UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns

UAEebs86
Posts: 30198
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
Reputation: 1849
Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by UAEebs86 »

User avatar
AZCatGirl
Posts: 10303
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 1:06 pm
Reputation: 1275

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by AZCatGirl »

I'm saying this not having watched a full UCLA game, but it feels like the players have quit on Mick. Only question is how much longer will their AD let this go on?
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43424
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Merkin »

AZCatGirl wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:01 pm I'm saying this not having watched a full UCLA game, but it feels like the players have quit on Mick. Only question is how much longer will their AD let this go on?
I was thinking the same thing. Reminds me of the Ben Lindsey year when the players quit on him, and made the Cats look worse than they really were.

Will owe Mick $20M, but will save a bit if they wait until the season is over.

https://www.si.com/college/ucla/mens-ba ... %20clinics.

Either side would have to pay $24 million to break off the deal before March 31, 2023, $20 million before March 31, 2024, $16 million before March 31, 2025, $10 million before March 31, 2026, $6 million before March 31, 2027, and $2 million before March 31, 2028.
MrBug708
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 441

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by MrBug708 »

They will always have basketball money buyout money but he is in danger of equaling the 10-19 year that was awful
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
KaibabKat wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:17 pm Who do you suppose will be the head coach at UCLA next year?
Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Beachcat97
Posts: 8596
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 470
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Beachcat97 »

He was their 4th choice of coach. Not surprising that things are going this way.

Their last two hires are Alford and Cronin. Those aren’t the kind of names top programs hire. And their next coach won’t be much better.
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

Listen Cronin as robbed these guys of any confidence and has demoralized the young men that chose to come to UCLA. I am confident that a lot of these guys, especially Mack, will be in the portal at year-end. Mack is a good player who Cronin says would play only 5 minutes on a experienced team. How about pumping him up while talking about room for improvement? No ..that would shine the light on the coach not getting the maximum from his players. While I always want to beat the hell out of the Bruins you have to feel sorry for the players that are playing with no hint of happiness or hope. They have pride, they want to win, they want to get NIL money and they have a coach that is making that more difficult.
Last edited by TheCat on Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
UAEebs86
Posts: 30198
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
Reputation: 1849
Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by UAEebs86 »

TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:50 am Listen Cronin as robbed these guys of any confidence and has demoralized the young men that chose to come to UCLA. I am confident that a lot of these guys, especially Mack, will be in the portal at year-end. Mack is a good player who Cronin says would play only 5 minutes on a experienced team. How about pumping him up while talking about room for approval? No ..that would shine the light on the coach not getting the maximum from his players. While I always want to beat the hell out of the Bruins you have to feel sorry for the players that are playing with no hint of happiness or hope. They have pride, they want to win, they want to get NIL money and they have a coach that is making that more difficult.
If this was 20 years ago this could have had a Mackovician ending with the players going to the ADs office. Now they can just transfer.

Bold strategy Cotton.
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 16751
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Reputation: 2144
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dovecanyoncat »

In the time of NIL Mick keeps talking "loyalty". But it's actually a gimp suit, ball gag and Get back in the trunk BITCH!
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 16751
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Reputation: 2144
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dovecanyoncat »

UAEebs86 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:57 pm
Imagine going through life with the Name Rod Palmer. I mean ..... jesus fucking christ.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43424
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Merkin »

His dad probably knew he wouldn't be around. Just left him an old guitar and an empty bottle of booze. But he grew up quick and he grew up mean.
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 16751
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Reputation: 2144
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dovecanyoncat »

His Dad Harry and his Mom Rose were just mad at the world.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
Beachcat97
Posts: 8596
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 470
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Beachcat97 »

I can’t believe Cronin ditched the press conference last night. He made some remark recently about his players not being able to cry for mommy. Well, it sure looks like Micro Mick was sobbing under his bed last night while his assistant faced the media. Unbelievable.
MrBug708
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 441

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by MrBug708 »

TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:37 am
MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
KaibabKat wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:17 pm Who do you suppose will be the head coach at UCLA next year?
Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Mick's complaint with UCLA is he can't afford the NIL game right now. Not sure that would be a problem at Louisville.
User avatar
84Cat
Posts: 19886
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:17 pm
Reputation: 1075
Location: Boise

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by 84Cat »

User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 16751
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Reputation: 2144
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dovecanyoncat »

Heeeeey! We're not the only ones to push that meme!! Way to go knuckleheads!!!
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

MrBug708 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:06 am
TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:37 am
MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
KaibabKat wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:17 pm Who do you suppose will be the head coach at UCLA next year?
Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Mick's complaint with UCLA is he can't afford the NIL game right now. Not sure that would be a problem at Louisville.
Uh....you had a freshman last year that bought a porsche for himself and for his mom. Don't tell me guys can't get NIL money in Los Angeles.
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

