be taking Organic Chemistry, that is a Sophomore subject. Organic Chem is the one that turned me from a Chem/Physics major to Engineering. If he stays around for his sophomore year (yeah, right!) he will have proven that he is ready for Organic Chemistry.
Freshman Physical Chemistry is pretty straightforward if you can remember the consequences of spin and charge; I understand he is already intimately familiar with the weights so picking up the valences should be easy. He's gonna excite the fans and put the whole team into a higher energy orbit.
Freshman Physical Chemistry is pretty straightforward if you can remember the consequences of spin and charge; I understand he is already intimately familiar with the weights so picking up the valences should be easy. He's gonna excite the fans and put the whole team into a higher energy orbit.
Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook.
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
From a source based on early practices:
Stanley Johnson: It’s going to take the first part of the season for him to find his groove and be the stud we’re all expecting. Don’t expect that player out of the gate. His size and strength is obvious and formidable. He can go anywhere he wants on the floor and nobody is going to keep him from that spot. He still needs to realize that this team has a ton of offensive weapons and he doesn’t need to be the primary scorer all the time. He is a great passer, but doesn’t do it very much. On the occasions that he does, it works out great, especially when he’s throwing an alley-oop to Rondae. He is capable of knocking most shots down, including the 3-ball, but needs to learn to take them within the flow of the offense.
Stanley Johnson: It’s going to take the first part of the season for him to find his groove and be the stud we’re all expecting. Don’t expect that player out of the gate. His size and strength is obvious and formidable. He can go anywhere he wants on the floor and nobody is going to keep him from that spot. He still needs to realize that this team has a ton of offensive weapons and he doesn’t need to be the primary scorer all the time. He is a great passer, but doesn’t do it very much. On the occasions that he does, it works out great, especially when he’s throwing an alley-oop to Rondae. He is capable of knocking most shots down, including the 3-ball, but needs to learn to take them within the flow of the offense.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46656
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3988
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
A freshman will need time to become accustomed to working with other high level players and knowing his role on the team?
That is simply shocking...
That is simply shocking...
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
That is a source?
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
the team is sick of playing against and beating the crap out of each other -- when it's someone else and:
McConnell
Johnson
Jefferson
Ashley
Tarczewski
are playing together, Arizona and Johnson will be HUGE.
McConnell
Johnson
Jefferson
Ashley
Tarczewski
are playing together, Arizona and Johnson will be HUGE.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
I just hope we don't lose the secret scrimmage though...it was disastrous for us last year.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Yeah, it's a wonder Miller keeps bringing them in. Just asking for trouble.Chicat wrote:A freshman will need time to become accustomed to working with other high level players and knowing his role on the team?
That is simply shocking...
Right where I want to be.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Lay off on Miller. He's just not as focused on freshman as we all were last year.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
- Merkin
- Posts: 43424
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
I googled: Sean Miller freshman chemistry aaron gordon rondae hollis-jefferson
and got this, don't get the reference.
and got this, don't get the reference.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:29 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
More like reading into it way too much.Merkin wrote:Just reading between the lines from Miller's quotes on SJ.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Question: "Rondae, what's your scouting report on Stanley Johnson?"
RHJ: "My scouting report? He's one of the best of the best"
Question: "How do you guard him?"
RHJ: "You can't."
RHJ: "My scouting report? He's one of the best of the best"
Question: "How do you guard him?"
RHJ: "You can't."
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
- Daryl Zero
- Posts: 2447
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:00 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
RHJ is certainly confirming how selfish SJ is, he won't let people guard him.Olsondogg wrote:Question: "Rondae, what's your scouting report on Stanley Johnson?"
RHJ: "My scouting report? He's one of the best of the best"
Question: "How do you guard him?"
RHJ: "You can't."
Erlich Bachmann: Richard wrote the code, yes, but the inspiration was clear. Let me ask you something. How fast do you think you could jack off every guy in this room? Cause I know how long it would take me. And I could prove it.