84Cat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 1:51 pm
Sharks are circling because of his demeanor as much as performance.

https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/sto ... onsibility
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 16751
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Reputation: 2144
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dovecanyoncat »

From the linked LA Times article: Aptitude? As to teaching, my Father taught college students for 66 years. I remember him saying two things: You cannot teach anyone who doesn't first grasp that there is something they don't know, that is, they must admit they are ignorant. Next, the same goes for teachers: they, as well, are taught by students, and will not actually teach if unable to admit to needing to be taught. Ultimately, learning to learn is what student and teacher provide each other.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
MrBug708
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 441

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by MrBug708 »

TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:25 pm
MrBug708 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:06 am
TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:37 am
MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
KaibabKat wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:17 pm Who do you suppose will be the head coach at UCLA next year?
Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Mick's complaint with UCLA is he can't afford the NIL game right now. Not sure that would be a problem at Louisville.
Uh....you had a freshman last year that bought a porsche for himself and for his mom. Don't tell me guys can't get NIL money in Los Angeles.
You are confusing athlete's brand portfolio with schools paying players. Amari Bailey was collecting money long before he was committed to UCLA because he had a large social media presence. Drake also took his mom on a date to Dodger Stadium. Bailey didn't come to UCLA for money...lol
User avatar
CatsbyAZ
Posts: 2523
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 12:35 pm
Reputation: 172
Location: San Diego CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by CatsbyAZ »

What a disaster
And I said, ‘That last thing is what you can't get...Nobody can get to that last thing. We keep on living in hopes of catching it once and for all.’ Jack Kerouac, On The Road
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

MrBug708 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 5:04 pm
TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:25 pm
MrBug708 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:06 am
TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:37 am
MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm

Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Mick's complaint with UCLA is he can't afford the NIL game right now. Not sure that would be a problem at Louisville.
Uh....you had a freshman last year that bought a porsche for himself and for his mom. Don't tell me guys can't get NIL money in Los Angeles.
You are confusing athlete's brand portfolio with schools paying players. Amari Bailey was collecting money long before he was committed to UCLA because he had a large social media presence. Drake also took his mom on a date to Dodger Stadium. Bailey didn't come to UCLA for money...lol
Exactly what is his brand if not basketball? Schools are not the ones that provide real NIL money to athletes. Can't say why he went to UCLA or why he was drafted to tell the truth. I knew Drake was cheap.
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

MrBug708 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:06 am
TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:37 am
MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
KaibabKat wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:17 pm Who do you suppose will be the head coach at UCLA next year?
Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Mick's complaint with UCLA is he can't afford the NIL game right now. Not sure that would be a problem at Louisville.
BRO just reported that UCLA basketball is in the top 5 for NIL money. Not sure how they know that but whatever.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43424
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Merkin »

NIL money is all confidential, why would anyone know that?

The only reason we know JDL made $8K a month NIL money because of the court filing.

ON3 just does valuation, not the actual NIL money paid.
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

You would have to ask BRO how they know. We know for example KJ Lewis got an Audi from a dealership in Texas. Not sure of anything else for Az players because as you say it is private.
User avatar
U.P. Zona Fan
Posts: 2656
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:57 pm
Reputation: 414
Location: Big bay, MI

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by U.P. Zona Fan »

Didn't dalen terry get an ice cream flavor a couple years ago?
Arizona State might have the most surprisingly anemic history in men's basketball of any program that you might think is better than it is.
-Norlander.
UAEebs86
Posts: 30198
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
Reputation: 1849
Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by UAEebs86 »

U.P. Zona Fan wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:28 pm Didn't dalen terry get an ice cream flavor a couple years ago?
He tweeted trying to get an NIL hookup with Eegee's but I don't think it ever happened.
MrBug708
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 441

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by MrBug708 »

TheCat wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:55 pm
MrBug708 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:06 am
TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:37 am
MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
KaibabKat wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:17 pm Who do you suppose will be the head coach at UCLA next year?
Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Mick's complaint with UCLA is he can't afford the NIL game right now. Not sure that would be a problem at Louisville.
BRO just reported that UCLA basketball is in the top 5 for NIL money. Not sure how they know that but whatever.
The only I think I saw posted today by BRO literally said the opposite, that it's not top 5, so if you have a link handy...?
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

MrBug708 wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:06 pm
TheCat wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:55 pm
MrBug708 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:06 am
TheCat wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:37 am
MrBug708 wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm

Mick does look like he wants to be in Louisville next year
Louisville is not going to hire a coach with a terrible demeanor or isolates players.
Mick's complaint with UCLA is he can't afford the NIL game right now. Not sure that would be a problem at Louisville.
BRO just reported that UCLA basketball is in the top 5 for NIL money. Not sure how they know that but whatever.
The only I think I saw posted today by BRO literally said the opposite, that it's not top 5, so if you have a link handy...?
Looks like he changed the article. Here is a reference on another UCLA site that says the article changed.
https://www.bruinzone.com/b12/messages/17329.shtml

Or maybe it was just poorly written and now says adequate.
MrBug708
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 441

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by MrBug708 »

Sounds like the Bruinzone guy misread the quote, but it could have been a typo. UCLA has long been cheap, not sure why anyone would believe they suddenly became top dollar in the world of NIL.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43424
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Merkin »

UCLA needs another Sam Gilbert.
MrBug708
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 441

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by MrBug708 »

Those haircuts were a game changer!
User avatar
Alieberman
Posts: 13841
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
Reputation: 2885
Location: I can't find my pants

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Alieberman »

I may have missed something...

But are we blaming UCLA's piss poor shit basketball on NIL?
User avatar
arizonawildcats
Posts: 1633
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2022 5:11 pm
Reputation: 269

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by arizonawildcats »

Mick is doing that.
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

MrBug708 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:54 am Sounds like the Bruinzone guy misread the quote, but it could have been a typo. UCLA has long been cheap, not sure why anyone would believe they suddenly became top dollar in the world of NIL.
UCLA being cheap has nothing to do with players getting deals for their image and likeness. You think USC coordinated Caleb's deals? Arizona did not reach out to a car dealership in Texas to get an Audi for one of their players.
User avatar
wyo-cat
Posts: 7791
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 6:27 pm
Reputation: 506
Location: Dusty Mexican Borderlands

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by wyo-cat »

Nothing is Mick’s fault.

What a lame ass. Dude should man up at some point and take some blame. At least his players might respect him for it and start playing.
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 16751
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Reputation: 2144
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dovecanyoncat »

His latest presser was a soft-pedal. He got the news he fucked up.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
User avatar
IrishAzCat
Posts: 303
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 10:54 pm
Reputation: 649

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by IrishAzCat »

Image
MrBug708
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 441

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by MrBug708 »

TheCat wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 7:08 pm
MrBug708 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:54 am Sounds like the Bruinzone guy misread the quote, but it could have been a typo. UCLA has long been cheap, not sure why anyone would believe they suddenly became top dollar in the world of NIL.
UCLA being cheap has nothing to do with players getting deals for their image and likeness. You think USC coordinated Caleb's deals? Arizona did not reach out to a car dealership in Texas to get an Audi for one of their players.
That's an interesting take. Thanks for the insight!
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

MrBug708 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:23 pm
TheCat wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 7:08 pm
MrBug708 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:54 am Sounds like the Bruinzone guy misread the quote, but it could have been a typo. UCLA has long been cheap, not sure why anyone would believe they suddenly became top dollar in the world of NIL.
UCLA being cheap has nothing to do with players getting deals for their image and likeness. You think USC coordinated Caleb's deals? Arizona did not reach out to a car dealership in Texas to get an Audi for one of their players.
That's an interesting take. Thanks for the insight!
There is a huge difference between a NIL Deal and a NIL collective.

A NIL deal is an agreement or arrangement between a student-athlete and a third party, such as a brand, company or individual, where the student-athlete receives compensation for the use of their name, image and likeness.

NIL collectives are support networks for college athletes where donors pool together money to compensate athletes for their name, image and likeness. These independent organizations generate NIL deals for athletes at specific schools while operating separately from the schools themselves.

Each state has different requirements/regulations for their NIL and some states none at all. California is covered by state law and so is Arizona although the law may be different. A cottage industry has sprouted up to provide services to athletes in getting NIL deals. The reason you don't see Caleb (USC) in a USC uniform in his numerous commercials is that there must be permission granted by the University (trademark law). The NCAA and schools also have provision to protect corporate sponsors like NIKE or Coca Cola, IMG Sports etc.

The NCAA rules are pretty lax in all of this but they do prohibit pay for performance and as an inducement for RECRUITING.

Glad to be of service to you Mr. Bug. You can read the specifics for UCLA on their website. Their students are expected to discuss their NIL deal with coaches/administrators. The NCAA does not require this though.