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Haha, this was a real LOL.Daryl Zero wrote:RHJ is certainly confirming how selfish SJ is, he won't let people guard him.Olsondogg wrote:Question: "Rondae, what's your scouting report on Stanley Johnson?"
RHJ: "My scouting report? He's one of the best of the best"
Question: "How do you guard him?"
RHJ: "You can't."
Okay, I'm convinced the issue isn't with him, it's with the bench players. Probably the guards, is my hunch.
Fix? Let Pitts Red-Shirt
Sincerely,
The Chemist
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Haha!Daryl Zero wrote:RHJ is certainly confirming how selfish SJ is, he won't let people guard him.Olsondogg wrote:Question: "Rondae, what's your scouting report on Stanley Johnson?"
RHJ: "My scouting report? He's one of the best of the best"
Question: "How do you guard him?"
RHJ: "You can't."
I'm just waiting till November 14th. We'll beat Mount Saint Marys by 30, and we'll all have a good time arguing about how it should have been 50 if we were any good. Can't wait.
- CalStateTempe
- Posts: 16649
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:46 pm
- Reputation: 582
- Location: The Right to Self-Determination: FREEDOM!!!!
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Clicked on page 2 to catch up on recent history.luteformayor2 wrote:I didn't read this thread but can tell by it's length and the title that is bullshit.
Can we stop making stupid fucking threads like this.
Great post! Don't need to read anymore.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
I know Stanley Johnson;
So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies. Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about.
But trust me.... You don't.
I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about.
This is how bad info gets passed around.
If you dont know about the topic....Dont make yourself sound like you do.
Cos some fans believe anything they hear.
So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies. Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about.
But trust me.... You don't.
I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about.
This is how bad info gets passed around.
If you dont know about the topic....Dont make yourself sound like you do.
Cos some fans believe anything they hear.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
Clearly this is the biggest problem. We have all the talent in the world, but clearly with SJ in chemistry disappears.
- Merkin
- Posts: 43424
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
He still is getting passed the ball. Let's see how long that lasts.
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
I really hoped jack a three would end with Lyons. Don't let that name get stuck to you Stanley...
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
i did notice a few times in the 2nd half where stanley was wide open on the wing, arms in the air, clap clap, yo i'm open, etc. and no one dished to him. not worth reading too much into at this point, but... yeah, let's see how long that lasts, too.Merkin wrote:He still is getting passed the ball. Let's see how long that lasts.
- Bosy Billups
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:20 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
He needs to earn his stripes before the chemistry is solidified.
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
R-E-L-A-X
Re: Stanley Johnson Chemistry Thread
We are too good, too deep, and have too many options for Stanley to fall into a chuck'em trap. He'll find that if he does what he does well on this team, he will get tons of opportunities. He is our best pure late-in-shot-clock-need-an-iso player already, and will only get better. Lyons was Lyons because we had to have Lyons on the court. Plus, despite this bizarro thread, I have never heard complaints about Stanley Johnson being a head case. Strong willed, confident, used to being the man...sure. But he will conform to the needs of this team, and within that conformity, he will learn how this system will actually give him fantastic, efficient opportunities. If he keeps seeing the cutter, then becoming that cutter the next possession, with the passing ability of BAsh and TJ...he and Rondae are going to have numerous one on one opportunities at the basket.
Stanley will get his. And he will learn he can't just make it happen as he wants like in high school, so he will come to the fold. He isn't a bad kid, or a selfish kid. He's just a star with an eye on the league. Thing is, we have a whole team of those, and they learn. This team was already coming around and feeding off the energy of the baseline screen layups and steal-to-dunks. Playing correctly within this system means winning, and winning is a lot of fun
Stanley will get his. And he will learn he can't just make it happen as he wants like in high school, so he will come to the fold. He isn't a bad kid, or a selfish kid. He's just a star with an eye on the league. Thing is, we have a whole team of those, and they learn. This team was already coming around and feeding off the energy of the baseline screen layups and steal-to-dunks. Playing correctly within this system means winning, and winning is a lot of fun