The real money for SA's come from NIL deals not collectives.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43424
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Merkin »

TheCat wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:44 am The reason you don't see Caleb (USC) in a USC uniform in his numerous commercials is that there must be permission granted by the University (trademark law).
Good example here of that. No reference at all to the UA, especially the block A and cactus logo are missing.
UAEebs86 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 3:15 pm
Even the "preferred" UA collective shirts just have a name and number.

https://arizonaassist.com/products/cale ... -shirt-red

Image
User avatar
dovecanyoncat
Posts: 16751
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
Reputation: 2144
Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dovecanyoncat »

TheCat wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:44 am
MrBug708 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:23 pm
TheCat wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 7:08 pm
MrBug708 wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:54 am Sounds like the Bruinzone guy misread the quote, but it could have been a typo. UCLA has long been cheap, not sure why anyone would believe they suddenly became top dollar in the world of NIL.
UCLA being cheap has nothing to do with players getting deals for their image and likeness. You think USC coordinated Caleb's deals? Arizona did not reach out to a car dealership in Texas to get an Audi for one of their players.
That's an interesting take. Thanks for the insight!
There is a huge difference between a NIL Deal and a NIL collective.

A NIL deal is an agreement or arrangement between a student-athlete and a third party, such as a brand, company or individual, where the student-athlete receives compensation for the use of their name, image and likeness.

NIL collectives are support networks for college athletes where donors pool together money to compensate athletes for their name, image and likeness. These independent organizations generate NIL deals for athletes at specific schools while operating separately from the schools themselves.

Each state has different requirements/regulations for their NIL and some states none at all. California is covered by state law and so is Arizona although the law may be different. A cottage industry has sprouted up to provide services to athletes in getting NIL deals. The reason you don't see Caleb (USC) in a USC uniform in his numerous commercials is that there must be permission granted by the University (trademark law). The NCAA and schools also have provision to protect corporate sponsors like NIKE or Coca Cola, IMG Sports etc.

The NCAA rules are pretty lax in all of this but they do prohibit pay for performance and as an inducement for RECRUITING.

Glad to be of service to you Mr. Bug. You can read the specifics for UCLA on their website. Their students are expected to discuss their NIL deal with coaches/administrators. The NCAA does not require this though.

The real money for SA's come from NIL deals not collectives.
Thanks TC. So the deal(ers) are the funding source and the collectives are aggregators, all of which is mitigated by state, school, and NCAA. Surely there is a slot across the flow of funds for legal counsel to grab its taste and to play tricks within the wrinkle zone of "inducement for RECRUITING". Sounds like quite a fondue of influence for kids to dip into.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

~ Wilhoit's Law
gronk4heisman
Posts: 1736
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:01 pm
Reputation: 341

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by gronk4heisman »

Basically Mick knows that he needs to have twice as much NIL money as other schools to convince players to play for him.
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

Mara has gone from a potential lottery pick to less than 5 minutes per game in the last 4 PAC games. I never thought he was remotely a lottery but Peyton went from ball boy at UCLA to PRO so maybe it is just the environment. Mara can't rebound but is playing less at UCLA then he did for his professional team. Great recruiting pitch.
Last edited by TheCat on Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TheCat
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:11 pm
Reputation: 599

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by TheCat »

Here is a link to a UCLA site. The sharks are circling. https://www.bruinzone.com/b12/messages/17421.shtml

SI says no fear because his buyout is so large but if he wants to leave (louisville) he pays the same so don't expect Cronin to go anywhere.
User avatar
84Cat
Posts: 19886
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:17 pm
Reputation: 1075
Location: Boise

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by 84Cat »

TheCat wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:38 pm Here is a link to a UCLA site. The sharks are circling. https://www.bruinzone.com/b12/messages/17421.shtml

SI says no fear because his buyout is so large but if he wants to leave (louisville) he pays the same so don't expect Cronin to go anywhere.
That is one ugly ui. How can anyone read that site for more than a couple of minutes at a time?
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43424
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Merkin »

84Cat wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:42 pm
TheCat wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:38 pm Here is a link to a UCLA site. The sharks are circling. https://www.bruinzone.com/b12/messages/17421.shtml

SI says no fear because his buyout is so large but if he wants to leave (louisville) he pays the same so don't expect Cronin to go anywhere.
That is one ugly ui. How can anyone read that site for more than a couple of minutes at a time?
That looks like one of the original UA fan sites created in the 1990's. Just all text. UA????? something.

Pretty good site for knowledgeable posters.
dmjcat
Posts: 5560
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:58 pm
Reputation: 461

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by dmjcat »

Merkin wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:42 am UCLA needs another Sam Gilbert.
The amazing thing is that most UCLA fans don't even know who Sam Gilbert was (or refuse to admit they know)

https://www.esquire.com/sports/a5694/co ... tory-2009/

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm ... story.html

The dark side of the UCLA basketball dynasty
BY CHRIS DUFRESNE
JUNE 8, 2010 12 AM PT


John R. Wooden, who died Friday at age 99, left for the ages an exemplary body of work in which the rewards, ten-fold, outweighed the trials.

No rendering of Wooden’s legacy, though, is complete without mention of a man who influenced one of sport’s most unimpeachable dynasties:

Sam Gilbert.

If Wooden was the father figure of UCLA basketball, Gilbert was its shadowy one.

Gilbert was a small, burly, self-made man with unfettered devotion to the Bruins. He could be benevolent yet, to nose-poking reporters, a bully. He attended UCLA in the 1930s but did not graduate, later to make his fortune as a contractor.

UCLA players recalled his showing up after Bruins games in the 1960s, dispensing apples and oranges.

He forged bonds with many Bruins who helped hang 10 national championship banners from 1964 to 1975, the year Wooden retired.

Gilbert held dinners at his home, provided UCLA players with advice, counsel and much, much more. He was “Papa Sam” to UCLA’s parade of All-Americans — he even negotiated contracts, usually taking only a dollar, when the NBA beckoned various Bruins.

“There were two people I listened to,” former UCLA star Lucius Allen once told The Times. “Coach Wooden as long as we were between the lines. Outside the court — Sam Gilbert.”

Wooden was wary of Gilbert but generally turned a blind eye.

“Maybe I had tunnel vision,” Wooden once said. “I still don’t think he’s had any great impact on the basketball program.”

Gilbert’s influence ultimately helped land UCLA basketball on NCAA probation. In December 1981, UCLA was cited for nine infractions and received two years’ probation, which included a one-year NCAA tournament ban and an order to vacate its 1980 NCAA national title game appearance against Louisville.

The most serious allegation levied against Gilbert was that he co-signed a promissory note so a player could buy a car. The NCAA ordered UCLA to disassociate Gilbert from its recruiting process.

Larry Brown was UCLA’s basketball coach in 1980; none of the violations were tied to Wooden’s era.

A 1981 Times investigative series, which interviewed 45 people connected with the basketball program, established Gilbert as “a one-man clearing house who has enabled players and their families to receive goods and services usually at big discounts and sometimes at no cost.”

The paper quoted Brent Clark, an NCAA field investigator who said that, in 1977, he was told to drop his case in Westwood. “If I had spent a month in Los Angeles, I could have put them on indefinite suspension,” he said of UCLA. An NCAA spokesman disputed this claim, saying that Clark was living a “fantasy world.”

The Times established that Gilbert, during Wooden’s heyday, helped players get cars, clothes, airline tickets and scalpers’ prices for UCLA season tickets. Gilbert allegedly even arranged abortions for players’ girlfriends.

One former UCLA All-American told The Times: “What do you want me to say? That’s my school. I don’t want to see them take away all those championships.” Gilbert considered many NCAA rules arcane and silly.

Larry Farmer, who played for Wooden and later became head coach, remarked of Gilbert: “I saw him move mountains.”

The Times’ investigation concluded Gilbert probably committed several NCAA violations in his dealings with UCLA players.

Wooden, in 1981, told The Times: “There’s as much crookedness as you want to find. There was something Abraham Lincoln said — he’d rather trust and be disappointed than distrust and be miserable all the time. Maybe I trusted too much.”

Times reporters Mike Littwin and Alan Greenberg opined:

“ . . . Wooden knew about Gilbert. He knew the players were close to Gilbert. He knew they looked to Gilbert for advice. Maybe he knew more. He should have known much more. If he didn’t, it was only because he apparently chose not to look.”

Gilbert died, at age 74, in 1987, four days before federal prosecutors, unaware of his passing, indicted him for racketeering and money laundering.

“I tried my best,” Wooden told the Basketball Times in 2005, “. . . My conscience is clear.”
Beachcat97
Posts: 8596
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 470
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Beachcat97 »

TheCat wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:38 pm Here is a link to a UCLA site. The sharks are circling. https://www.bruinzone.com/b12/messages/17421.shtml

SI says no fear because his buyout is so large but if he wants to leave (louisville) he pays the same so don't expect Cronin to go anywhere.
Why would Louisville want to hire Mick Cronin? I'd think they'd have higher standards. ucla I can understand, but not Louisville.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43424
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Post by Merkin »

UA should model their contracts after UCLA's, where the coach's buyout is the same as the university's. Fisch's buyout is $5.5M next season, and drop each season. UA's buyout is 70% of his salary.

https://www.azdesertswarm.com/football/ ... gents-2023
Post Reply